Fomite: Difference between revisions
Covidediting (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
SARS-CoV-2 was found to be viable on various surfaces from 4 to 72 hours under laboratory conditions.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=van Doremalen|first=Neeltje|last2=Bushmaker|first2=Trenton|last3=Morris|first3=Dylan H.|last4=Holbrook|first4=Myndi G.|last5=Gamble|first5=Amandine|last6=Williamson|first6=Brandi N.|last7=Tamin|first7=Azaibi|last8=Harcourt|first8=Jennifer L.|last9=Thornburg|first9=Natalie J.|last10=Gerber|first10=Susan I.|last11=Lloyd-Smith|first11=James O.|date=2020-04-16|title=Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1|url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2004973|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|language=en|volume=382|issue=16|pages=1564–1567|doi=10.1056/NEJMc2004973|issn=0028-4793|pmc=PMC7121658|pmid=32182409}}</ref> However, fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in real healthcare settings is yet to be determined.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Zhang|first=D.X.|date=2020-07|title=SARS-CoV-2: air/aerosols and surfaces in laboratory and clinical settings|url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195670120302322|journal=Journal of Hospital Infection|language=en|volume=105|issue=3|pages=577–579|doi=10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.001|pmc=PMC7204655|pmid=32387746}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | The 2007 research showed that influenza virus was still active on stainless steel 24 hours after contamination. Though on hands it survives only for five minutes, the constant contact with a fomite almost certainly means catching the infection.<ref>{{harvnb|Larson|Liverman|2011|page=41}}</ref> Transfer efficiency depends not only on surface, but mainly on pathogen type. For example, [[avian influenza]] survives on both porous and non-porous materials for 144 hours.<ref>{{harvnb|Cook|2013|p=208}}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | The 2007 research showed that influenza virus was still active on stainless steel 24 hours after contamination. Though on hands it survives only for five minutes, the constant contact with a fomite almost certainly means catching the infection.<ref>{{harvnb|Larson|Liverman|2011|page=41}}</ref> Transfer efficiency depends not only on surface, but mainly on pathogen type. For example, [[avian influenza]] survives on both porous and non-porous materials for 144 hours.<ref>{{harvnb|Cook|2013|p=208}}</ref> |
||
Contaminated needles are the most common fomite that transmits HIV.<ref>{{harvnb|Shors|2017|p=279}}</ref> |
Contaminated needles are the most common fomite that transmits HIV.<ref>{{harvnb|Shors|2017|p=279}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 08:49, 24 August 2020
A fomite (/ˈfoʊmaɪt/) or fomes (/ˈfoʊmiːz/) is any inanimate object that, when contaminated with or exposed to infectious agents (such as pathogenic bacteria, viruses or fungi), can transfer disease to a new host.[1] In the 21st century, the role of fomites in disease transfer is higher than ever in human history because of the indoor lifestyle.[2]
Transfer of pathogens by fomites
A fomite is any inanimate object (also called passive vector) that, when contaminated with or exposed to infectious agents (such as pathogenic bacteria, viruses or fungi), can transfer disease to a new host.[1] Many common objects can sustain a pathogen until a person comes in contact with the pathogen, increasing the chance of infection. The likely objects are different in a hospital environment than at home or in a workplace.
Hospital fomites
For humans, skin cells, hair, clothing, and bedding are common hospital fomites.[3]
Fomites are associated particularly with hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), as they are possible routes to pass pathogens between patients. Stethoscopes and neckties are common fomites associated with health care providers. It worries epidemiologists and hospital practitioners because of the growing selection of microbes resistant to disinfectants or antibiotics (so-called antimicrobial resistance phenomenon).
Basic hospital equipment, such as IV drip tubes, catheters, and life support equipment, can also be carriers, when the pathogens form biofilms on the surfaces. Careful sterilization of such objects prevents cross-infection.[4] Used syringes, if improperly handled, are particularly dangerous fomites.
In addition to objects in hospital settings, other common fomites for humans are cups, spoons, pencils, bath faucet handles, toilet flush levers, door knobs, light switches, handrails, elevator buttons, television remote controls, pens, touch screens, common-use phones, keyboards, and computer mice, coffeepot handles, countertops, and any other items that may be frequently touched by different people and infrequently cleaned.
Everyday life
When two children in one household have influenza, more than 50% of shared items are contaminated with virus. In 40–90% cases, an adult infected with rhinovirus has virus on their hands.[5]
In 1916 in the French town of Lille authorities were warned by health official Dr Niessen [6] that transmission of typhoid could occur during religious ceremonies via spread of contaminated holy water, or via the kiss on the bishop's ring or monstrance, especially as the priests were in frequent contact with the sick and dying.
Transmission of specific viruses
Researchers have discovered that smooth (non-porous) surfaces like door knobs transmit bacteria and viruses better than porous materials like paper money because porous, especially fibrous, materials absorb and trap the contagion, making it harder to contract through simple touch.[7] Nonetheless, fomites may include soiled clothes, towels, linens, handkerchiefs, and surgical dressings.[8][9]
SARS-CoV-2 was found to be viable on various surfaces from 4 to 72 hours under laboratory conditions.[10] However, fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in real healthcare settings is yet to be determined.[11]
The 2007 research showed that influenza virus was still active on stainless steel 24 hours after contamination. Though on hands it survives only for five minutes, the constant contact with a fomite almost certainly means catching the infection.[12] Transfer efficiency depends not only on surface, but mainly on pathogen type. For example, avian influenza survives on both porous and non-porous materials for 144 hours.[13]
Contaminated needles are the most common fomite that transmits HIV.[14]
Etymology
The Italian scholar and physician Girolamo Fracastoro appears to have first used the Latin word fomes, meaning "tinder", in this sense in his essay on contagion, De Contagione et Contagiosis Morbis, published in 1546:[15] "By fomes I mean clothes, wooden objects, and things of that sort, which though not themselves corrupted can, nevertheless, preserve the original germs of the contagion and infect by means of these".[16]
English usage of fomes, pronounced /ˈfoʊmiːz/, is documented since 1658.[17] The English word fomite, which has been in use since 1859, is a back-formation from the plural fomites (originally borrowed from the Latin plural fōmĭtēs [ˈfoːmɪteːs] of fōmĕs [ˈfoːmɛs]).[18][19] Over time, the English-language pronunciation of the plural fomites changed from /ˈfoʊmɪtiːz/) to /ˈfoʊmaɪts/, which led to the creation of a new singular fomite, pronounced /ˈfoʊmaɪt/.[19][20][21] The French fomite, Italian fomite, Spanish fómite and Portuguese fómite or fômite, however, are derived directly from the Latin accusative singular fōmĭtēm, as it usually happens with Latin common nouns.
Popular culture
Fomites play a conspicuous role in Steven Soderbergh's 2011 film Contagion about a pandemic.[22]
See also
References
- ^ a b Cramer, Lorraine (1 September 2011). "Fomites, fomites, fomites!". Microblogology. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 208
- ^ Bennett, Jarvis & Brachman 2007, p. 275
- ^ Larson & Liverman 2011, pp. 41–42
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 207
- ^ "Bulletin de Lille". www.gutenberg.org. January 1916.
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 208
- ^ Abad, F. X.; R. M. Pintó; A. Bosch (October 1994). "Survival of enteric viruses on environmental fomites". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 60 (10): 3704–10. PMC 201876. PMID 7986043.
- ^ Pope, Theodore W.; Peter T. Ender; William K. Woelk; Michael A. Koroscil; Thomas M. Koroscil (December 2002). "Bacterial contamination of paper currency". Southern Medical Journal. 95 (12): 1408–10. doi:10.1097/00007611-200295120-00011. PMID 12597308.
- ^ van Doremalen, Neeltje; Bushmaker, Trenton; Morris, Dylan H.; Holbrook, Myndi G.; Gamble, Amandine; Williamson, Brandi N.; Tamin, Azaibi; Harcourt, Jennifer L.; Thornburg, Natalie J.; Gerber, Susan I.; Lloyd-Smith, James O. (16 April 2020). "Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1". New England Journal of Medicine. 382 (16): 1564–1567. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2004973. ISSN 0028-4793. PMC 7121658. PMID 32182409.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Zhang, D.X. (2020-07). "SARS-CoV-2: air/aerosols and surfaces in laboratory and clinical settings". Journal of Hospital Infection. 105 (3): 577–579. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.001. PMC 7204655. PMID 32387746.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Larson & Liverman 2011, p. 41
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 208
- ^ Shors 2017, p. 279
- ^ Nutton, Vivian (1990). "The Reception of Fracastoro's Theory of Contagion: The Seed That Fell among Thorns?". Osiris. 2nd Series, Vol. 6, Renaissance Medical Learning: Evolution of a Tradition. University of Chicago Press: 196–234. doi:10.1086/368701. JSTOR 301787. PMID 11612689.
- ^ Fracastoro, Girolamo (1961). "Contagion, contagious diseases and their treatment (1546)". In Brock, Thomas D. (ed.). Milestones in Microbiology. Translated by Wright, Wilmer C. Prentice-Hall International. pp. 69–75. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
- ^ "fomes". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ Fortuine 2000, p. 53
- ^ a b "fomite". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
- ^ "fomite". Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.
- ^ "Language Log: Fomite: panacea or backformation?". itre.cis.upenn.edu.
- ^ Horn, John (8 September 2011). "Word of Mouth: 'Contagion' could really catch on". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 12 August 2013.
Bibliography
- Cook, Nigel (2013), "10.1 Introduction; the role of fomites in the virus transmission", Viruses in Food and Water: Risks, Surveillance and Control, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 205–215, ISBN 978-0-85709-887-0
{{citation}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Bennett, John V.; Jarvis, William Robert; Brachman, Philip S. (2007), "Chapter 19: The Inanimate Environment", Bennett & Brachman's Hospital Infections, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, p. 277, ISBN 978-0-7817-6383-7
{{citation}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Fortuine, Robert (2000), The Words of Medicine: Sources, Meanings, and Delights, Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher, p. 53, ISBN 0398071322
{{citation}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Larson, Elaine L.; Liverman, Catharyn T. (2011), "Understanding the Risk to Healthcare Personnel: Fomite Persistence", Preventing Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Diseases: Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel: Update 2010, Washington: National Academies Press, p. 41, ISBN 978-0-309-16254-8
{{citation}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help) - Shors, Teri (2017), "Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Human Herpersviruses", Understanding Viruses, Wisconsin: Jones & Bartlett Learning, ISBN 978-1-284-02592-7
{{citation}}: Invalid|ref=harv(help)
External links