Jump to content

Rugate filter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Translation in progress
Line 8: Line 8:


:<math>n_Ld_L + n_Hd_H = \frac{\lambda_0}{2}</math>
:<math>n_Ld_L + n_Hd_H = \frac{\lambda_0}{2}</math>
In this equation <math>n_L</math> and <math>n_H</math> stand for the high and low refractive indices of the Bragg mirror while <math>d_L</math> and <math>d_H</math> characterize the respective thicknesses of these layers. For the more general case that the refractive index changes continuously, the previous equation can be rewritten as:

:<math>\frac{\int_0^d{n(x)}dx}{d}d = \left \langle n \right \rangle d = \frac{\lambda_0}{2} </math>

On the left hand side is the integral over the refractive index over one period of the refractive index profile <math>n(x)</math> divided by the period length <math>d</math>. This term corresponds to the mean value of the refractive index profile.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Stenzel, O. (Olaf),|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/879593612|title=Optical coatings : material aspects in theory and practice|isbn=978-3-642-54063-9|location=Heidelberg|oclc=879593612}}</ref> As a [[sanity check]] for the correctness of this equation, one can solve the integral for a discrete refractive index profile and substitute the period of a Bragg mirror <math>d = d_H + d_L</math>.

The figure on the right shows the reflection spectra calculated by the [[Transfer-matrix method (optics)|transfer-matrix method]] for the refractive index profiles of a Bragg and Rugate mirror. It can be seen that both mirrors have their maximum reflectivity at 700 nm, whereas the rugate mirror has a lower bandwidth. For this reason rugate mirrors are often used as optical [[Band-stop filter|notch filters]]. Furthermore one can see a smaller peak in the spectrum of the rugate filter at <math>\lambda_0/2</math>. This peak is not present in the spectrum of the Bragg mirror because of its discrete layer system, which causes destructive interference at this wavelength. However, Bragg mirrors have secondary maxima at wavelengths of <math>\lambda_0/(2n-1)</math>, which may be undesirable if you only want to filter out a certain wavelength. Rugate mirrors are better suited for this purpose because the sinusoidal refractive index profile has [[Anti-reflective coating|anti-reflection]] properties similar to those of [[black silicon]]. This reduces the intensity of the secondary maxima.<ref name=":0" />


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 19:57, 18 November 2020

A Rugate filter, also known as a gradient-index filter, is an optical filter based on a dielectric mirror that selectively reflects specific wavelength ranges of light. This effect is achieved by a periodic, continuous change of the refractive index of the dielectric coating.[1]. The word "rugate" is derived from corrugated structures found in nature, which also selectively reflect certain wavelength ranges of light.[2] An example is the wings of the Morpho butterfly.[3]

Characteristics

Refractive index profile of a Bragg and a rugate mirror with maximum Reflectivity at 700 nm.
Reflection spectra of perpendicularly incident light on a Bragg and a rugate mirror with maximum Reflectivity at 700 nm.

In rugate mirrors the refractive index varies periodically and continuously as a function of the depth of the mirror coating. This is similar to Bragg mirrors with the difference that the refractive index profile of a Bragg mirror is discontinuous. The refractive index profiles of a Rugate and a Bragg mirror are shown in the graph on the right. In Bragg mirrors, the discontinuous transitions are responsible for reflection of incident light, whereas in rugate mirrors, incident light is reflected throughout the thickness of the coating. According to the Fresnel equations, however, the reflection coefficient is greatest where the greatest change in refractive index occurs. For rugate mirrors, these are the inflection points in the refractive index profile. The theory of the Bragg mirror leads to a calculation of the wavelength at which the reflection of a rugate mirror is greatest. For an alternating sequence in the Bragg mirror, the maximum reflection at a wavelength :

In this equation and stand for the high and low refractive indices of the Bragg mirror while and characterize the respective thicknesses of these layers. For the more general case that the refractive index changes continuously, the previous equation can be rewritten as:

On the left hand side is the integral over the refractive index over one period of the refractive index profile divided by the period length . This term corresponds to the mean value of the refractive index profile.[4] As a sanity check for the correctness of this equation, one can solve the integral for a discrete refractive index profile and substitute the period of a Bragg mirror .

The figure on the right shows the reflection spectra calculated by the transfer-matrix method for the refractive index profiles of a Bragg and Rugate mirror. It can be seen that both mirrors have their maximum reflectivity at 700 nm, whereas the rugate mirror has a lower bandwidth. For this reason rugate mirrors are often used as optical notch filters. Furthermore one can see a smaller peak in the spectrum of the rugate filter at . This peak is not present in the spectrum of the Bragg mirror because of its discrete layer system, which causes destructive interference at this wavelength. However, Bragg mirrors have secondary maxima at wavelengths of , which may be undesirable if you only want to filter out a certain wavelength. Rugate mirrors are better suited for this purpose because the sinusoidal refractive index profile has anti-reflection properties similar to those of black silicon. This reduces the intensity of the secondary maxima.[4]

References

  1. ^ Paschotta, Dr Rüdiger. "Rugate Filters". www.rp-photonics.com. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  2. ^ Macleod, H. A. (2001). Thin-film optical filters (3rd ed.). Bristol: Institute of Physics Pub. ISBN 0-7503-0688-2.
  3. ^ Potyrailo, Radislav A.; Bonam, Ravi K.; Hartley, John G.; et al. (November 2015). "Towards outperforming conventional sensor arrays with fabricated individual photonic vapour sensors inspired by Morpho butterflies". Nature Communications. 6 (1): 7959. doi:10.1038/ncomms8959.
  4. ^ a b Stenzel, O. (Olaf),. Optical coatings : material aspects in theory and practice. Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-54063-9. OCLC 879593612.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)