Barbier v. Connolly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 19:54, 6 June 2016 (Substing templates: {{scite}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Barbier v. Connolly
Submitted November 25, 1884
Decided January 5, 1885
Full case nameBarbier v. Connolly
Citations113 U.S. 27 (more)
5 S. Ct. 357; 28 L. Ed. 923; 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1647
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field
Joseph P. Bradley · John M. Harlan
William B. Woods · Stanley Matthews
Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford
Case opinion
MajorityField, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27 (1885), was a United States Supreme Court in which the Court considered the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to a San Francisco ordinance regulating the establishment of public laundries. The Court held that the regulation of laundries for public health and public safety reasons were clearly within the police powers of the state, and the Fourteenth Amendment was not meant to interfere with the police powers of the state.

External links

  • Text of Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27 (1885) is available from: Findlaw  Justia