User:Doug Weller
|
|
IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
Administrative action review (0 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread) Most recent:
|
---|
Bots noticeboard (2 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (7 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Original research noticeboard (12 threads) |
---|
External links noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Conflict of interest noticeboard (16 threads) |
---|
Dispute resolution noticeboard (1 thread) Most recent:
|
---|
Media copyright questions (8 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (policy) (12 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (proposals) (5 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (7 threads) |
---|
|}
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- 12.18.211.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses used by Wikipedia users. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Stale warning. Last warning was issued 16 days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses used by Wikipedia users. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2606:9400:99a0:5ce0:4c48:8577:2c:13f (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1197 five times in the last 5 minutes (Excessive exclamation marks, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2a02:587:201f:ac00:16ce:cb26:1f27:baa6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 189 five times in the last 5 minutes (BLP vandalism or libel, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cloudmoon123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1307 (LTA 1307, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Ud817 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Clearly WP:NOTHERE. The user is only here to push a POV and delete sourced content. Skitash (talk) 18:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. User seems to have made some productive edits in the past; maybe they would benefit from a more involved discussion than what this noticeboard is designed to provide. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 151.44.0.0/16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) – Range is currently occupied by IP hopper who continually removes death info from articles about deceased celebrities. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
User-reported
- Zendrago X (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username, user has a YouTube channel with the same name. M S Hassan (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's a pen name, they haven't edited to promote their you tube channel. Secretlondon (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon They actually did once. M S Hassan (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's a pen name, they haven't edited to promote their you tube channel. Secretlondon (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- PT SUMBER ENERGY (Sylvi Febriya - Marketing) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 05:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. (and anyway not a username violation, as it clearly identifies an individual associated with the company). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- DJUKUNNATION (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Agent 007 (talk) 13:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 13:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Josh Gavin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Agent 007 (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I'd call this an edge case, in that it is the name of a person who probably was not very notable, and who has been dead for some time. It's also not a distinctive name at all, I'd imagine there's many persons by this name. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nick von kid toucher (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 00:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
User:Iwaqarhashmi
Indefinite template protection: Requesting indefinte template protection for my user page because it was vandalized before, so I copied all the contents of the user page onto a ".css" subpage, but an extended confirmed user added the wrong COI template recently. Thanks! Waqar💬 16:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Uh ... this is sort of a unique request. Anybody other regular reviewer here have a take on this? Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand this is a unique request, but I'm hoping you can help. I would be incredibly grateful if you could consider fully protecting my user page to prevent any further vandalism once and for all. Waqar💬 05:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Template-protection or full protection would make the userpage inaccessible for almost everyone, and also for the OP. I see the incident of adding a COI template as a one-time off which doesn't amount to enough disruption to warrant protection; I would not grant this request. Lectonar (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- While template protection can limit editing access, it doesn't necessarily render the user page inaccessible. Editors with appropriate permissions, like administrators or template editors, can still make edits if necessary. In the case of a COI template, a one-time incident can still be disruptive, especially if it affects the accuracy of the userpage. Waqar💬 07:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why I wrote ' for almost everyone. But imagine you want a change made, and if the page was protected like you requested (so you can't edit it it yourself), you would then need an admin or template editor to implement the changes you want to make. I just gave my 2 cents here, and will let another admin decide. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The content of my user page is still uneditable by most users, even without template protection, because it's been transcluding from a ".css" subpage on my user page, and whoever wants to make changes to my user page can leave a message on my talk page. That's a much better approach! Waqar💬 07:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Template-protection or full protection would make the userpage inaccessible for almost everyone, and also for the OP. I see the incident of adding a COI template as a one-time off which doesn't amount to enough disruption to warrant protection; I would not grant this request. Lectonar (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think it would be consistent with WP:UPROT to deny this request because the
genuine and realistic need
requirement has not been met. The level of disruption on the page is very low. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand this is a unique request, but I'm hoping you can help. I would be incredibly grateful if you could consider fully protecting my user page to prevent any further vandalism once and for all. Waqar💬 05:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. See WP:UPROT and above discussion. The page isn't close to being at the point where an unusual protection level makes sense. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Foreign relations of Malaysia
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP disruption. May spill out into China–Malaysia relations. CMD (talk) 07:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2401:3C00:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the four articles they've been disruptive on for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Toofan (2024 film)
Reason: It was protected one time because there was high level IP vandalism. After the protection period ended another ip vandalism started and I requested for page protection second time, but it wasn't protected. Now again a ip is trying to edit it with original research. I reverted it, but it is clear that they will not be stale because they tried the same thing with different ips before that. So please I request you not to deny its protection this time and request you to protect it for at least two months because it is gonna be released on Eid-ul-Adha which is near and during that time there will be high level editing and adding unsourced box-office like what happened to Priyotoma and Rajkumar (2024 film). Mehedi Abedin (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There has been that one outburst in four days since protection expired. If there is a need to protect it when it is released, we will deal with it then. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Houdini (Eminem song)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Launchballer 12:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I'd consider adding an inline comment and perhaps even a reference as per MOS:LEADCITE guidance on current subjects. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Wonderful Pretty Cure!
Want Semi protection for this article and sub article List of Wonderful Pretty Cure! episodes
Semi-Protection: a lot of people are changing stuff and reverting changes like leaking spoilers before it happens. Anime1990 (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Adobe Lightroom
Temporary semi-protection: Tag team SPAs add links to download site ... over and over ... can we have a break please? Or is there admin magic that could prevent that site (lrapkp.com) getting linked to ... ?? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I’m pretty sure the admins can blacklist sites from being linked to, at least with sourcing. Dunno about vandalism though. Blueskiesdry (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined We do indeed have a page for this, although it is not just something any admin can do. This is best handled through the spam blacklist. Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Gothic architecture
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removing text without any explanation. The Banner talk 18:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Added the article to the existing partial blocks on the ranges Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Into the Pandemonium
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs from Brazil removing citations and adding controversial BLP material. Binksternet (talk) 23:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Malinaccier (talk) 00:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Montana Tucker
Reason: This page has been protected in 2008, after several attempts at COI biographies. In other words, very much justified at that time. 16 years have passed and by now she passes the GNG. I wish to undo what is by now an injustice. gidonb (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Gidonb: Do you have a ready draft article you could use to help justify unprotecting it? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have something on my machine I plan to use once unprotected. It's not very organized. I will add plenty of references and tie to the many pages where she is currently mentioned.[1] It's a similar effort really to the Brian Balmages article that I recreated. Was also understandably removed for peacock, yet notable. gidonb (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Module:RFX report
Reason: Downgrade to semi-protection to match Template:RFX report, which is the only template that invokes this module. They are both transcluded on 389 other pages. (For a period of three months in 2022 the module was transcluded on >5000 pages because of this edit, later reverted, so the bot template-protected it.) If semi is too low, please increase Template:RFX report to match the module. SilverLocust 💬 06:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Module:Rfx
Reason: Downgrade to semi-protection from template-protection. Transcluded on 457 pages. It is invoked by Module:RFX report, so the bot template-protected it in 2022 for the same reason. SilverLocust 💬 06:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Calgary International Airport
Unprotection: I think it can have the PC removed at this point, I don't see persistent vandalism or disruptive editing in the past couple years of edits. the only IP vandalism has been minor and infrequent. it's certainly not at the level it was when the page was protected. I also see constructive edits by unregistered and unconfirmed editors. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Check the filter log. It hasn't stopped. It's just getting held up by the filters. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Bob Lazar
Reason: The sources used are either one-sided or of poor quality. Thus, there is no critical debate about the person Bob Lazar. The article itself reads more like a denunciation than information. Htrdrware (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Israel-Hamas War
I would like to request that... (the map be updated to show that Israel now controls the entire Gaza-Egypt border) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @LordOfWalruses this is not the place. Contentious topics should not be unprotected. 48JCLTALK 12:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @48JCL: Unregistered and non-extended-confirmed editors are allowed to request edits to ARBPIA pages here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The talk page Talk:Israel-Hamas War is protected, therefore edit requests by non-extended-confirmed users land here. That is acceptable, and this request made above is reasonable. The people who actually do participate on that talk page should be reviewing requests here that remain open and haven't been declined for days. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
0 protected edit requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
2 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
Template:Admin dashboard/rfarfp
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
)
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
Barnstars
|
- Members of the Fifteen Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedia administrators
- Wikipedians in Florida
- Wikipedians in Miami
- Wikipedians in the United Kingdom
- British Wikipedians
- Wikipedia checkusers
- Wikipedia oversighters
- Wikipedians who use Discord
- Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week
- WikiProject Archaeology participants
- Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team members
- Wikipedians by alma mater: Yale University
- Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests
- Wikipedians with MS degrees
- Wikipedians who have access to Project MUSE
- Members of the Ten Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedians by alma mater: London School of Economics