User talk:Philbox17

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Réseau de Résistance du Québécois has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 03:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Réseau de Résistance du Québécois. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 03:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Front de libération du Québec. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Closedmouth (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Front de libération du Québec. Closedmouth (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 08:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Réseau de Résistance du Québécois. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 20:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Philbox17! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! sinneed (talk) 21:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I am sorry to see you are blocked.[edit]

On your return, please look over wp:3rr, it is very important. There are very few cases where it is allowed to revert an article more than 3 times in a 24 period. I made a few more changes to the article.

Are you sure that militant is the term you want? It means the organization actively uses violence to accomplish its goals.sinneed (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your post on my talk page[edit]

Your post on my talk page is way out of line. On what grounds can you presume to tell me where to go or not to go? I come and go as I please, and I visit my family and friends regularly. Get a life, buddy. Vincent (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Réseau de Résistance du Québécois[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Réseau de Résistance du Québécois. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. EdJohnston (talk) 04:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Réseau de Résistance du Québécois. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 05:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Réseau de Résistance du Québécois. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 05:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for 24h William M. Connolley (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Réseau de Résistance du Québécois[edit]

I noticed you removed the word sovereigntist from the lead section of Réseau de Résistance du Québécois and I was wondering why this word does not apply to the RRQ. Thanks! --Odie5533 (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Réseau de Résistance du Québécois[edit]

Hello, please stop practicing article ownership for Réseau de Résistance du Québécois. We all work together to make the articles better. Thank you 76.64.152.111 (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI on your actions on above article[edit]

Hello, Philbox17. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Versa geek 02:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]