Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nicola Roberts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nicola Roberts[edit]

Caption goes here

I thought this was a good on stage shot, she's got a nice shape to her. Appears in Nicola Roberts and Girls Aloud. The author is "James" from rokfoto.net (PS please you can help me identify her bandmates at talk:Girls Aloud). Dunc| 01:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominate Dunc| 01:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • and support Dunc| 01:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • and concur Dunc| 01:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Would be better cropped, though that won't help with the iffy focus. It's also overexposed. —Cryptic (talk) 01:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, i don't like what ever is blocking her left leg. --ZeWrestler Talk 14:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • er, I think you mean right leg(?) Dunc| 17:57, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not very interesting or eye-catching. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-09-4 17:13
  • Nice pic, but not nice enough to be a FP. Sorry. Oppose. Titoxd 06:59, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Thelb4 07:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, overexposed and not stunning. - Mgm|(talk) 09:04, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support Nicely composed. Not many shots of people in FP. Kerowyn 10:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: eye-catching and well-structured. Good use of contrast. Jdhowens90 09:04, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral I quite like this photo but the out of focus face spoils it. --Fir0002 07:36, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Overexposed front of shirt; also, not particularly striking. Enochlau 09:38, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • ( − ) Oppose Nothing special, technical quality is low. — Sverdrup 20:50, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -Poor focus, not terribly striking or interesting.--Deglr6328 15:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Yukk. MPF 16:37, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Uninteresting.—encephalonέγκέφαλος  15:34:26, 2005-09-10 (UTC)
  • Oppose. I'd support if the face had been in focus. --Rebroad 17:21, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:12, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]