Maturity model: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''maturity model''' is a business tool used to assess people/culture, processes/structures, and objects/technology.<ref>Mettler |
A '''maturity model''' is a business tool used to assess people/culture, processes/structures, and objects/technology.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Mettler T |title=Maturity assessment models: a design scienceresearch approach |journal=International Journal of Society Systems Science |volume=3 |issue=1/2 |pages=213-222 |year=2011 |doi=10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934}}</ref> Two approaches for designing maturity models exist. With a top-down approach, such as proposed by Becker et al.<ref>Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J. (2009) [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12599-009-0044-5 Developing Maturity Models for IT Management - A Procedure Model and its Application]. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(3), 213-222</ref>, a fixed number of maturity stages or levels is specified first and further corroborated with characteristics (typically in form of specific assessment items) that support the initial assumptions about how maturity evolves. When using a bottom-up approach, such as suggested by Lahrmann et al.<ref>{{cite book |vauthors=Lahrmann G, Marx F, Mettler T, Winter R, Wortmann F |title=Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research |publisher=Springer |pages=176-191 |chapter=Inductive Design of Maturity Models: Applying the Rasch Algorithm for Design Science Research |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_13}}</ref>, distinct characteristics or assessment items are determined first and clustered in a second step into maturity levels to induce a more general view of the different steps of maturity evolution. Topics that are covered in maturity models include: |
||
== Universal == |
== Universal == |
||
Revision as of 09:20, 24 June 2016
A maturity model is a business tool used to assess people/culture, processes/structures, and objects/technology.[1] Two approaches for designing maturity models exist. With a top-down approach, such as proposed by Becker et al.[2], a fixed number of maturity stages or levels is specified first and further corroborated with characteristics (typically in form of specific assessment items) that support the initial assumptions about how maturity evolves. When using a bottom-up approach, such as suggested by Lahrmann et al.[3], distinct characteristics or assessment items are determined first and clustered in a second step into maturity levels to induce a more general view of the different steps of maturity evolution. Topics that are covered in maturity models include:
Universal
Project Management
- OPM3 (Organisational Project Management Maturity Model)
- P3M3 (Portfolio, Programme and Project Management Maturity Model)
Quality Management
Business Process Management
Strategics
Change Management
Information Technology
- Capability Maturity Model (CMM, focusing on software development)
- Open Source Maturity Model (for open-source software development)
- Service Integration Maturity Model (for SOA)
- Modeling Maturity Levels (for software specification)
- Enterprise IT Performance Maturity Model
- Software Product Management Maturity Model
- The SharePoint Maturity Model
- Application Performance Management Maturity Model
- Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Maturity Model
- DevOps maturity model
- ITIL Maturity Model
- Richardson Maturity Model (for HTTP-based web services)
Learning
- E-learning Maturity Model (EMM)
- Mobile Learning Maturity Model
- Learning & Performance Maturity Model
Human Resources
- People Capability Maturity Model (PCMM) (for the management of human assets)
- Virtual Team Maturity Model (VTMM)
Testing
- Testing Maturity Model (TMM) (assessing test processes in an organization)
- Test Maturity Model integration (TMMi)
Analytics
Enterprise Architecture
- enterprise Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM)
- Dynamic Architecture Maturity Matrix (DyAMM)
Energy Infrastructure
Sustainability
Supply Chain
Social Media
Marketing
Continuous Delivery
Support
PLM
Security Assurance
- Building Security In Maturity Model (BSIMM)
- CYBERSECURITY CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL (C2M2)
- Systems Security Engineering Capability Maturity Model (SSE-CMM)
- Software Assurance Maturity Model (openSAMM)
This article includes a list of related items that share the same name (or similar names).
If an internal link incorrectly led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.
If an internal link incorrectly led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.
- ^ Mettler T (2011). "Maturity assessment models: a design scienceresearch approach". International Journal of Society Systems Science. 3 (1/2): 213–222. doi:10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934.
- ^ Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J. (2009) Developing Maturity Models for IT Management - A Procedure Model and its Application. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(3), 213-222
- ^ Lahrmann G, Marx F, Mettler T, Winter R, Wortmann F. "Inductive Design of Maturity Models: Applying the Rasch Algorithm for Design Science Research". Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. Springer. pp. 176–191. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_13.