Poe's law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ranze (talk | contribs) at 00:50, 20 March 2013 (→‎History: MOS:QUOTE trivial spelling and typographic errors should simply be corrected without comment, unless the slip is textually important.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between sincere extremism and an exaggerated parody of extremism.[1]

The law and its meaning

Poe's law states:

Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.[2]

The core of Poe's law is that a parody of something extreme by nature becomes impossible to differentiate from sincere extremism. A corollary of Poe's law is the reverse phenomenon: sincere fundamentalist beliefs being mistaken for a parody of that belief.[2]

History

The statement called Poe's law was formulated in 2005 by Nathan Poe on the website christianforums.com in a debate about creationism. The original sentence read:

"Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake [it] for the genuine article."[3]

The sentiments expressed by Poe date back much earlier – at least to 1983, when Jerry Schwarz in a post on Usenet wrote:[4]

8. Avoid sarcasm and facetious remarks.

Without the voice inflection and body language of personal communication these are easily misinterpreted. A sideways smile, :-), has become widely accepted on the net as an indication that "I'm only kidding". If you submit a satiric item without this symbol, no matter how obvious the satire is to you, do not be surprised if people take it seriously.

Another precedent posted on Usenet dates to 2001. Following the well-known schema of Arthur Clarke's Third law, Alan Morgan wrote:[5] "Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine kook."

The idea is also the main concept behind Kurt Vonnegut's 1961 novel Mother Night.

References

  1. ^ Aikin, Scott F. (January, 23 2009). "Poe's Law, Group Polarization, and the Epistemology of Online Religious Discourse". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 1332169. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ a b Chivers, Tom (Oct 23. 2009). "Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe". The Telegraph. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ "Big contradictions in the evolution theory". christianforums.com. August 11, 2005. Retrieved August 20, 2011.
  4. ^ "Emily Post for Usenet". November 1, 1983. (Emily Post)
  5. ^ "Bush's testing plan". February 1, 2001.

External links