User talk:Giraffasaurus

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Giraffasaurus. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! KonveyorBelt 00:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Konveyor Belt. Thanks. Giraffasaurus (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked indef as yet another Kumioko sock. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giraffasaurus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Floquenbeam accused me of being another user named Kumioko and then I left them a comment at the SPI page that they should provide some proof rather than accusations and noted that they should notify the user when they accuse them of something. There is nothing in this statement anywhere that states admission that I am this person? Absolutely nothing! I simply posted that you should notify people when you accuse them of something. Giraffasaurus (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A clear sockpuppetry manifestation, and no valid reason advanced to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For ease, here is a copy of the statement I made there:

Thank you very much Floquenbeam for not providing me a link to this insinuation. If you feel like blocking me for adding project tags, creating articles and doing positive edits please do so. I can just create another account later if I want to edit, its really not that big of a deal. But for a project that claims to want more editors you are trying pretty hard to make sure they can't get done.

Giraffasaurus (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

Note for reviewing admin: the part in the response is "I can just create another account later if I want to edit, its really not that big of a deal." Classic Kumioko. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Floquenbeam you really need to walk away from this editor. You are a disgrace as an admin and an embarrassment. Your ongoing conduct with telling editors to shoo, to fuck off and your general demeanor are completely unacceptable on this site. Personally, I feel its editors and admin like you that make this site from gaining more contributors and I sincerely hope that at some point the community sees the net negative you are to this project and shows you the door. Again, unblock me or not, its irrelevant. I intend to continue to contribute positively and I have made up my mind that the project needs the edits more than it needs admins like you preventing them. Giraffasaurus (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well crap, You just broke my irony detector. Luckily, these days I buy them by the gross. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help but wonder what the result would be to me if I, as an editor, told you to "Shoo" or to "Fuck off" as you have done so many times to others as an admin. Would I get blocked or would that be acceptable conduct as a non admin? Giraffasaurus (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should revert all my edits then[edit]

Anthony Bradbury If my edits are not wanted then I encourage you to go and undo them. Please delete the new articles I created as well as the talk pages I added WikiProject banners too. You should revert all the Vandalism I reverted, the vandals I reported and unsubmit all the empty categories I submitted to Speedy deletion. If you do this, I will not continue to edit. If you leave these edits in place I will infer that the edits are wanted and I shall continue doing them regardless of useless and unfair blocks and accusations. Giraffasaurus (talk) 18:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]