Dipole repeller: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Context}} {{Linkrot}} |
Meatsgains (talk | contribs) Filled in 1 bare reference(s) with reFill () |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{linkrot|date=January 2017}} |
|||
{{context|date=January 2017}} |
{{context|date=January 2017}} |
||
The '''dipole repeller''' is a repeller opposed to the [[Shapley attractor]]<ref>http://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-016-0036</ref>. |
The '''dipole repeller''' is a repeller opposed to the [[Shapley attractor]]<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-016-0036|title=The dipole repeller|first1=Yehuda|last1=Hoffman|first2=Daniel|last2=Pomarède|first3=R. Brent|last3=Tully|first4=Hélène M.|last4=Courtois|date=30 January 2017|publisher=|volume=1|issue=2|doi=10.1038/s41550-016-0036}}</ref>. |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 23:14, 30 January 2017
 | This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. (January 2017) |
The dipole repeller is a repeller opposed to the Shapley attractor[1].
References
- ^ Hoffman, Yehuda; Pomarède, Daniel; Tully, R. Brent; Courtois, Hélène M. (30 January 2017). "The dipole repeller". 1 (2). doi:10.1038/s41550-016-0036.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
 | This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (January 2017) |