Jump to content

Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by D Eaketts (talk | contribs) at 12:30, 26 June 2022 (Reception: Minor edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022
Long titleAn Act to make provision for an Animal Sentience Committee with functions relating to the effect of government policy on the welfare of animals as sentient beings.
Citation2022 c.22
Introduced byGeorge Eustice (Commons)
Lord Benyon (Lords)
Territorial extent United Kingdom
Dates
Royal assent28 April 2022
Status: Current legislation
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022 (c. 22) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was introduced to parliament by the Government of the United Kingdom at the 2021 State Opening of Parliament.[1] The act recognises animal sentience in law for the first time.[2][3]

Background

The bill was created after an original attempt to reintroduce animal sentience back into the law through the Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Bill 2017.[4] Before Brexit sentience was provided through Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which stated that States "shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals" when they formulate EU policies.[5] On the 15th November 2017, a vote was taken on whether to incorporate Article 13 into the EU (Withdrawal) Bill where it was defeated 313 to 295 votes in the House of Commons,[6]  as well as 211 against to 169 for in the House of Lords.[7]  The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill partly came about through the desire to separate out the two sections of the Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Bill, being sentencing and sentience.[8]

Passage

The bill was introduced by minister Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park on 13 May 2021.[9]

Reception

The Act has drawn a lot of attention in the media for several reasons. Fears that the bill will infringe on "kosher and halal slaughter, game shooting, killing vermin on farms and testing medical products on animals" were raised in a letter written by several Tory donors.[10] Further complaints were raised such as the notion that the UK has recognised animal sentience and that animal welfare has been around in the UK for 200 years (originally introduced in the Cruel Treatment of Cattle Act 1822).[11] This sentiment was expressed by Nick Herbert in the House of Lords as well as Daniel Hannan, arguing that the law is already clear on the issue. The idea that the law in place is already enough may not be accurate after Brexit, Nurse argues that leaving the EU will result in a step back in terms of animal rights, returning animals to the status of things.[12] The reason for this is that there are significant differences between the laws MPs state as reasons for not including sentience in the law and the protections that used to be granted by EU law, in particular Article 13.[13] McCulloch draws attention to the fact that the Animal Welfare Act fails to protect wild animals whereas Article 13 protects all sentient animals.[13] Therefore, the firm placement of animal sentience in the law could be a step in the right direction for animal welfare according to Horton and Merritt.[14]

There have also been critique that the bill did not go far enough as it fails to recognise the sentience of invertebrates. According to recent studies conducted by Sherwin, it is argued that this notion that invertebrates are not sentient is incorrect, as many studies on them are conducted differently.[15] If the same arguments from analogy were used in investigations on invertebrates then it would be concluded that they were sentient.[16] Therefore, leaving them out of the bill may cause them to be unduly unprotected.[17] It has been pointed out that the bill excludes the vast majority of animals from any ethical consideration.[18]

Including at least some invertebrates under the protection of the bill may also be supported by public opinion. For example, research nonprofit Rethink Priorities conducted a UK national survey for their submitted evidence to the bill. On the question of whether invertebrates are capable of feeling pain, the think tank reported that most of the "participants agreed that lobsters (83.03%), octopuses (80.65%), and crabs (78.09%) can feel pain". Also, 91.06% "of participants agreed that if scientific experts believe there is some evidence that an animal could be capable of feeling pain, we should be careful about potentially harming them".[19]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Animals to be formally recognised as sentient beings in domestic law". GOV.UK. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  2. ^ "Animals to be formally recognised as sentient beings in UK law". The Guardian. 12 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  3. ^ Hope, Christopher; Hymas, Charles (8 May 2021). "Exclusive: Animals to have their feelings protected by law in Queen's Speech". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  4. ^ "Draft Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Bill 2017". GOV.UK. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  5. ^ "EUR-Lex - 12016E013 - EN - EUR-Lex". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  6. ^ "Brexit, Article 13, and the debate on recognising "animal sentience" in law" (PDF). A-Law UK Centre for Animal Law. 28 November 2017. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  7. ^ "Lords vote against animal sentience - ProQuest". www.proquest.com. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  8. ^ "Animal Welfare (Sentencing and Recognition of Sentience) Bill report published - Committees - UK Parliament". committees.parliament.uk. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  9. ^ "Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL] - Parliamentary Bills - UK Parliament". bills.parliament.uk. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
  10. ^ Reporter, Eleni Courea, Political. "Tory rebels fear activists will hijack animal sentience bill". ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 3 August 2021.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ "Sentience bill will glue up government with a bonkers animal rights agenda - Nick Herbert". www.yorkshirepost.co.uk. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  12. ^ Nurse, Angus (2019). "A Question of Sentience: Brexit, Animal Welfare and Animal Protection Law". Journal of Animal & Environmental Law. 10: 32–59.
  13. ^ a b McCulloch, Steven (2019). "Brexit and Animal Welfare Impact Assessment: Analysis of the Threats Brexit Poses to Animal Protection in the UK, EU and Internationally". Animals. 9: 117.
  14. ^ Jessica Horton and Jonathan Merritt, 'Show Me Your Horse and I Will Tell You Who You Are: Brexit, a Chance to Acknowledge Animal Sentience in Law' (2019) 31 Denning LJ 5
  15. ^ M, Sherwin (2001). "Can Invertebrates Suffer? Or, How Robust is Argument-by-Analogy?". Animal Welfare. 10: 103–118.
  16. ^ Sherwin, C M (1 February 2001). "Can Invertebrates Suffer? Or, How Robust is Argument-by-Analogy?". Animal Welfare. 10 (1): 103–118.
  17. ^ Pandey, Manish (18 June 2021). "MPs: Octopuses feel pain and need legal protection". BBC News. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  18. ^ Jakopovich, Daniel (2021). "The UK's Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill Excludes the Vast Majority of Animals: Why We Must Expand Our Moral Circle to Include Invertebrates". Animals & Society Research Initiative, University of Victoria, Canada.
  19. ^ Rethink Priorities (2021). "Rethink Priorities: Submission of Evidence to Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill". Retrieved 2021-08-17.