Jump to content

Talk:Hopkins, Minnesota

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Distance

[edit]

As a denzien of Hopkins, I must question where the distance measurement comes from. St. Louis Park/Edina are the only cities between Hopkins and Minneapolis, and they aren't anywhere near 13 miles wide. It's possible that it's being measured from downtown to downtown, but that's a kinda silly way to measure distance between two almost entierly developed cities, and even if it were to stand, there should be some sort of comment saying where the measurements are from, boarder to boarder or center to center. Thanatosimii 21:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You my good sir are quite mistaken. Take that street that goes by the city, its st. louis park, (with Edina to the south) then Minneapolis. Nothing in between --Donatj 03:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't understand what you just said. Could you rephrase it? I still protest that it couldn't be anywheres near 13 miles. I'm staring at a map right now, it couldn't be much more than 2 miles boarder to boarder. Thanatosimii 05:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the error comes from a wholesale lifting of text out of [1], which says that Hopkins is 13 minutes west. Minutes, not miles. Quite different. Thanatosimii 05:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Person

[edit]

Why is Jeffrey Lee Parson, of Blaster fame, not here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.139.118 (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HopkinsLogo.jpg

[edit]

Image:HopkinsLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Hopkins, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]