World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m http->https
second notice
Line 6: Line 6:


In contrast, the UCS-led [[petition]] contains specific recommendations: "We must, for example, move away from [[fossil fuels]] to more benign, inexhaustible [[energy]] sources to cut [[greenhouse gas]] [[Greenhouse gas#Greenhouse gas emissions|emissions]] and the [[pollution]] of our [[air pollution|air]] and [[water pollution|water]]. ... We must stabilize population."
In contrast, the UCS-led [[petition]] contains specific recommendations: "We must, for example, move away from [[fossil fuels]] to more benign, inexhaustible [[energy]] sources to cut [[greenhouse gas]] [[Greenhouse gas#Greenhouse gas emissions|emissions]] and the [[pollution]] of our [[air pollution|air]] and [[water pollution|water]]. ... We must stabilize population."

==Second notice==
After 25 years, humanity has not taken the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperilled biosphere. In November of 2017, 15,364 scientists signed World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: Second Notice calling for, among other things, limiting population growth, and drastically diminishing our per capita ­consumption of fossil fuels, meat, and other resources.<ref>{{cite journal|vauthors=Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Galetti M, Alamgir M, Crist E, Mahmoud MI, Laurance WF|title=World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice|journal=[[BioScience]]|date=13 November 2017|volume=|doi=10.1093/biosci/bix125|url=https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/doi/10.1093/biosci/bix125/4605229}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 19:36, 17 November 2017

In late 1992, the late Henry W. Kendall, a former chair of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) board of directors, wrote "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity", which begins: "Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course." A majority of the Nobel Prize laureates in the sciences signed the document;[1] about 1,700 of the world's leading scientists appended their signature.

It is sometimes offered in opposition to the Heidelberg Appeal—also signed by numerous scientists and Nobel laureates earlier in 1992—which begins by criticizing "an irrational ideology which is opposed to scientific and industrial progress, and impedes economic and social development." This document is often cited by those who oppose theories relating to climate change.

However, the Heidelberg Appeal offers no specific recommendations and is not an indictment of environmental science: "We fully subscribe to the objectives of a scientific ecology for a universe whose resources must be taken stock of, monitored and preserved. But we herewith demand that this stock-taking, monitoring and preservation be founded on scientific criteria and not on irrational pre-conceptions."

In contrast, the UCS-led petition contains specific recommendations: "We must, for example, move away from fossil fuels to more benign, inexhaustible energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emissions and the pollution of our air and water. ... We must stabilize population."

Second notice

After 25 years, humanity has not taken the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperilled biosphere. In November of 2017, 15,364 scientists signed World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: Second Notice calling for, among other things, limiting population growth, and drastically diminishing our per capita ­consumption of fossil fuels, meat, and other resources.[2]

References

  1. ^ "Textfile containing the Warning and a list of selected signatories". stanford.edu. Retrieved 2011-08-26. (Archived by WebCite® at https://www.webcitation.org/61DcmWeQM)
  2. ^ Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Galetti M, Alamgir M, Crist E, Mahmoud MI, Laurance WF (13 November 2017). "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice". BioScience. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125.

External links