User talk:Megan85a

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Megan85a, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Singularity42 (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Megan85a. You have new messages at Singularity42's talk page.
Message added 13:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Singularity42 (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for spamming legal services site[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Megan85a (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was intending to make a valid contribution of the topic that was not covered, and citing a news link on the subject. I am respectfully asking to be unblocked and will be more careful of the quality of the link which is sourced in the future. Megan85a (talk) 02:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The purpose of the account does appear to be the addition of spam links for legal services. The contribution history combined with a lack of response to the follow-up questions below have led me to decline your unblock request. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you really think that the intent of your account is not obvious at this point? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking very much the same. What links were you planning to add in the future? Peridon (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]