Talk:Heteroscedacity

Is it just me, or is the last it an incomplete thought.

Can we add that if the assumption is violated, OLS is not an efficient estimator?

merge[edit]

Unless I'm missing something, the title of this article is just a misspelling; the first sentence spells it differently from the article title (heteroscedasticity instead of heteroscedacity). I think it should simply be merged into heteroskedasticity, or perhaps just redirected there (that article seems much more complete). --Trovatore 06:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. this should be discussed at Talk:Heteroskedasticity, not here. --Trovatore 08:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]