Flow (policy debate)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Part of the series
Policy Debate
Organization
Policy debate competitions

Inter-Collegiate policy debate

Format
Structure of policy debate · Resolution

Constructive · Rebuttal · Prep Time
Evidence · Flow

Participants

Affirmative · Negative · Judge

Types of Arguments

Stock Issues · Case· Disadvantage
Counterplan · Kritik
Impact calculus · Topicality

Argumentative Concepts

Offense · Defense · Turn · Drop · Fiat

In policy debate, the flow is the name given to a specialized form of notetaking, which debaters use to keep track of all of the arguments in the round.

It incorporates specialized abbreviations and notations to allow debaters to keep up with the rapid speed of delivery in most speeches. Some examples of these abbreviations are DA for disadvantage and K for kritik (critique).

Flowing can be done on paper or on a laptop using a spreadsheet program such as Microsoft Excel. In collegiate debate, computers may be used in any round, however in high school this is sometimes not allowed. Those tournaments that follow the National Forensic League regulations may or may not allow laptops depending on the district, but many so-called national circuit tournaments and some states allow the use of laptops in round. Debaters often prefer to use legal paper to be able to capture the numerous arguments read on each position. Numerous sheets of paper (or tabs in a spreadsheet) are used each round as debaters normally use one sheet for each different type of argument read.

[edit] Backflowing

After the 1NC and 2AC, the second negative speaker and the first affirmative speaker will "backflow" their partner who has just given a speech. This can often be accomplished during the cross-examination or the prep time preceding the next speech. The 1NC requires backflowing because they need to flow what issues they are going to argue ('take') in the 1NR and the 2AC needs backflowing because they need a flow of these arguments so that they can carry the argument to the end of the round ('extend') during the 2AR.

The 1AC is not backflowed because most affirmative debaters are presumably already familiar with the arguments or they have flowed the arguments before or during the speech. The negative block is not backflowed because the 1NR is prepping during the 2NC and the 1NR has no further speeches. The rest of the rebuttals are not backflowed for the same reason.

[edit] References

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export