Talk:Shadowrun (1993 video game)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bridies (talk · contribs) 10:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing. bridies (talk) 10:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Review so far (have only read down to the development section and have been called away)~~ Done:

1 Lead should summarise the article. It needs to summarise the critical commentary and mention the main development points.

Might want to clarify this sentence, which raises eyebrows: Upon leaving the morgue.... Leaving a morgue alive is not exactly an everyday occurrence; he just gets up and walks out?

2 Battles within Shadowrun often require sharp reflexes and This is further complicated by the fact that the Seattle in the game is a tough city - practically every screen contains at least one hidden assassin who... need cites.
3 Broad, just about. Lack of reviews means it's just scraping, but we have verifiable statements that it was critically acclaimed and commercially successful, plus the later commentary, so meets the minimum IMO.
4 Neutral
5 Stable
6 Improve the screenshot FUR.

Actually the screenshot should be rather replaed by something that is not such a blatant spoiler. --Niemti (talk) 15:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fail Doesn't seem like this should be a big deal to fix, but the lead still doesn't summarise anything from development or the critical commentary, and now has a clean up tag. bridies (talk) 01:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It summarized "anything from critical commentary", you removed it. --Niemti (talk) 02:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By "critical commentary" I mean "reception" and "legacy". bridies (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]