User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 34

Image:Wickedmain.png

Hello Phaedriel, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Wickedmain.png) was found at the following location: User:Phaedriel/Today/4. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

E-mail?

I read you loud and clear. :) I'll try and contact you today but I may not be able to as I'm going to San Francisco tomorrow. Either way you should hear from me by the middle of the week. ;) —  $PЯINGrαgђ  08:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Favoritism

It seems that even Phaedriel displays admin favoritism. (Click on each word) :) --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey! Not fair! :( Not all are admins... Phaedriel - 04:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

That part I knew. But every one since the 11th has been. (Since you're replying below my message, maybe you finally read the message on my user talk saying to reply where I leave the message :)) --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow, the things you notice when you have nothing better to do with your time. :) Karrmann 04:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, I know a lot of admins, and when I check for Phaedriel's person of the day, I've noticed it's been an admin for the past few. (I'm probably causing and edit conflict for Phaedriel right now :)) --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Everyone will get a day, regardless of their mop-wielding status, dear - but I just can only have one person each day, and the last streak simply happened to have many admins. But I can think of at least 5 non-admins that will get their days pretty soon, you'll see ;) Btw, I'm glad you like your new userpage! Love, Phaedriel - 04:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, you never know. Maybe it is just a coincidence. Sharon has never hit me off as biased, she seems to love each editor equally :) Isn't taht right Sharon? Karrmann 04:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

When you're here for 1 year, 2 months, and 26 days (according to the cool auto-counting userbox on my page), you get to know most of the common people/admins. --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, then that means I have been here longer than you. I have been here over a couple of years buddy ;) Karrmann 04:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Frankly, the thought that I was picking "too many admins" had not ocurred to me until commented here and now. I tend to believe I try to treat everybody equally, admins or not, and in fact some of the best friends I've made here are not. I swear that my selection has not been biased, and that I simply pick people because of their merits, both human and encyclopedic. It's sad to think I may give the idea that I have any kind of preferences or bias when all I try is to cheer people up. Phaedriel - 04:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Phaedriel, I was just kidding! :) --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Argh! I'm gonna kill you, Teck :) Why is it so easy to pull my leg? I guess I'm just too naif! ;) Phaedriel - 04:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I guess so. Well, I'm going to go to finish watching the best late at night show ever. It's 12:52 A.M. where I am. (And by the way...so did you see my message about replying below that I've had on my talk page forever?) --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Yep I did :) Enjoy the show! Phaedriel - 04:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow, I believed it too! Hey, I'll second you on Conan. I nearly died laughing when he did his newest US stamps series. It is abotu 12:55 here. Karrmann 04:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The one tonight? Yeah, that one was funny, and I guess we're in the same timezone. Buona notte amica. --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 04:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

{indent reset] I live in Detroit, so I assume you are in the midwest. Karrmann 05:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

No. I'm in the east. I thought you said it was 12:5? where you were. That's what time it was for more. It's now 1:09 now for me. --TeckWiz is now R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 05:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

It is 1:17 when I wrote this. Karrmann 05:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

It is half one in the morning here, but I didn't stay up late; I just now got up. ;) —  $PЯINGrαgђ  08:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

hey when do I get a day? Oh, and you and R need to get a room or something... ;) – Gurch 23:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think Phaedriel would blend in with the people in jail. :) --R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 05:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You made my day!

Hey, Phaedriel, thanks for the recognition, especially with a superbly apt quotation. I can't say much now, cuz I'm off to play tennis for a couple of hours, but I really do appreciate your kindness :) Cheers, Moreschi ^Talk 15:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Ebilshroom

Sharon, it looks like game over for our friend user:Ebilshroom. After he vandalized your talk page, an admin came around and blocked him. Karrmann 18:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Too bad he decided it was funny to vandalize my Talk page... I was starting to feel optimistic about the kid. Oh well, at least we managed to make him stop his vandalism spree a couple of days ago... Phaedriel - 18:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Yep. I thought that we could make him into a good editor, but I guess he has shown his true motives.... BTW, is anything wrong, your mood meter is pretty low. Karrmann 19:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

What's wrong?

Hi Sharon, I noticed this change on your talk page. What's wrong, dear? You can contact me privately if you prefer. Love, Kyoko 19:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I am wondering the same thing. Is anyone bothering you? Karrmann 20:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

My thoughts exactly. I will do most anything (except vandalise) to cheer you up, it's the least I can do. :( --Endo(Exo) 21:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

:-( - Alison ☺ 21:57, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

(edit conflict)R is wondering also. --R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's go Yankees!) 21:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Just some personal stuff, friends, don't worry... I'll survive :) It's just in case you wonder why I'm a little more distant than usual. Thanks for your concern. XXX, Phaedriel - 02:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Cue the Gloria Gaynor! Now, excuse me while I make some easy cash :) Will ^{(We're flying the flag all over the world)} 02:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok, Sharon. Thanks for the response, I wish you the best! Karrmann 01:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Haha, kudos dearie, you can make it! (Thanks for keeping an eye on the vandal for me!) --Endo(Exo) 02:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk: United States

I have removed them because the problems discussed in each one are solved.Abdalla 21:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Phaedriel. Thank you for the very nice words you wrote on my talk page and for the poem at the link for the record of the day (that's a beautiful poem indeed, the best one written in Romanian, perhaps). I am very glad that you are around spreading the wiki-love among people! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes

By looking at your userpage, you seem really skilled with designing and fine-tuning wikipedia. I wanted to ask if you can help me in designing useboxes. I already looked at the guide (wikipedia:userboxes) but it all seems to confusing. Any hints? Thanks, Abdalla 01:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I, Sean William, award you with the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for going the extra mile to be nice without being asked. Working with you has been a pleasure, thanks to your pleasant disposition and perpetually cheery attitude. I'm amazed. Keep up the good work. Sean William 03:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

PalestineRemembered

Hi, I've added to the discussion over at ANI. His edits are well within the spirit of the block that was imposed on him. He must be granted natural justice, which includes the ability to defend himself. At the moment, his ArbCom case is turning into a circus. His supporters are adding "evidence" in his defence, when no accusations have been made. It makes them sound like a bunch of raving lunatics, and lets his accusers tailor their evidence to counter his defence.

Note that CSN did not impose a permanent ban on him as claimed by John254. There was no consensus, and the original complaint was based on an invalid claim. PR accepted the block during his ArbCom case on my advice in an attempt to keep tempers down, and help the ArbCom case progress in a timely manner. Mark Chovain 05:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I give in but I wish the system would change

Ok, I then give in about writing an article about one of the most famous salsa bands in the world, Los Soneros del Barrio. But I think that the current system for article approval doesn't work. Someone (also a moderator perhaps, or selected by a moderator) with knowledge of salsa bands should _in advance_ make a list of unquestionably acceptable groups for the moderators. So people wanting to contribute to Wikipedia wouldn't have to bang their heads against a weird system. So they could just attempt to write the articles and know in advance that _the topic_ of article course wouldn't be a problem. Maybe this is the wrong forum for discussing this, but then I would appreciate knowing where I should go with this idea. Cmlewan 10:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

expect a delay

Hi Sharon, I just wanted to let you know that I read your mail, and I will reply to it as soon as I can, but I need to think about your message before I can give it the reply it deserves. I also expect to be busy due to other obligations, so I may not be online so much for the time being. I'm thinking and praying for you and your wonderful baby, and I will try to respond within the next few days to a week. Love, Kyoko 12:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

About your offer

I would be more than happy if you could help me add some better designs.Here is the link to my so called,' template testing' thank you and you also have a great weekend-Arnon Chaffin ^{Got a message?} 14:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

P.S I just wanted to let you know I'm not in a big hurry for the template help, please take your time with the other things you have,best wishes-Arnon Chaffin ^{Got a message?} 19:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

User page

Would you mind decorating my user page for me? (Or telling me how to) Redmarkviolinist 20:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not MySpace. Phaedriel has better things to be doing here on Wikipedia than helping people create personal websites, like administrating and writing the encyclopedia. Phaedriel is too nice to decline these requests, unfortunately, but it really is taking up a lot of her time to deal with all of these side things. --Cyde Weys 03:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Somebodys cranky. Anyways, I think you need to take a chill pill dude. Phaedriel likes to do up people's userpages. If you give the time to read her userpage, you will see that she says there that she will do requests for userpages. I know, Wikipedia is not a contest for who has the best userpage, but I find it a little rude to just bite somebodys head off for requesting a user page from someone who openly accepts requests for userpages. If it is taking up a lot of her time, then she can note that. But, it is not your place to come around biting the heads off of people who want a nice userpage. Like take me for instance. I requested that she redo my userpage simply because it was a cluttered mess before she redid it, and it is much neater in its new design. Anyways, my point is that you should let Sharon deciede what she can or can't do, and don't be so harsh to teh other members. Kapeesh? Karrmann 03:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You both mean well, and you are both right. I must confess I am currently swamped with requests, and designing the code for a truly good userpage takes its time. While I love to do so, I must also accept new requests only as I am able to fulfill the pending ones, and I'm the one to blame for not notifying of this at my userpage. I've added a notice declining further requests at least until I clear the ones I already have. Designing userpages is cathartic, creative and a good exercise at wiki markup while helping others; but it's true that we're here to write an encyclopedia, and with so many requests, good time that could be focused to our project is distracted. Again, it's my fault for not clarifying this myself. I'll make sure to do so in the future. Thank you, Cyde and Karrmann, for making me realize of this. Love, Phaedriel - 04:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

All I can say is, you've never seen "biting somebody's head off" if you think my comment was it. My comment was civil, albeit a bit hard to swallow for those who are here for unencyclopedic pursuits. --Cyde Weys 14:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

RE Barnstars

Hi Sharon, what is your criteria for carrying Barnstars over to your userpage? (And would you mind if someone do it for you — We wouldn't want them to go missing?) Kind regards, G.A.S 14:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

To clarify: I meant when and not if with criteria, since this page is quite often archived, and you are a very busy at being nice:) – Regards, G.A.S 06:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Dear Phaedriel,

Will it be okay if I ask you to help design my user page and talk page? I would love the help I need! Optakeover 15:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Sure, thank you! You have all the time in the world! Optakeover 10:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Need Help

Hi Phaedriel, I see your very busy deigning peoples userpages, and im sorry to say you may have one more. It would be very kind of you if you can design my userpage & talk page, I have been trying myself for a long time with no success... so I resorted to asking a professional. You can leave your response on my talk page, Thank You! Abdalla 19:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You really need to quit barging her with your requests. She said that she is no longer taking requests on her page. Karrmann 20:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

PalestineRemembered block

I am not sure if my page restrictions are set in stone, but if the need rises to issue a block to him again, I would be able to find a way he can email ArbCom and present his defense if needed. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Matt Stansfield

Can you give this article - Matt Stansfield - a look? It claims to be the real name of a Wikipedia user. I've nominated it for speedy, but it needs immediate action, I feel. Even if the information were to be incorrect. --Ozgod 21:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, new user here that was sent to write an article regarding a local cultural icon. How come this keeps getting deleted, I attempted to show validity and I have at least 200 other people that would be willing to contribute to the article. Also what does a7 mean?

Why did you deleted the PLAJIA wiki article? please email me pat@plajia.com ??? ive worked hard to create this page on this Montreal music band. thank you Patrick

Hey

Hi Phaedriel, I've seen you around and just thought I'd say hi. So here it is: "Hi" :) ~Spebi 08:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I thought I was completely unknown! Lol :) ~Spebi 08:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hehehe! Well, happy editing to you lol :) ~Spebi 09:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Strategic Toolkit - why?

Hi Phaedriel. Recently deleted [Strategic Toolkit].

I am pretty new to wikipedia and the last/first article I submitted got deleted "speedy deleted". I tried to enter discussion about this but that seems to have been deleted also. I am a bit confused as the article was relevant, verifiable, objective and did not contain any advertising or policy violation that I am aware of. I am not sure that I have been given any reasons from the nominator other than "I never heard of it" and "self-promotion". Seems a pity as I am hoping to add to the article. As I say - I am new to all of this and need to know why (so I can grieve properly). I have read the relevant policies, deletion processes, guidelines etc.

Davejblair 11:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Politics of Tonga

Dear lovely Phaedriel,

I'm in a quandary, and I hope you can help me, as you have helped many others. I've opened up this virtual can of worms, and they just won't fit back in the can. But let me be more specific. This all started with free-spirited Wikipedians making all sorts of articles, templates, infoboxes, and the like all over English Wikipedia, including "Politics of XX" infoboxes for just about every country, citing "fair use" every now and again. Then the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Directors got serious and passed Wikimedia Foundation Licensing Policy Resolution of 23 March 2007. All sorts of stuff just had to go. One of the things that had to go was commons:Image:SilaTonga.svg, because it was a copyvio and fair use isn't allowed on Commons. So I decided to copy it to English Wikipedia to allow fair use here. Well, I couldn't exactly do that, because the image still existed at Commons, so I took the opportunity to give it a better name in the process, Image:Sila ʻo Tonga — Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Tonga.svg. I then went on to try to justify fair use for the image here. Oh my, compliance with all ten of the criteria in the Wikipedia Non-free content Policy is not so easy as it is made out to be! It turned out that Image:SilaTonga.svg was being used by an *gasp* infobox template Template:Politics of Tonga! Not wanting to violate policy by having an image I knew wasn't free displayed by such a template, I copied the infobox from the template to a new article Infobox Politics of Tonga. I thought this was a good compromise - the infobox could stand on its own as an article (with a somewhat weird name), it could also be used almost like a template via transclusion with a colon, and it wouldn't violate policy because it was in article namespace. I then redirected Template:Politics of Tonga to the infobox article and changed all references (Commons image to English Wikipedia image; infobox template to infobox article), and was proceeding to check my work due to some problems with the new image showing up (in anticipation of proposing deletion for Template:Politics of Tonga), when this gem appeared on my user talk page. How is it that an infobox article "doesn't negate fair use policy"? How is it that doing so "just makes a mess"? Then I found that you had deleted the infobox article via this edit the very same minute, without notice. On my copy of WP:CSD#g6, the text reads as follows: "Housekeeping. Non-controversial maintenance tasks such as temporarily deleting a page in order to merge page histories, performing a non-controversial page move like reversing a redirect, or removing a disambiguation page that only points to a single article." Which of those criteria did the infobox article qualify for? How was the infobox article nominated for "g6"? How did the article get deleted with so many entries at What links here, when all four of the templates used to implement "g6" {{{db-histmerge}}, {{db-move}}, {{db-xfd}}, and {{db-g6}}) require checking of "What links here"?

PLEASE take another look at the situation and consider undeleting Infobox Politics of Tonga.

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

Best Regards,   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Still in the user page business?

Hi Phaedriel, I noted you comment about your willingness to help with user pages. I'm great with finessing articles, but lousy when it comes to ideas or knowledge of the code for making a good user page. I am open for anything from simple ideas to a wholesale reconstruction if you want to spend the time (although I feel a bit guilty for imposing on your time). I really like the idea of the collapseable boxes to put everything into. Oh, and thanks so much for your kind comment on my RfA. Akradecki 20:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Phaedirel, thanks for the reply on my talk page...I'm responding here as there's been a bit of traffic since, and I didn't want the reply to get lost. I really appreciate your willingness to help. I fully understand the time pressure thing, too, so please don't feel any need to rush; if there's a need to back-burner anyone's requests, feel free to make mine the first. Anyway, as for colors, I like forest-y the best - deep greens, browns and redwood-maroons, with attending lighter contrasting colors. I live in a very barren and light brown desert, and I really miss the green of living things! (Okay, that's not really fair, there's a few living things out here, and the desert does have it's strange beauty, but....) As for other ideas, I really like the show-hide boxes to put lots of the stuff, and beyond that, just a nice, clean elegant look like you're so good at doing. Thanks! AKRadecki 00:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello

While looking around Wikipedia for certain NavFrame (Hide/Show) box, I came across your page (I was searching all over) and I have to say I actually stopped and read your userpage. It is rare I stop and read a userpage, but I did with yours and I have to say that you are the most interesting Wikipedian (and I mean that in a good way) I have come across.

I noticed that you said that you wished not to give your Comanche name, which is cool, but after reading your userpage and the comments left for you....I am pretty sure KindHeart would fit you perfectly....then again, that is just one polock editors opinion. Take Care....NeutralHomer ^T:C 16:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I am glad I made your day, and I "Thank You" because your words to me certainly made mine. Take Care and Have a Good Evening....NeutralHomer ^T:C 03:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

That was sweet -- Y not? 18:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

New

hello i am new i know that other ebilshroom dude, and he said he was blocked and didnt know why, so i wanted to check it out Mools 19:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC) this dude said he did it once, then stopped cuz of the phaedriel person Mools 19:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC) hey phaedriel, how did u get that name anyway? Mools 19:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Eblishroom

Hi Sharon. Our friend Eblishroom seems to want an unblock. I am not a 100% sure how that works, so I suggest that maybe you help him with this. Karrmann 20:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)Theres only 1 problem: he told his password in his edit summary,but how do we know it is really him?Arnon Chaffin ^{Got a message?} 20:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

We may need to overwrite that edit. Karrmann 20:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Can I help? - Alison ☺ 20:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

You sure can.Arnon Chaffin ^{Got a message?} 20:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

For starters, I just deleted his talk page and restored its history again, less the silly password announcement. That was not exactly clever! Admins can still see it, though, and doing that generally means an indefblock. They may have a second chance now. I've left {{unblock}} instructions on his talk page - Alison ☺ 20:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

He didnt say the pass i did cuz he isnt gonna go on anymore He also doesnt want an unblock, he just wants to know why he was blocked for no good reason

Mools 21:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• You'll have to ask the blocking admin (User:Trebor) that one. I'd say the mention of a favourite trolling dairy product - didn't help, somehow [1] - Alison ☺ 22:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Looks like I'm missing the party (kinda busy atm). I recommend you follow Allie's advice to the letter (thanks for your help, Allie! :) My girl needs attention rite now, bbl!) Phaedriel - 22:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

ill talk to ebilshroom tomorrow. Isaw his page and if hes banned, he wont be able to respond

22:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)22:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)~~

• 'sokay. He's not banned - he's blocked. And indefinitely doesn't mean permanently. If he wants to respond or whatever, he's free to edit his talk page - Alison ☺ 22:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

HE ANSWERED ON HIS T.PAGE Mools 22:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I am a tad concerned that this "Mools" may be a sockpuppet of him. Karrmann 10:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reconsideration

Thank you so much for the poem. As I edited my user page, I reconsidered my decision to leave due to all the kind words from you and others and my affection of this database of knowledge. I will make decision whether to leave or stay pending some ArbCom decisions, they will determine whether I still have faith to the fairness of Wikipedia. Again, thank you for your encouragement and kindness! Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 23:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Ping!

What's up? You okay? Email me if you need my number or need to talk/IM .... worried - Alison ☺ 05:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

My email is always open to you too (and Google Talk, but I'm going to be a bit busy until 7:30pm BST (One episode of Heroes, two episodes of 24, one exam, one 70 minute long bus journey, etc, etc), so it'd be best to email me.) Will ^{(We're flying the flag all over the world)} 10:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm back

I'm back from SF, and I'm ready. :) —  $PЯINGrαgђ  08:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Picture

Oh my goodness Sharon, Image:Psycheabduct.jpg is just beautiful. Would you mind if I "stole" it and put it on my user page somewhere?

Btw, please stop playing me at my own game, send me an email about how to contact you and we'll get talking :) Hope you're well, bye --kingboyk 10:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The Open Organization Of Lockpickers

Hi, You deleted the article I created for The Open Organization Of Lockpickers within a few minutes of creation without even adding any note to my user page or talking about it in the discussion page for the article.

It would be appreciated if you could comment or give any suggestions. There are other/similar articles existing in wikipedia and therefore I am at a loss why you would consider this as a7. Looking forward to your response.

Deepraj | Talk 10:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for responding with your suggestions on my user page (and adding an extra reference in TOOOL to boot!). I will work further now on that article and make it more informative with additional references and categorization etc. -Deepraj | Talk 08:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Boink!

Hi Sharon, I'm following here what you use for e-mail messages. Sorry for the delay, but it couldn't be helped. Love, Kyoko 23:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Sharon, no need to stress yourself by rushing your response. I'm pretty busy with work and I might be making some business trips, so really, no rush. Love ya! --Kyoko 13:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Ebilshroom

Just letting y'all know im back and ill work on the site on the side of good!!!! (Heroic theme music plays) Ebilshroom 23:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Not for much longer if we find a connnection between you and that Mools. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karrmann (talk • contribs) 07:08, May 22, 2007 (UTC)

Why????Ebilshroom 20:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

If we find out that he is your sockpuppet, you will get blocked again. but you said he isn't, so we won't have to worry about that. Karrmann 21:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

... and in the meantime, we'll assume good faith on their part and not speculate, yes? - Alison ☺ 21:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

im really editing things for real Ebilshroom 22:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Will do!

I'm actually flying out on Friday, but for 6 days only. My friend will be so happy, thank you so much! You don't even know her and you've brightened her day!--Endo(Exo) 03:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch! Considering my Today's Flower thingymabobber, do you know anyone who really deserves a present? Thanks!--Endo(Exo) 01:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm back

I added a little more to my user page, and if you happen to have time, I would be very happy if you could decorate my user page for me. Thanks! (I have finished)

Redmarkviolinist 15:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Henning Svensson

Hi, you deleted the above article after I nominated it, and it's been recreated. You may have deleted it speedily without checking, but if you stand by your decision you may want to add your 2 cents. Raerth 18:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)