Talk:OGLE-2003-BLG-235L

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discrepancies between this article and the linked database[edit]

  1. exoplanet.eu has the orbital radius listed as 5.1 (± 1.6) AU, instead of the 4.3 (± 2.5) AU listed here.
  2. The distance of the star is listed as 5.2 kpc instead of the 5.8 kpc we have listed here.
  3. Its apparent magnitude of 19.7 was not listed, although I've listed it now. Does WP:SYN prevent me from using a calculated value of absolute magnitude?

I would fix the first two points if I felt confident enough that I wasn't missing something. As a layperson (with a Masters in Physics/Astronomy), I know just enough to be dangerous. It also took me a while to realize that the discrepancy with the values listed at the Astrophysical Journal abstract were caused by the incorrect assumptions listed in the first paragraph of the Lens system section. Ben Hocking (talk|contribs) 14:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on OGLE-2003-BLG-235/MOA-2003-BLG-53. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]