Jump to content

Ackermann set theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Caleb Stanford (talk | contribs) at 19:20, 20 September 2022 (self-revert). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics and logic, Ackermann set theory (AST) is an axiomatic set theory proposed by Wilhelm Ackermann in 1956.[1]

The language

AST is formulated in first-order logic. The language of AST contains one binary relation denoting set membership and one constant denoting the class of all sets (Ackermann used a predicate instead).

The axioms

The axioms of AST are the following:[2][3][4]

  1. extensionality
  2. heredity:
  3. comprehension on : for any formula where is not free,
  4. Ackermann's schema: for any formula with free variables and no occurrences of ,

An alternative axiomatization uses the following axioms:[5]

  1. extensionality
  2. heredity
  3. comprehension
  4. reflection: for any formula with free variables ,
  5. regularity

denotes the relativization of to , which replaces all quantifiers in of the form and by and , respectively.

Relation to Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory

Let be the language of formulas that do not mention .

In 1959, Azriel Levy proved that if is a formula of and AST proves , then ZF proves .[6]

In 1970, William N. Reinhardt proved that if is a formula of and ZF proves , then AST proves .[7]

Therefore, AST and ZF are mutually interpretable in conservative extensions of each other. Thus they are equiconsistent.

A remarkable feature of AST is that, unlike NBG and its variants, a proper class can be an element of another proper class.[4]

An extension of AST called ARC was developed by F.A. Muller, who stated that ARC "founds Cantorian set-theory as well as category-theory and therefore can pass as a founding theory of the whole of mathematics".[8]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ackermann, Wilhelm (August 1956). "Zur Axiomatik der Mengenlehre". Mathematische Annalen. 131: 336–345. doi:10.1007/BF01350103. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  2. ^ Kanamori, Akihiro (July 2006). "Levy and set theory". Annals of Pure and Applied Logic. 140 (1): 233–252. doi:10.1016/j.apal.2005.09.009. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  3. ^ Holmes, M. Randall (Sep 21, 2021). "Alternative Axiomatic Set Theories". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  4. ^ a b Fraenkel, Abraham A.; Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua; Levy, Azriel (December 1, 1973). "7.7. The System of Ackermann". Foundations of Set Theory. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. 67. pp. 148–153. ISBN 9780080887050.
  5. ^ Schindler, Ralf (23 May 2014). "Chapter 2: Axiomatic Set Theory". Set Theory: Exploring Independence and Truth. Springer, Cham. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-3-319-06724-7.
  6. ^ Lévy, Azriel (June 1959). "On Ackermann's Set Theory". The Journal of Symbolic Logic. 24 (2): 154–166. doi:10.2307/2964757. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  7. ^ Reinhardt, William N. (October 1970). "Ackermann's set theory equals ZF". Annals of Mathematical Logic. 2 (2): 189–249. doi:10.1016/0003-4843(70)90011-2. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  8. ^ Muller, F. A. (Sep 2001). "Sets, Classes, and Categories". The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 52 (3): 539–573. Retrieved 9 September 2022.