Third-party logistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Third party logistics)
Jump to: navigation, search

A third-party logistics provider (abbreviated 3PL, or sometimes TPL) is a firm that provides service to its customers of outsourced (or "third party") logistics services for part, or all of their supply chain management functions. Third party logistics providers typically specialize in integrated operation, warehousing and transportation services that can be scaled and customized to customers' needs based on market conditions, such as the demands and delivery service requirements for their products and materials. Often, these services go beyond logistics and include value-added services related to the production or procurement of goods, i.e., services that integrate parts of the supply chain. When this integration occurs, the provider is then called a third-party supply chain management provider (3PSCM) or supply chain management service provider (SCMSP). 3PL targets a particular function in supply management, such as warehousing, transportation, or raw material provision.[1]

Definition[edit]

According to the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, 3PL is defined as "a firm that provides multiple logistics services for use by customers. Preferably, these services are integrated, or bundled together, by the provider. Among the services 3PLs provide are transportation, warehousing, cross-docking, inventory management, packaging, and freight forwarding."

Advantages[edit]

Cost and time savings[edit]

As logistics is the core competence of third party logistics providers. They possess better know how and a greater expertise as any producing or selling company could be able. This know how together with the global networks of the often large company size enables a higher time and cost efficiency. Another point is, that the equipment and the IT systems of 3PL providers are constantly updated and adapted to new requirement of their customers, so that they are able to meet the requirements of their customer’s suppliers. And that is more than essential to a company’s survival. Producing or selling companies often do not have the time, resources or expertise to adapt their equipment and systems as quickly as necessary. So in conclusion a 3PL provider can meet the technical requirements in a faster and more cost efficient way than a company could do itself.[2]

Low capital commitment[edit]

The fact that most or all operative functions are outsourced to a 3PL provider means there is no need for the client to own its own warehouse or transport facilities, lowering the amount of capital required for the client's business. This is particularly beneficial if a company has high variations in warehouse capacity utilization, because a bad capacity utilization ratio at equal fixed cost (for warehouse) will reduce a company’s profitability.[3]

Focus[edit]

The outsourcing of logistics departments permits the company to focus even more on their core business. If logistics is one of the firms’ core businesses then outsourcing doesn’t make sense. But if logistics is no core competency but rather needed or annoying attachment it should be outsourced to a logistics provider, because the continuous increasing of business complexity makes it impossible to be an expert in every division or sector.[4] And if you are no expert in a division, there is always the opportunity to improve. Often only the core competency is really adding value to your product. So it is immensely important to be best in class or one of the market leaders to generate profits, because normally the quality of the core product is the main (not the only, but the main!) reason for the consumer to buy it.

Flexibility[edit]

Third party logistics provider can provide a much higher flexibility in geographic aspects and can offer a much larger variety of services than the clients could provide for themselves. In addition to that, the client gets flexibility in resources and workforce size and logistics fix costs turn into variable costs.[2]

Disadvantages[edit]

Loss of control[edit]

One particular disadvantage is the loss of control a client has by working with third party logistics. Eminently in outbound logistics when the 3PL provider completely assumes the communication and interacting with a firm's customer or supplier. By having a good and continuous communication with their clients, most 3PL’s counter and try to charm away such doubts. Some 3PL’s even paint the clients logos on their assets and vest their employees like the clients ones.[5]

IT[edit]

The IT systems of the provider and the client must operate together.

Types[edit]

Third-party logistics providers include freight forwarders, courier companies, as well as other companies integrating & offering subcontracted logistics and transportation services. Hertz and Alfredsson (2003) describe four categories of 3PL providers:[6]

  • Standard 3PL Provider: this is the most basic form of a 3PL provider. They would perform activities such as, pick and pack, warehousing, and distribution (business) – the most basic functions of logistics. For a majority of these firms, the 3PL function is not their main activity.
  • Service Developer: this type of 3PL provider will offer their customers advanced value-added services such as: tracking and tracing, cross-docking, specific packaging, or providing a unique security system. A solid IT foundation and a focus on economies of scale and scope will enable this type of 3PL provider to perform these types of tasks.
  • The Customer Adapter: this type of 3PL provider comes in at the request of the customer and essentially takes over complete control of the company's logistics activities. The 3PL provider improves the logistics dramatically, but does not develop a new service. The customer base for this type of 3PL provider is typically quite small.
  • The Customer Developer: this is the highest level that a 3PL provider can attain with respect to its processes and activities. This occurs when the 3PL provider integrates itself with the customer and takes over their entire logistics function. These providers will have few customers, but will perform extensive and detailed tasks for them.[7]

Outsourcing may involve a subset of an operation's logistics, leaving some products or operating steps untouched because the in-house logistics is able to do better or cheaper than an external provider.[5] Another important point is the customer orientation of the 3PL provider. The provider has to fit to the structures and the requirements of the company. This fit is more important than the pure cost savings, like a survey of 3Pl providers shows clearly: The customer orientation in form of adaptability to changing customer needs, reliability and the flexibility of third party logistics provider were mentioned as much more important than pure cost savings.[8]

Experts often suggest firms to choose 3PL providers with roots in the same area of logistics as the department that shall be outsourced.

Furthermore it is worth to discuss if the company wants an asset-owning or a non-asset-owning 3PL Provider. 3PL provider without own assets are called lead logistics providers. Lead logistics provider have the advantage that they have specialized industry expertise combined with low overhead costs, but lower negotiation power and less resources than a third party provider has, based on a normally big company size, a good customer base and established network systems. But 3Pl providers tend to shed clients efficiency consciously by preferring their own assets in order to maximize their own efficiency. In addition to that third party logistics provider often are bureaucratic and have long decision making cycles caused by the size of the company.[9][10]

Layers[edit]

First party logistics providers (1PL) are single service providers in a specific geographic area that specialize in certain goods or shipping methods.[11] Examples are: carrying companies, port operators, depot companies.[11] The logistics department of a producing firm can also be a first party logistics provider if they have own transport assets and warehouses.

Second party logistics providers (2PL) are service providers which provide their specialized logistics services in a larger (national) geographical area than the 1PL do. Often there are frame contracts between the 2PL and the customer, which regulate the conditions for the transport duties that are mostly placed short term. 2PL’s provide own and external logistics resources like trucks, forklifts, warehouses etc. for transport, handling of cargo or warehouse management activities.[11] Second party logistics arouse in the course of the globalization and the uprising trend of lean management, when the companies began to outsource their logistics activities to focus on their own core companies. Examples are: courier, express and parcel services; ocean carriers, freight forwarders and transshipment providers.[12]

The most significant difference between a second party logistics provider and a third party logistics provider is the fact that a 3Pl is always integrated in the customs system. The 2 Pl is not integrated, in contrast to the 3Pl he is only an outsourced logistics provider with no system integration. A 2Pl works often on call (e.g. express parcel services) whereas a 3Pl is almost every time informed about the workload of the near future. Another point that differs 2 and 3PL is the specification and customizing of services. A 2Pl normally only provides standardized services. 3Pl’s against it often provide services that are customized and specialized on the needs of their customer. This is possible by the long term contracts that are usual in the third party logistics market. So the if there are customized logistics services are needed the contracts in the 3PL segment have to be long term, because customizing always costs money. A cost effectiveness for the third party logistics provider is only given over longer periods of time with a stable contract and stable profits. In contrast to that second party logistic services can’t be customized, concerning to the fluctuating market with hard competition and a price battle on a low level. And there we have another distinguishing point between 2PL and 3PL: Durability of contracts. 3 PL contracts are long term contracts, whereas 2Pl contracts are of a low durability, so that the customer is flexible in responding to market and price changes.

With companies operating globally, the need to increase supply chain visibility and reduce risk, improve velocity and reduce costs – all at the same time – requires a common technological solution.[13] Non-asset based providers perform functions such as consultation on packaging and transportation, freight quoting, financial settlement, auditing, tracking, customer service and issue resolution. However, they do not employ any truck drivers or warehouse personnel, and they don’t own any physical freight distribution assets of their own – no trucks, no storage trailers, no pallets, and no warehousing. A non-assets based provider consists of a team of domain experts with accumulated freight industry expertise and information technology assets. They fill a role similar to freight agents or brokers, but maintain a significantly greater degree of “hands on” involvement in the transportation of products. These providers are 4PL and 5PL services.

A fourth party logistics provider has no own transport assets or warehouse capacity. They have an allocative and integration function within a supply chain with the aim of increasing the efficiency of it. The idea of a fourth-party logistics provider was born in the seventies by the consulting company Accenture. Firms are outsourcing their selection of third party logistics provider and the optimization process of the integration of these to a PL as an intermediary. That reduces costs and the 4Pl have to have an overview about the whole logistics market to choose the ideal 3Pl for all operative logistic activities. For being able to provide such an ideal solution fourth party logistics providers need a good knowledge of the logistics branch and a good IT infrastructure. A fourth party logistics provider selects the 3 Pl providers from the market which are most suitable for the logistical issues of his customer. Unlike the allocative function of a 4PL in the supply chain, the core competence of a 3Pl provider is the operative logistics.

Fifth party logistics providers (5PL) provide supply chain management and offer system oriented consulting and supply chain management services to their customers.[12] Advancements in technology and the associated increases in supply chain visibility and inter-company communications have given rise to a relatively new model for third-party logistics operations – the “non-asset based logistics provider.”

On-demand transportation[edit]

On-demand transportation is a relatively new term coined by 3PL providers to describe their brokerage, ad-hoc, and "flyer" service offerings. On-demand transportation has become a mandatory capability for today's successful 3PL providers in offering client specific solutions to supply chain needs.

These shipments do not usually move under the "lowest rate wins" scenario and can be very profitable to the 3PL that wins the business. The cost quoted to customers for on-demand services are based on specific circumstances and availability and can differ greatly from normal "published" rates.

On-demand transportation is a niche that continues to grow and evolve within the 3PL industry.

Specific modes of transport that may be subject to the on-demand model include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • FTL, or Full Truck Load
  • Hotshot (direct, exclusive courier)
  • Next Flight Out, sometimes also referred to as Best Flight Out (commercial airline shipping)
  • International Expedited

On-demand transportation is a term to reflect what have become known as "smile and dial" brokerages that essentially work as telemarketing call centers. Brokers have no obligation to successfully ship all loads (as opposed to contract logistics providers) and almost all sales representatives are heavily (and 100%) commissioned, and much of the workers' day is spent cold-calling sales leads. Smile-and-dial brokerages typically require a 15% gross profit margin (the difference between what the shipper pays the brokerage and what the brokerage pays the carrier), and the commission compensation scheme means that the turnover of personnel in the call centers approaches 100% per year.

For the occasional shipper, smile-and-dial brokerages can provide a convenient way to have goods shipped. But the lack of deep expertise due to constant turnover, combined with the 15% pricing margins, mean that a reasonably capable traffic professional can obtain transportation services much more economically and reliably.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Outsourcing Transport and Warehousing: Pricing, Honesty and Contentious Issues" Published in Australian Freight Logistics Magazine. Retrieved 2014-3-25.
  2. ^ a b Simchi-Levi and Kaminsky, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts,Strategies and Case Studies, third edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, page 251.
  3. ^ de:Third Party Logistics
  4. ^ Simchi-Levi and Kaminsky, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts,Strategies and Case Studies, third edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, page 250
  5. ^ a b Simchi-Levi and Kaminsky, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts,Strategies and Case Studies, third edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, page 252
  6. ^ Hertz, Susanne; Monica Alfredsson (February 2003). "Strategic development of third party logistics providers". Industrial Marketing Management (Elsevier Science) 32 (2): pp. 139–149. doi:10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00228-6. 
  7. ^ Martin Murray, "Selecting a Third Party Logistics (3PL) Provider", www.about.com
  8. ^ Leahy, S.; P. Murphy; and R. Poist. Determinants of Successful Logistics Relationships: A third Party Provider Perspective, Transport Journal Nr. 35, 1995, Pages:5-13
  9. ^ Simchi-Levi and Kaminsky, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts,Strategies and Case Studies, third edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, page 253
  10. ^ Arno Heck, Strategische Allianzen, Springer Verlag pp. 47+48
  11. ^ a b c H.Brumme, N. Schröter,I. Schröter, Supply Chain Management und Logistik, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart 2010, Seite 15
  12. ^ a b de:Logistikdienstleister
  13. ^ Supply Chain Visibility is ranked top priority. Again.