Commons:Deletion requests/3-views of aircraft by FSHL

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

3-views of aircraft by FSHL

All remaining 3-view aircraft images of FSHL need to be deleted along with the very similar ones that have already been deleted as a result of this deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29). I have provided detailed reasons for deletion in my closing remarks.

Some of the images in question can be seen at User:FSHL#Military aircrafts.

--MichaelMaggs 17:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

• According to your rationale. --Polarlys 16:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete / Fred J 21:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As per previous afd arguments. Megapixie 04:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Sad to see effort wasted but the effort spent on these could perhaps instead have been used more productively. There is no convincing argument put forth that these are not copyviolating conversions/tracings of copyrighted work, and the user, who seems more intent on making points than in working constructively, is not likely to put forth what has repeatedly been asked for, so Delete, with regret. ++Lar: t/c 13:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete According to extensive arguments here. ⇒Inductiveload┋τ ∫ϲ┋ 16:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment: Shouldn't this be for just about all his SVG's? Images like Image:Jian-8.svg are pretty obvious too, and after his arguments on the previous deletions I'm even having doubts about the originality of Image:Brain-Mapping.svg and Image:SSBS-Silo-Draft.svg. - Dammit 20:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • There are a lot of images to deal with. Perhaps keeping things grouped might make things more workable? You could certainly create additional requests for deletion as needed. ++Lar: t/c 21:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

This is IMHO not necessary. All in all we have to check 72 remaining files, why additional bureaucracy? The images on anatomy are obvious, Image:Brain-Mapping.svg must have been taken from an human anatomy textbook or any other copyrighted source. No “artist” can do this without any template, in this case the “artist“ who traced it had obviously no knowledge in anatomy at all, since the graphic contains a lot of artifacts of unknown origin and doesn’t represent any structure in an adequate way. For its categories (Brain | Central nervous system | Cerebrum | Medicine | Nervous system | Neuroanatomy | Neuroscience | Physiology | Skeletal system ), it’s useless pseudo content. I’d not know which article to illustrate with. --Polarlys 22:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Info: FSHL has uploaded a further 60 copyvios on 23rd Aug after my final warning on 22nd Aug here: User talk:FSHL#Commons:Deletion requests/Aircraft drawings (2007-07-29). I have blocked for two weeks. I think we have all had enough. --MichaelMaggs 22:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Did he not just change the license? But when will we close this request anyway? --Polarlys 22:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• He's changed the licenses from {{pd-ineligible}} to {{PD-self}}. Hardly an action consistent with the conclusions of all previous discussions, and I would consider it an act of defiance. I support the block. ⇒Inductiveload┋τ ∫ϲ┋ 00:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, you're right. But I'm inclined to leave the block in place in any case. As you say, the licence change seems to be an act of defiance. --MichaelMaggs 07:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC).
• I've unblocked and re-blocked with a corrected reason. --MichaelMaggs 07:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Delete all per above arguments. Anyone wanting to nominate FSHL's other uploads should feel free to do so. They all seem suspicious to me --MichaelMaggs 07:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)