Talk:Route 491 (Pennsylvania–Delaware)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

review
  • I made a few edits that you're free to revert.[1], mostly expanding names for clarification.
  • What is a "Legislative Route"?
  • Should make clear CSX's Philadelphia Subdivision.CSX is a railroad. This is a railroad crossing?
  • Clarified it's a railroad line. It is a railroad crossing. Dough4872 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
    b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
    b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    c. no original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    no edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]