User talk:Privatecase

Private Case (Library Collection)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Private Case (Library Collection), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Private Case. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Private Case (Library Collection)[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Private Case (Library Collection). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Private Case. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Private Case - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ttonyb (talk) 06:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Private Case (company)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Private Case (company), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.privatecase.fi/en/company. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Private Case (company)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Private Case (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Grondemar 07:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

You may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. –Grondemar 07:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Private Case (company). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. –Grondemar 07:52, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Private Case (Library Collection). Wintonian (talk) 07:52, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hijacking an existing article[edit]

Stop trying to replace the content of Private Case. Such edits may be considered vandalism and will result in you being blocked from editing. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 08:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:ANB[edit]

I have opened a discussion regarding your edits at: WP:ANB you are welcome to participate, and if you choose to it may be helpful. Thank you. --Wintonian (talk) 08:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Adessin"[edit]

A page you created, Adessin, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. MrStalker ^(talk) 08:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account for several reasons: (i) conflict of interests: your username coincides with the name of the company you are writing about. (ii) Promotion: your edits promote a company, without justifying its notability for inclusion to wikipedia. (iii) Disruptive editing: your were trying to overwrite the existing article Private Case with another article (or move existing article out of the way, instead of moving yours). I also believe that user:Adessin is linked to your account. This is categorized as sockpuppetry and therefore I have blocked user:Adessin as well. (iv) Copyright violation: you were copying text from this website which is not allowed on wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Privatecase (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to write article about our company private case. I maybe did it wrong because this is my first wiki article. How should I do it correct? There is also an existing article about Private Case, which I tried to move to more specific location (Private Case (Library Collection)). But Bot thought this as a negative action. So is there any possibility to get option-page where people can chose do they wan to go a company article site or to library collection site? With option-page I mean like the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPM UPM is also one Finnish company but UPM means also something else. I tried to write this "Private Case" page in the January 2010 but I was delayed and now someone wrote the article about different subject. If my company's article was deleted for copyright issues you can place the site back because I have written the page http://www.privatecase.fi/en/company (of course with translator but I have the copyrights). I also have the acces to edit that site if it is necessary. Please contact me soon about how should we proceed. - Valtteri

Decline reason:

It isn't possible to unblock this account, because it has the name of a company as its username. Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree to avoid writing about ourselves or our own companies. Since you don't appear to be interested in writing about any subjects other than your own company, you don't need an active Wikipedia account right now. Don't worry- if your company is truly notable, then it's inevitable that others outside the company will write about it. If you ever become interested in volunteering to help write the encyclopedia, not on behalf of your business, please feel free to create a personal account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:06, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed the on-hold notification. Once you file an unblock request, admins are made aware of it automatically. You should be aware that the circumstances around your block are discussed at the admin's noticeboard. Because of your block, you cannot reply there, but you may further discuss here on this page. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]