This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
Hi @Викидим I saw you requested the deletion of the page AXN Movies (Portugal). What was the problem with that page and which sources should I add for keeping that article? Filippo.g204 (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the relevant notability guideline (WP:NCORP). In particular, WP:SIRS renders almost all the sources ("AXN Black") currently in the article unacceptable, as they are not independent (see #2). The sole remaining (filmSPOT) source appears to be a WP:PRIMARY source (offers " an insider's view of an event") thus failing #4. Викидим (talk) 10:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Викидим I added more informations from independent sources: how do you think bout that article now? Filippo.g204 (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that this is a WP:PROD: anyone disagreeing with it can simply remove the hatnote (this still allows for a more robust WP:AFD process). I would prefer someone else to review the new situation and will not do either. Викидим (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]