Originalism: Revision history

9 May 2024

• curprev 22:0622:06, 9 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 25,024 bytes +33‎ flagging citation-needed to new section undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 19:1819:18, 9 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 24,991 bytes +57‎ →‎International Law and Originalism undo
• curprev 19:1719:17, 9 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 24,934 bytes +767‎ →‎Related positions: adding new international law and originalism section undo
• curprev 08:5308:53, 9 May 2024‎ Federhalter talk contribs‎ m 24,167 bytes +1‎ WP:TYPO undo

8 May 2024

• curprev 21:4121:41, 8 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 24,166 bytes −526‎ Undid revision 1222930837 by Xam2580 (talk) interpreting judicial opinions constitutes No Original Research - let's get consensus on the talk page first undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 20:3420:34, 8 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 24,692 bytes +526‎ →‎Support: returning scalia quotation from old page undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 20:3120:31, 8 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 24,166 bytes +160‎ →‎Original Meaning: adding back scalia photograph undo

7 May 2024

• curprev 22:3722:37, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 24,006 bytes +3‎ →‎Original meaning: noting that a source is needed for the first sentence, reworking the second to more closely mirror the text in the source undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 22:1922:19, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 24,003 bytes +1,425‎ Added a source to ensure scalia is recognized as a foundational contributor to originalism. This section needs more work but this scalia quotation that was originally removed seems highly useful and relevant undo
• curprev 22:0122:01, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 22,578 bytes +11‎ clarifying living constitutionalism (originalists typically believe in interpreting/applying the constitution TO modern times or CONSIDERING modern times and this point was unclear in old sentence version) undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 22,567 bytes −841‎ →‎History: removed source once again that failed to mention the term originalism, flagged the first sentence as needing a citation in and of itself and reworked the other sentence to focus more on the constitutional amendments than on specific cases undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:5720:57, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 23,408 bytes +1,036‎ →‎History: Thanks for the comments. I attempted to make a neutral topic sentence introducing this section (am open to edits) and found an additional source to ensure the avoidance of any synthesis/original research concerns about the 7th amendment and originalism discussion (which I added back). Happy to discuss if these sources are insufficient or wait to add back 7th amendment sentence until better sources are found. undo
• curprev 20:5620:56, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 22,372 bytes +71‎ →‎See also: moving democratic backsliding up to specific section and linking to a more specific section in the article undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:5020:50, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 22,301 bytes −27‎ →‎See also: removing Constitution in Exile due to rampant issues on that article undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 20:4020:40, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 22,328 bytes −622‎ →‎History: reverting one Good Faith edit and trying to work with the example to make it fit in the article - the first source does not discuss originalism making this original research, the second mentions how it is being used but could use some broader analysis of how originalism is being used to go with this one-off example undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 20:3520:35, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 22,950 bytes +366‎ →‎History: in an avoidance of doubt here is an article that DIRECTLY states the proposition and is not original research. This is to specifically address any synthesis concerns. undo
• curprev 20:2620:26, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 22,584 bytes +1,301‎ →‎History: Ok I guess we cannot have a discussion about this. Maybe this version will work for you? Please actually CLICK on the links to Bruen and the 7th amendment AND see the articles; they are NOT original research (especially the actual linked wikipedia pages themselves). Happy to discuss improvements but please do NOT just simply revert it. This is NOT original research (again see BOTH the linked pages AND the linked articles). No issues with fixing the tone if anyone still disagrees undo
• curprev 20:1620:16, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 21,283 bytes −2,099‎ Undid revision 1222765569 by Xam2580 (talk) Unencyclopedic tone, synthesis and original research undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 20:1520:15, 7 May 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 23,382 bytes +83‎ Undid revision 1222766296 by Xam2580 (talk) Unencyclopedic tone, synthesis and original research undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:5519:55, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 23,299 bytes −83‎ →‎History: made it much more factual and clear. undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 19:5019:50, 7 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 23,382 bytes +2,099‎ →‎History: This is a manual revert of part of an edit done on "21:43, 25 April 2024 edit Superb Owl". This section can be moved somewhere else or incorporated however it is well sourced, accurate and relevant. For the originalist judicial tests, there is not really an explicit source beyond the mere fact that the 7th amendment and Bruen do follow an originalist test (click on each page for this to be immediately clear). Happy to rephrase but this section is entirely accurate and sourced. undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 19:1719:17, 7 May 2024‎ JohnSon12a talk contribs‎ m 21,283 bytes +15‎ →‎See also undo
• curprev 18:5818:58, 7 May 2024‎ JohnSon12a talk contribs‎ m 21,268 bytes +1‎ →‎Debate: fixed typos undo
• curprev 18:5718:57, 7 May 2024‎ JohnSon12a talk contribs‎ m 21,267 bytes +4‎ italics undo

4 May 2024

• curprev 00:0100:01, 4 May 2024‎ Drbogdan talk contribs‎ 21,263 bytes +687‎ →‎History: add => In May 2024, conservative justices on the Supreme Court are reported to be considering new alternative interpretations of originalism.<ref name="NYT-20240429">{{cite news |last=Bazelon |first=Emily |title=How ‘History and Tradition’ Rulings Are Changing American Law - A new legal standard is gaining traction among conservative judges — one that might turn back the clock on drag shows, gun restrictions and more. ... undo

3 May 2024

• curprev 22:3322:33, 3 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 20,576 bytes +10‎ fix date error in citation undo
• curprev 22:2922:29, 3 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 20,566 bytes +296‎ adding source undo
• curprev 22:2022:20, 3 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 20,270 bytes +33‎ Clarifying originalist beliefs. Originalists operate in a common law system and do not dispute the common law evolution. They just dispute what in their view is the abuse of the common law. This subtle distinction was overlooked in the old language undo
• curprev 22:1822:18, 3 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 20,237 bytes +89‎ clarifying basic beliefs of originalism undo
• curprev 22:1222:12, 3 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 20,148 bytes +15‎ →‎History undo
• curprev 22:1122:11, 3 May 2024‎ Xam2580 talk contribs‎ 20,133 bytes +4‎ →‎History: clarified historically inaccurate statement and modify to meet NPOV undo

28 April 2024

• curprev 04:0404:04, 28 April 2024‎ GuardianH talk contribs‎ 20,129 bytes −399‎ unreliable source undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0104:01, 28 April 2024‎ GuardianH talk contribs‎ 20,528 bytes +193‎ →‎References undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0104:01, 28 April 2024‎ GuardianH talk contribs‎ 20,335 bytes +17‎ →‎References undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0004:00, 28 April 2024‎ GuardianH talk contribs‎ 20,318 bytes +225‎ →‎References undo Tag: Visual edit

26 April 2024

• curprev 18:5918:59, 26 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 20,093 bytes −1,336‎ →‎Strict constructionism: removing flagged sections and improving Barnett's views undo Tag: Visual edit

25 April 2024

• curprev 22:1222:12, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 21,429 bytes +67‎ →‎Strict constructionism: further improving inline templates - section still a mess undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 22:0922:09, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 21,362 bytes +40‎ →‎Strict constructionism: adding 'main article' template undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 22:0622:06, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 21,322 bytes −1,505‎ →‎Strict constructionism: removing sentence and four associated blog posts that did not support the sentence whatsoever undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 22:0022:00, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ m 22,827 bytes −427‎ →‎History: combining duplicate references undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:5621:56, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 23,254 bytes −258‎ →‎Strict constructionism: further significant editing and organizing text and citations into proper sections undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:5021:50, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 23,512 bytes −1,974‎ →‎Support: removing remaining unsourced, poorly-sourced and WP:NOR undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:4321:43, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 25,486 bytes −2,804‎ →‎Declarationism: removed all unsourced text in this section and right-sized so that it did not have WP:Undue weight with only one source cited in this section undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:3721:37, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 28,290 bytes 0‎ →‎Opposition: moved Sam Ervin into the 'support' section since he was a proponent undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:5420:54, 25 April 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 28,290 bytes +1,929‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:3820:38, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 26,361 bytes +40‎ →‎Declarationism: adding undue weight template undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:3520:35, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 26,321 bytes +188‎ →‎Strict constructionism: removed template for more sources needed from 2016 and added inline templates more precisely in the section undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:3220:32, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 26,133 bytes −2,679‎ →‎Methodology: removing unsourced section with potential copyright infringement for over-quoting the material undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:3120:31, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 28,812 bytes −2,148‎ →‎External links: removing unreliable sources and leaving only the most notable sources undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:2520:25, 25 April 2024‎ Superb Owl talk contribs‎ 30,960 bytes −4,642‎ →‎Discussion: removed rest of this section as pure original research undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor