Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sophia iznutri.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:Sophia_iznutri.jpg

Not a two-dimensional work of art, PD-art does not apply. Kjetil_r 12:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Question Do you suspect it is copyrighed?
  If this photo is original work of uploader - just change {{PD-art}} to {{PD-old}}. If you suspect copyright violation - tell why, I do not see any printing artefacts. Julo 14:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I consider this a copyright violation because it comes from artclassic.edu.ru, according to the description page. There is nothing that indicates that this is the uploader's work. --Kjetil_r 14:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

 Keep Did you not see the description that it is a really old cathedral in Kiev ? It is an art class trip to a cathedral in Russia. It is properly linked to two active Categories. It is the uploaders work like the other 2,000,000 photos on Commons, they had the camera. WayneRay 14:21, 1 June 2008 (UTC)WayneRay

Yes, I know that it is a 11th century cathedral. But how do you know that it is the uploader's own work? The discription does not say so, the contrary is actually claimed when the PD-art tag is used. --Kjetil_r 15:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The license tag is for some reason changed to PD-old [1]. I doubt that the photo was taken 70+ years ago. --Kjetil_r 20:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Delete There wasn't coloured film 70 years ago. {{PD-art}} cannot be used here, either because of 3D art. Vinhtantran 03:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

 Comment There were color films 70 years ago, I have some Agfa diapositives made by my grandpa in 1930's. See also Technicolor. Julo 06:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Delete, unless the uploader proves the PD status. artclassic.edu.ru says it is copyrighted by the Prosvescheniye publisher, and is hosted on Microsoft-IIS (which makes it more likely to be a very-non-free site). I couldn't find the image on the site. --AVRS 16:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

---

Deleted. No evidence that the copyright owner (the photographer) has released this under a free licence MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)