Jump to content

Ruin theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rewrite opening/lead
rewrite classical model section adding more citations
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[actuarial science]] and [[applied probability]] '''ruin theory''' (sometimes '''collective risk theory''') uses mathematical models to describe an insurer's vulnerability to insolvency/ruin. In such models key quantities of interest are the probability of ruin, distribution of surplus immediately prior to ruin and deficit at time of ruin.
In [[actuarial science]] and [[applied probability]] '''ruin theory''' (sometimes '''collective risk theory''') uses mathematical models to describe an insurer's vulnerability to insolvency/ruin. In such models key quantities of interest are the probability of ruin, distribution of surplus immediately prior to ruin and deficit at time of ruin.

==History==

The theoretical foundation of ruin theory, known as the classical compound-Poisson risk model in the literature, was introduced in 1903 by the Swedish actuary Filip Lundberg.<ref>Lundberg, F. (1903) Approximerad Framställning av Sannolikehetsfunktionen, Återförsäkering av Kollektivrisker, Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala.</ref> The classical model was later extended to relax assumptions about the inter-claim time distribution, the distribution of claim sizes, etc. In most cases, the principal objective of the classical model and its extensions was to calculate the probability of ultimate ruin.

Ruin theory received a substantial boost with the articles of [[Michael R. Powers]]<ref name="powers">{{cite doi|10.1016/0167-6687(95)00006-E}}</ref> in 1995 and Gerber and Shiu<ref name="gerber-shiu">{{cite doi|10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671}}</ref> in 1998, which introduced the '''expected discounted penalty function''', a generalization of the probability of ultimate ruin. This fundamental work was followed by a large number of papers in the ruin literature deriving related quantities in a variety of risk models.


==Classical model==
==Classical model==
Line 11: Line 5:
[[Image:Samplepathcompoundpoisson.JPG|thumb|right|350px|A sample path of compound Poisson risk process]]
[[Image:Samplepathcompoundpoisson.JPG|thumb|right|350px|A sample path of compound Poisson risk process]]


The theoretical foundation of ruin theory, known as the Cramer-Lundberg model (or classical compound-Poisson risk model, classical risk process<ref>{{cite doi|10.1016/0167-6687(87)90019-9}}</ref> or Poisson risk process) was introduced in 1903 by the Swedish actuary Filip Lundberg.<ref>Lundberg, F. (1903) Approximerad Framställning av Sannolikehetsfunktionen, Återförsäkering av Kollektivrisker, Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala.</ref> Lundberg's work was republished in the 1930s by [[Harald Cramér]].<ref>{{cite doi|10.1214/aos/1176350596}}</ref>
Traditionally, an insurer's surplus has been modeled as the result of two opposing cash flows: an incoming cash flow of premium income collected continuously at the rate of <math>c</math>, and an outgoing cash flow due to a sequence of insurance claims <math>Y_1,Y_2,\dots,Y_i,\dots,</math> that are mutually independent and identically distributed with common distribution function <math>P(y)</math>. The arrival of claims is assumed to follow a Poisson process with intensity rate <math>\lambda</math>, which means that the number of incurred claims <math>N(t)</math> at time <math>t</math> is governed by a [[Poisson distribution]] with mean <math>\lambda t</math>. Hence, the insurer's surplus at any time <math>t</math> is given by


The model describes an insurance company who experiences two opposing cash flows: incoming cash premiums and outgoing claims. Premiums arrive a constant rate ''c''&nbsp;>&nbsp;0 from customers and claims arrive according to a [[Poisson process]] and are [[independent and identically distributed non-negative random variables]] (they form a [[compound Poisson process]]). So for an insurer who starts with initial surplus ''x'',<ref>{{cite doi|10.1007/978-3-540-31343-4_1}}</ref>
:<math>X(t)=x+ct-\sum^{N(t)}_{i=0}Y_i,</math>
::<math>X_t = x + ct - \sum_{i=1}^{N_t} \xi_i \qquad \text{ for t } \geq 0.</math>
The central object of the model is to investigate the probability that the insurer's surplus level eventually falls below zero (making the firm bankrupt). This quantity, called the probability of ultimate ruin, is defined as
:<math>\psi(x)=\mathbb{P}^x\{\tau<\infty\}</math>
where the time of ruin is <math>\scriptstyle \tau=\inf\{X(t)<0\}</math> with the convention that <math>\scriptstyle \inf\varnothing=\infty</math>.


It is well known that the probability of ultimate ruin is the tail probability of a compound-geometric distribution. The exact solutions and asymptotic approximations to the probability of ruin rely largely on techniques of [[renewal theory]].
where the insurer's business commences with an initial surplus level <math>X(0)=x</math> under the probability measure <math>\mathbb{P}^x</math>. Note that the total claims made up to time ''t'' is a [[compound Poisson process]].


==Recent developments==
The central object of Lundberg's model was to investigate the probability that the insurer's surplus level eventually would fall below zero (making the firm bankrupt). This quantity, called the probability of ultimate ruin, is defined as


Ruin theory received a substantial boost with the articles of [[Michael R. Powers]]<ref name="powers">{{cite doi|10.1016/0167-6687(95)00006-E}}</ref> in 1995 and Gerber and Shiu<ref name="gerber-shiu">{{cite doi|10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671}}</ref> in 1998, which introduced the '''expected discounted penalty function''', a generalization of the probability of ultimate ruin. This fundamental work was followed by a large number of papers in the ruin literature deriving related quantities in a variety of risk models.
:<math>\psi(x)=\mathbb{P}^x\{\tau<\infty\}</math>

where the time of ruin is <math>\tau=\inf\{X(t)<0\}</math> with the convention that <math>\inf\varnothing=\infty</math>.

It is well known that the probability of ultimate ruin is the tail probability of a compound-geometric distribution. The exact solutions and asymptotic approximations to the probability of ruin rely largely on techniques of [[renewal theory]].


==Expected discounted penalty function==
==Expected discounted penalty function==

Revision as of 01:05, 15 February 2013

In actuarial science and applied probability ruin theory (sometimes collective risk theory) uses mathematical models to describe an insurer's vulnerability to insolvency/ruin. In such models key quantities of interest are the probability of ruin, distribution of surplus immediately prior to ruin and deficit at time of ruin.

Classical model

A sample path of compound Poisson risk process

The theoretical foundation of ruin theory, known as the Cramer-Lundberg model (or classical compound-Poisson risk model, classical risk process[1] or Poisson risk process) was introduced in 1903 by the Swedish actuary Filip Lundberg.[2] Lundberg's work was republished in the 1930s by Harald Cramér.[3]

The model describes an insurance company who experiences two opposing cash flows: incoming cash premiums and outgoing claims. Premiums arrive a constant rate c > 0 from customers and claims arrive according to a Poisson process and are independent and identically distributed non-negative random variables (they form a compound Poisson process). So for an insurer who starts with initial surplus x,[4]

The central object of the model is to investigate the probability that the insurer's surplus level eventually falls below zero (making the firm bankrupt). This quantity, called the probability of ultimate ruin, is defined as

where the time of ruin is with the convention that .

It is well known that the probability of ultimate ruin is the tail probability of a compound-geometric distribution. The exact solutions and asymptotic approximations to the probability of ruin rely largely on techniques of renewal theory.

Recent developments

Ruin theory received a substantial boost with the articles of Michael R. Powers[5] in 1995 and Gerber and Shiu[6] in 1998, which introduced the expected discounted penalty function, a generalization of the probability of ultimate ruin. This fundamental work was followed by a large number of papers in the ruin literature deriving related quantities in a variety of risk models.

Expected discounted penalty function

The articles of Powers[5] and Gerber and Shiu[6] analyzed the behavior of the insurer's surplus through the expected discounted penalty function, which is commonly referred to as Gerber-Shiu function in the ruin literature. It is arguable whether the function should have been called Powers-Gerber-Shiu function due to the contribution of Powers.[5]

In Powers’ notation, this is defined as

,

where is the discounting force of interest, is a general penalty function reflecting the economic costs to the insurer at the time of ruin, and the expectation corresponds to the probability measure . The function is called expected discounted cost of insolvency in Powers.[5]

In Gerber and Shiu’s notation, it is given as

,

where is the discounting force of interest and is a penalty function capturing the economic costs to the insurer at the time of ruin (assumed to depend on the surplus prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin ), and the expectation corresponds to the probability measure . Here the indicator function emphasizes that the penalty is exercised only when ruin occurs.

It is quite intuitive to interpret the expected discounted penalty function. Since the function measures the actuarial present value of the penalty that occurs at , the penalty function is multiplied by the discounting factor , and then averaged over the probability distribution of the waiting time to . While Gerber and Shiu[6] applied this function to the classical compound-Poisson model, Powers[5] argued that an insurer’s surplus is better modeled by a family of diffusion processes.

There are a great variety of ruin-related quantities that fall into the category of the expected discounted penalty function.

Special case Mathematical representation Choice of penalty function
Probability of ultimate ruin
Joint (defective) distribution of surplus and deficit
Defective distribution of claim causing ruin
Trivariate Laplace transform of time, surplus and deficit
Joint moments of surplus and deficit

Other finance-related quantities belonging to the class of the expected discounted penalty function include the perpetual American put option,[7] the contingent claim at optimal exercise time, and more.

Recent developments

  • Sparre-Andersen risk model
  • Compound-Poisson risk model with constant interest
  • Compound-Poisson risk model with stochastic interest
  • Brownian-motion risk model
  • General diffusion-process model
  • Markov-modulated risk model
  • Accident Probability Factor(APF) Calculator - Risk analysis model (@SBH)

See also

Bibliography

  • Gerber, H.U. (1979). An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Philadelphia: S.S. Heubner Foundation Monograph Series 8.
  • Asmussen S. (2000). Ruin Probabilities. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.

References

  1. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/0167-6687(87)90019-9, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/0167-6687(87)90019-9 instead.
  2. ^ Lundberg, F. (1903) Approximerad Framställning av Sannolikehetsfunktionen, Återförsäkering av Kollektivrisker, Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala.
  3. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1214/aos/1176350596, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1214/aos/1176350596 instead.
  4. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31343-4_1, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/978-3-540-31343-4_1 instead.
  5. ^ a b c d e Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/0167-6687(95)00006-E, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/0167-6687(95)00006-E instead.
  6. ^ a b c Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671 instead.
  7. ^ Gerber, H.U.; Shiu, E.S.W. (1997). "From ruin theory to option pricing" (PDF). AFIR Colloquium, Cairns, Australia 1997.