Talk:Maud Green

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Maud Green, Lady Parr)

Dates[edit]

The birth and death dates given in the article come from Maud's tombstone in Blackfriars Church.jeanne (talk) 06:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Susan James "Catherine Parr"[edit]

Most of these quotes came from Susan James' book. Also, Catherine Parr was the first child of Maud and Sir Thomas Parr. I'm not quite sure where or who decided to change these facts around. It is really quite sad that a lot of people with IP addresses decide to come on here and mess around with historic facts. It just goes to show that you cannot trust wikipedia -- which most people take as the truth. It's frustrating trying to keep up these pages. -- Lady Meg (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Greene Line[edit]

There seems to be a discrepancy here. An actual plague has been photographed from the church where the Greene's are buried in Greens Norton. Catherine Parr Pedigree. There are also pictures of the tombs. Then there are sources like Plantagenet Ancestry, Burke's Royal Families, and others omitting the generation of Sir Thomas Greene and Marina Belers. The Plantagenet book even goes as far as saying that Marina was the 2nd wife of Sir Thomas Greene who married Philippa Ferrers; that Thomas and Marina only had three daughters and Marina went on to marry Nicholas Griffin. Any help would be nice as I'm getting a headache trying to figure this out! -- Lady Meg (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would say Douglas Richardson is more trustworthy than a plaque put up by some society in a church.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would you happen to know how to put the pages back to before they were changed or do I have to do that manually? -- Lady Meg (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Nevermind -- figured out how to do it.[reply]

Notes and References[edit]

The notes and references are very confusing here. Instead of numbering the notes, perhaps they should be put in bullets? Plus, Martienssen isn't exactly the most updated book on Catherine Parr's family. -- Lady Meg (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]