Talk:Wayland's Smithy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Archaeology (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject England (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Just FYI - Radiohead filmed their early video for "Pop is Dead" at this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.32.131 (talk) 23:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Template:Megalith[edit]

I've created a new template for megalithic sites, Template:Megalith, as used on Pikestones and Round Loaf. Some instructions on the template talk page, to show how to use it. Cheers! --PopUpPirate 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Silver coin[edit]

I have edited the sentence which talked of leaving the 'smallest silver coin (a groat)'. This was evidently wrong as a groat was worth 4d and there were many smaller denomination silver coins (pennies, ha'pennies and farthings) at various times in history. My correction simply mentions 'a small silver coin', without being more specific. 86.166.19.106 (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Merger proposal[edit]

I saw a merger proposal tag on the main article. Whoever proposed it does not seem to be confident enough of the proposal to give any reason why it should take place. Nevertheless, here's my vote:

This appears to be consensus (well, all participants are in agreement). I'll remove the 'proposed merger' tag. Daicaregos (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)