User talk:YborCityJohn/CVUA
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:TheGoofyGolfer/CVUA)
- This page is now CLOSED to any further discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made to User_talk:TheGoofyGolfer. No further edits, additions or changes should be made to this page under any circumstance. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 01:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notice: This page is for the discussion of my involvement in the Wikipedia CVUA program, it is not for general discussion, if you wish to ask or have a general comment or question please direct it to User talk:TheGoofyGolfer otherwise off-topic discussions will be deleted without response. Thank you.
CVUA[edit]
Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Invite-rollback Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to the CVUA![edit]
Hi there! I'd love to be your instructor here at the CVUA - let me know if this is okay, and, if so, when you'll be available. Can't wait! :) Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 19:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am available ASAP, let me know. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 01:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fantastic! To get things started, please take a look at WP:VAND,WP:WARN and WP:GAIV, and let me know if you have any questions. I'll be glad to answer them! Right now, our goal is to get you 100% familiar with "The Big Four Steps", that is Identify, Restore, Warn, Report... but ah, there is so much to do. :) Just become familiar with those articles, and then we can get started with the cool stuff... reverting vandalism! Theopolisme TALK 03:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey there - you said you'd take a look at these quite a few hours ago, just checking in. No worries - and if I'm messaging you too much, let me know and I'll lay off the steam for a bit. Theopolisme TALK 02:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fantastic! To get things started, please take a look at WP:VAND,WP:WARN and WP:GAIV, and let me know if you have any questions. I'll be glad to answer them! Right now, our goal is to get you 100% familiar with "The Big Four Steps", that is Identify, Restore, Warn, Report... but ah, there is so much to do. :) Just become familiar with those articles, and then we can get started with the cool stuff... reverting vandalism! Theopolisme TALK 03:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I'm here...[edit]
OMG I am so Sorry... I got off track for a bit, our daughter has a urinal-trac infection and we had to take her to the doctor then two days later our son got the chicken poxs. Just finished reading everything tonight so what's the next step? TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 02:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Also I do have a question, if I find an edit on a Wikipedia article and I'm not sure if it is a good faith edit or just someone being an idiot and posting vandalism, that is to say posting something that doesn't look like vandalism but is and I'm not talking about something like an edit that says "Ba Ba Booey" or "Howard Stern Rules", "Madonna Sucks" etc.. I mean wording that is subtle. How do you tell positively when someone is just posting something naively or it is blatent vandalism disguised to look like a normal edit? TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 02:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- First of all, no problem! I'm actually rather busy this week as well (in DC, actually, for a national science competition), but don't worry about not being here <-- we're all volunteers! :)
- Determining between good faith and vandalistic edits isn't something that comes immediately. For now, I think your best step when coming to those types of edits is actually coming to me, as your instructor, so I can help you recognize those subtle details, and eventually make it so you don't even have to think about it.
- The next step is actually deciding what you want to learn from the CVUA - are in you interested in WP:Twinkle? Or would you prefer manual vandalism reverts? Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 09:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd probably choose Twinkle over manual reverts. Should I go into my preferences and activate it now or wait until you tell me to activate it? TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 02:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Go ahead and activate it, and I recommend just using it - there's a slight learning curve, but it comes quickly. Definitely read through the manuals here, and let me know if you have any other questions -- otherwise, I'll just watch your Twinkle edits and let you know my thoughts. Theopolisme TALK 08:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've been checking out your Twinkle contributions, and you seem to have a clear grasp at what vandalism is and is not, as well as some serious TW-Skills! Nice work! Seriously, let me know if you have any questions or whatnot... but otherwise, I think you are totally ready to apply for rollback rights. Let me know if you do decide to do this, and I'll put in a recommendation. Honestly, I don't see much for me to do for you. :) Theopolisme TALK 03:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks, I am trying to do my best to weed out what is and what isn't vandalism and as I'm sure you saw in my edits I made a couple of faux pas along the way but I acknowledged my mistake and immediately corrected it. I have to admit that using Twinkle has made fighting the vandalism a lot easier then when I was doing it manually, everything is at a click of a button, the reversions, the warnings, the welcomes etc.. no having to take a long time of typing everything out and hopefully using Rollback will make it even easier. I do appreciate that your willing to give me a recommendation. Again thanks. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 03:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've been checking out your Twinkle contributions, and you seem to have a clear grasp at what vandalism is and is not, as well as some serious TW-Skills! Nice work! Seriously, let me know if you have any questions or whatnot... but otherwise, I think you are totally ready to apply for rollback rights. Let me know if you do decide to do this, and I'll put in a recommendation. Honestly, I don't see much for me to do for you. :) Theopolisme TALK 03:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Go ahead and activate it, and I recommend just using it - there's a slight learning curve, but it comes quickly. Definitely read through the manuals here, and let me know if you have any other questions -- otherwise, I'll just watch your Twinkle edits and let you know my thoughts. Theopolisme TALK 08:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd probably choose Twinkle over manual reverts. Should I go into my preferences and activate it now or wait until you tell me to activate it? TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 02:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a heads up I've decided that I am going to apply for Rollback privileges this afternoon. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fantastic! I'll watch the Rollback page and, once you apply, add my comments. Theopolisme TALK 19:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a heads up I've decided that I am going to apply for Rollback privileges this afternoon. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]