Talk:Claire Swire email
 | This article was nominated for deletion on October 15, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The link on the page says that the email was a hoax, but the article doesn't reflect this. Was it? --Cinephobia 09:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
No. Richard75 19:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Call for deletion
[edit]I've just done a revision which I think puts this better into context, and justifies keeping it - hence I've removed the deletion notice.--Snori 01:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]Is this article about a person or is it not? If it is, then the categories I added are valid. Valrith 19:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Fair point, but I suggest instead renaming the article to "Claire Swire email", with a redirect from "Claire Swire". Really that's what it's about - eg we have no interest in her birth date, which would be a key fact for an article on a person. I've never done a rename before, but will have a look into it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snori (talk • contribs) 17:02, 12 October 2006
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Claire Swire email. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051129234047/http://management.silicon.com:80/itdirector/0,39024673,11025866,00.htm to http://management.silicon.com/itdirector/0,39024673,11025866,00.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050312021048/http://www.epolicyinstitute.com:80/press/articles/sink.html to http://www.epolicyinstitute.com/press/articles/sink.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
What's the point of this article?
[edit]If it doesn't say what the email was about, then it's basically pointless. Richard75 (talk) 10:34, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- I've added a sentence, with a source, to summarise it. Richard75 (talk) 11:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)