Intelligibility (communication)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Helpful Pixie Bot (talk | contribs) at 19:17, 6 May 2012 (ISBNs (Build KC)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In phonetics, Intelligibility is a measure of how comprehendible speech is, or the degree to which speech can be understood. Intelligibility is affected by spoken clarity, explicitness, lucidity, comprehensibility, perspicuity, and precision.

Noise levels

For satisfactory communication, the average speech level should exceed that of an interfering noise by 6dB; lower sound:noise ratios are rarely acceptable (Moore, 1997). Manifesting in a wide frequency range, speech is quite resistant to many types of masking frequency cut-off—Moore reports, for example, that a band of frequencies from 1000 Hz to 2000 Hz is sufficient (sentence articulation score of about 90%).

Quantity to be measured Unit of measurement Good values
STI[1] Intelligibility (international known) > 0.6
CIS Intelligibility (international known) > 0.78
%Alcons Articulation loss (popular in USA) < 10 %
C50 Clarity index (widespread in Germany) > 3 dB
RASTI (obsolete) Intelligibility (international known) > 0.6

Word articulation remains high even when only 1–2% of the wave is unaffected by distortion:[2]

Intelligibility with different types of speech

Lombard speech

The human brain automatically changes speech made in noise through a process called the Lombard effect. Such speech has increased intelligibility compared to normal speech. It is not only louder but the frequencies of its phonetic fundamental are increased and the durations of its vowels are prolonged. People also tend to make more noticeable facial movements.[3][4]

Screaming

Shouted speech is less intelligible than Lombard speech because increased vocal energy produces decreased phonetic information.[5]

Clear speech

Clear speech is used when talking to a person with a hearing impairment. It is characterized by a slower speaking rate, more and longer pauses, elevated speech intensity, increased word duration, "targeted" vowel formants, increased consonant intensity compared to adjacent vowels, and a number of phonological changes (including fewer reduced vowels and more released stop bursts).[6][7]

Infant-directed speech

Infant-directed speech—or Baby talk—uses a simplified syntax and a small and easier-to-understand vocabulary than speech directed to adults[8] Compared to adult directed speech, it has a higher fundamental frequency, exaggerated pitch range, and slower rate.[9]

Citation speech

Citation speech occurs when people engage self-consciously in spoken language research. It has a slower tempo and fewer connected speech processes (e.g., shortening of nuclear vowels, devoicing of word-final consonants) than normal speech.[10]

Hyperspace speech

Hyperspace speech, also known as the hyperspace effect, occurs when people are misled about the presence of environment noise. It involves modifying the F1 and F2 of phonetic vowel targets to ease perceived difficulties on the part of the listener in recovering information from the acoustic signal.[10]

Notes

  1. ^ Speech Intelligibility Measurement Methods
  2. ^ Moore, C.J. (1997). An introduction to the psychology of hearing. Academic Press. 4th ed. Academic Press. London. ISBN 978-0-12-505628-1
  3. ^ Template:Cite PMID
  4. ^ Template:Cite PMID PDF
  5. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1121/1.1908510, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1121/1.1908510 instead.
  6. ^ Template:Cite PMID
  7. ^ Template:Cite PMID
  8. ^ Snow CE. Ferguson CA. (1977). Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29513-0
  9. ^ Template:Cite PMID
  10. ^ a b Johnson K, Flemming E, Wright R. (1993). "The hyperspace effect: Phonetic targets are hyperarticulated". Language. 69 (3): 505–28. doi:10.2307/416697. JSTOR 416697.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links