Upside beta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 14:00, 18 March 2020 (Add: issue. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by User:AManWithNoPlan | All pages linked from User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In investing, upside beta is the element of traditional beta that investors do not typically associate with the true meaning of risk.[1] It is defined to be the scaled amount by which an asset tends to move compared to a benchmark, calculated only on days when the benchmark’s return is positive.

Formula

Upside beta measures this upside risk. Defining and as the excess returns to security and market , as the average market excess return, and Cov and Var as the covariance and variance operators, the CAPM can be modified to incorporate upside (or downside) beta as follows.[2]

with downside beta defined with the inequality directions reversed. Therefore, and can be estimated with a regression of excess return of security on excess return of the market, conditional on excess market return being below the mean (downside beta) and above the mean (upside beta)."[3] Upside beta is calculated using asset returns only on those days when the benchmark returns are positive. Upside beta and downside beta are also differentiated in the dual-beta model.

See also

References

  1. ^ James Chong; Yanbo Jin; G. Michael Phillips (April 29, 2013). "The Entrepreneur's Cost of Capital: Incorporating Downside Risk in the Buildup Method" (PDF). p. 2. Retrieved 26 June 2013.
  2. ^ Bawa, V.; Lindenberg, E. (1977). "Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework". Journal of Financial Economics. 5 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90017-4.
  3. ^ Bawa, V.; Lindenberg, E. (1977). "Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework". Journal of Financial Economics. 5 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90017-4.

External links