Talk:Property management/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Merging

I do not think this should be merged with Property Maintenance. The term Property Management is more about Landlords, Tenants and Property Investment in general. Maintenance is more about practical do it yourself type of topics. Please leave this in tact and give people a chance to add to this article so it becomes more about property investment - such as looking for management contracts etc.

I agree. There is a distinct difference between the two rendering the merger inappropiate.

I concur. I work in various property businesses in the UK and the term Property Maintenace is about the up keep of building both internal and external. Property management is the business end of property investment - managing tenants and rent. Maintenace is one part of property management also. Not the same thing.

I agree. In terms of the life cycle management of immovable assets, property management will play a significant role during the planning, acquisition, and disposal phases of such an asset's life cycle. The facilities (facility) management function (operation and maintenance, amongst other tasks or duties) will take over the management of the asset during the operational phase of its life cycle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhowitson (talk • contribs) 07:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Software ref

In case the list article is deleted, it has one reference: --Ronz (talk) 00:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Antoniak, Michael (1 April 2007). "Buyer's Guide: Property Management". RealtorMag. Retrieved 1 November 2012.

Merger of Property management business models

I propose merging a new article, Property management business models into this one, property management, instead of deleting it as proposed by another editor. If there are no objections by next week, I will do the merge myself. Bearian (talk) 20:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

I have already thrown that article into this one. Why don't you move it if necessary from where it landed to its destination?--Laun chba ller 20:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Done