Talk:Fishnet

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shouldn't "Fishnet tights" redirect here? That is after all a common usage.

Image

Is there any other image available, preferably one that is less sexual? It's obvious why some people think Wikipedia makes soft pornogrpahy available, if we examine the unnecessarily sexual images sometimes used (e.g. the image in pantyhose for men)--71.111.194.50 (talk) 13:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 I second that opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.227.133 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been my observation (and I think a more popular observation) that fishnet stockings are firstly recocognised as a classic feminine vintage style of hosiery (sometimes with attributes of fetish); more so than a look related to Punk or Gothic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.61.182.124 (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fishnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727032156/http://fishnet.mine.nu:42002/index.html to http://fishnet.mine.nu:42002/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]