User talk:98Tigerius

Committed identity: c95a739811fb004d63ac532409a62fe88d1b488ecd2ee6761396a60b590c81b0ba0b96c5eb0b9d2232bd45c418630dc425d48ffdb8067d83b9aacf367706384e is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Please leave a message or query below by clicking here or the "Add topic" button above..

Archives: 1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Hi 98Tigerius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023)[edit]

Congratulations, 98Tigerius! The list you nominated, List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting your stand[edit]

Hi, 98Tigerius.

Thanks for supporting the move request for "FIVB Volleyball Women's Challenger Cup", "FIVB Volleyball Men's Challenger Cup", and related pages and then placing the discussion on these at the women's sports and volleyball WikiProjects.

But may I solicit your stand, too, on the similarly-reasoned move requests for main pages Asian Women's Volleyball Challenge Cup and Asian Men's Volleyball Challenge Cup?

Thanks. Bagoto (talk) 02:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting/canvassing is considered inappropriate to gain consensus per WP:CAN. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 03:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Sorry about that. Thanks, good to know. Bagoto (talk) 04:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Volleyball at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification[edit]

Hey, I was just wondering what the reason is that the rankings are "frozen" at september 25th 2023 Sdobbe (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because that's the ranking pre-VNL and per WP:NOTEVERYTHING: "..An article should not be a complete presentation of all possible details.." 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 14:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like there is a difference between "a complete presentation of all possible details" and not updating a table of ever-shifting rankings for a period of nearly 9 months.

I am however not too familiar with the way things are done on Wikipedia, so if you could point me to some more info on how things like this are covered that would be appreciated Sdobbe (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Music Bank[edit]

I tend to watch the Music Bank livestreams on YouTube so that I can update the article as quickly as possible. That is how I learn about the winning artist and their score. All that being said, I do NOT know how to access the reliable print resource that usually comes out. If you do reply back, please contact my talk page. Thank you. Zach Mando Games (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]