Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Tasks
Main | Talk | Assessment | Participants | Showcase | Tasks | Resources | Templates | Help | Portal |
WikiProject Animation |
---|
![]() |
Information |
Animation Portal • Changes |
This is the a list of tasks that either need regular attention for WikiProject Animation.
To do list[edit]
Cleanup listing[edit]
A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
This is the list of Unreferenced BLPs automatically generated by DASHBot.
There are no unreferenced BLPs tagged by Template:WikiProject Animation.
Requested articles[edit]
- Requested articles
- Experimental animation
- Films
- The King's Beard, Timothy Tweedle the First Christmas Elf, The Return of the Prodigal Parrot
- Television
- Cyboars, Louie (animated show), Simsalagrimm, Brainphreak
- People
- Andrew Kepple, Chasen Kay, Vince Collins, Corin Hardy, Kondoh Akino
- Studios
- Studio CGI
edit
New articles[edit]
- New articles by topic — New articles (Animation)
The following articles have been identified by InceptionBot as potentially being within the scope of the project, based on the Animation ruleset. It is likely that some of them are false positives; please examine the log if you have any questions.
This page lists recently created Animation-related articles. Remember to nominate the best new articles at Template talk:Did you know so Wikipedia can highlight them on the main page.
This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.
Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2024-06-12 19:26 (UTC)
Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.
- Colourblocks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Alalch E. (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2024-06-12, score: 90
- Draft:Red Caps (2026 TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 141.98.195.26 (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-06-12, score: 90
- Draft:Santa's Magic Crystal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 141.98.195.26 (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-06-12, score: 100
- Draft:The Nordic Christmas Hour (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 141.98.195.26 (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-06-12, score: 80
- Draft:Kimboo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Slgrandson (talk · contribs · new pages (8)) started on 2024-06-12, score: 110
- No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Escostick (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-11, score: 80
- 1883 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-11, score: 60
- Happy Baby (animation) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by LIYULUN (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-07, score: 100
- MeTV Toons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Msw1002 (talk · contribs · new pages (6)) started on 2024-06-04, score: 50
- Draft:Untitled Jack and the Beanstalk project (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 141.98.195.26 (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-06-11, score: 80
- Draft:Foster (2025 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 141.98.195.26 (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-06-11, score: 80
- Draft:Oh, the Places You'll Go! (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Fanaticaddict (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-10, score: 80
- Category:1883 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-11, score: 60
- Draft:D.I.Y. Duck (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by SlySabre (talk · contribs · new pages (4)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 60
- Template:Year animated television series debuts or endings category/core (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Jeabbabe (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-06-10, score: 100
- Category:Nickelodeon Animation Studio user templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Catfurball (talk · contribs · new pages (27)) started on 2024-06-10, score: 120
- Saving Bikini Bottom: The Sandy Cheeks Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Zingo156 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 90
- 1884 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 50
- Batman (franchise) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Marisoft69 (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 80
- Category:1884 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 60
- Category:2020s Chinese animated television series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Ajacraig2011 (talk · contribs · new pages (4)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 60
- Category:2010s Chinese animated television series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Ajacraig2011 (talk · contribs · new pages (4)) started on 2024-06-09, score: 60
- Draft:Krusty Towers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Arhan2212 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-08, score: 110
- Exploding Kittens (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Prince Silversaddle (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-07, score: 60
- Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by RetroGamer81 (talk · contribs · new pages (0)) started on 2024-06-07, score: 100
- Megamind Rules! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 115.189.91.173 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 150
- Draft:Plankton: The Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Flyless Kyle (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 80
- Draft:Motel Transylvania (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 80
- 1885 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 80
- Chhota Bheem and the Curse of Damyaan (2024 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 122.161.249.217 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-03, score: 70
- Draft:Flying Tigers Entertainment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 2001:14BB:C1:1479:B409:FD7B:9CF5:EB4C (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 100
- Draft:Adriel Meka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Amekapictures (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 50
- Draft:Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 142.127.36.176 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 60
- Draft:Prime Focus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 2001:14BB:67E:32CE:150C:2692:89BA:6CFF (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-05, score: 100
- Category:1885 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-06, score: 60
- Shadowland (song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Tbhotch (talk · contribs · new pages (36)) started on 2024-06-05, score: 50
- The Adventures of Lariat Sam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dwanyewest (talk · contribs · new pages (10)) started on 2024-06-04, score: 70
- Draft:Kazorn and the Unicorn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 84.253.221.31 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-05, score: 70
- Draft:Bix Pix Entertainment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by FigFan4Life (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-05, score: 90
- The Only Game in Town (1979 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Bearcat (talk · contribs · new pages (88)) started on 2024-06-04, score: 70
- 1886 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-04, score: 70
- Zokie of Planet Ruby (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by KfirAharon (talk · contribs · new pages (0)) started on 2024-05-28, score: 50
- Draft:Chhota Bheem and the Curse of Damyaan (2024 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by 122.161.249.217 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-03, score: 60
- Category:1886 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-06-04, score: 60
- Evil Morty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Cece GFI (talk · contribs · new pages (4)) started on 2024-06-03, score: 100
- Victoria Vincent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by NoonIcarus (talk · contribs · new pages (10)) started on 2024-05-31, score: 90
- Draft:The Impossible Stream (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Jediknight15 (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2024-06-03, score: 60
- Draft:張小踏 Step C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by SuuanL (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-02, score: 80
- My Hero Academia: You're Next (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by SamuelLovesFilms (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-06-01, score: 60
- Shigeyuki Miya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Twinkle1990 (talk · contribs · new pages (6)) started on 2024-05-31, score: 50
- Yoshinobu Yamakawa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Miminity (talk · contribs · new pages (16)) started on 2024-05-31, score: 80
- J.J. Villard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 98.195.26.147 (talk · contribs · new pages (0)) started on 2024-05-31, score: 80
- Draft:Evil Morty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by BD2412 (talk · contribs · new pages (667)) started on 2024-05-31, score: 80
- Draft:Batman Ninja vs. Yakuza League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by KingArti (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2024-05-31, score: 70
- Draft:Goat (2026 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by MinionsFan1998 (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2024-05-30, score: 70
- Bujji and Bhairava (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Jayanthkumar123 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-05-30, score: 80
- 1887 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-05-30, score: 70
- Why (Gen Hoshino song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by IanTEB (talk · contribs · new pages (9)) started on 2024-05-24, score: 50
- Draft:Untitled Minecraft series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by SuperWikiBrother (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2024-05-30, score: 90
- Draft:Minecraft (animated series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by MKsLifeInANutshell (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2024-05-30, score: 80
- Category:1887 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-05-30, score: 60
- 1888 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-05-29, score: 100
- Category:1888 in animation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) by Dimadick (talk · contribs · new pages (71)) started on 2024-05-29, score: 60
- Chip Chilla (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by 2600:1002:B0C2:6E7D:0:1E:38A8:C01 (talk · contribs · new pages (0)) started on 2024-05-20, score: 50
Article alerts[edit]
Articles for deletion
- 11 Jun 2024 – Dajjal: The Slayer and His Followers (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Captain Assassin! (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 10 Jun 2024 – Cleveland Brown Jr. (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Samoht27 (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 10 Jun 2024 – Inspector Chingum (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by M S Hassan (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 10 Jun 2024 – S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mdann52 (t · c); see discussion (8 participants)
- 10 Jun 2024 – Archi & Meidy (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by GamerPro64 (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 07 Jun 2024 – Roger Blonder (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by HaeB (t · c); see discussion (6 participants)
- 07 Jun 2024 – Golmaal Jr. (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by M S Hassan (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 07 Jun 2024 – King Grayskull (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Boneless Pizza! (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- 07 Jun 2024 – Battle Cat (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Boneless Pizza! (t · c); see discussion (0 participants)
- 07 Jun 2024 – Demona (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Boneless Pizza! (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- (15 more...)
Templates for discussion
- 30 May 2024 – Template:Machinima episode (talk · edit · hist) TfDed by Jonesey95 (t · c) was closed; see discussion
Redirects for discussion
- 12 Jun 2024 – Doug Lawrence (talk · edit · hist) →Mr. Lawrence was RfDed by Steel1943 (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Jun 2024 – Terrible Secret of Space (talk · edit · hist) →All your base are belong to us was RfDed by Dylnuge (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Jun 2024 – Nicktoons (TV channel) (talk · edit · hist) →Nicktoons (American TV channel) was RfDed by Intrisit (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Jun 2024 – Nicktoons (TV network) (talk · edit · hist) →Nicktoons (American TV channel) was RfDed by Intrisit (t · c); see discussion
Files for discussion
- 12 Jun 2024 – File:HavocinHeaven1964.jpg (talk · edit · hist) (on Havoc in Heaven) was FfDed by Fumikas Sagisavas (t · c); see discussion
Good article nominees
- 05 Jun 2024 – The Legend of Boo-Kini Bottom (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Zingo156 (t · c); start discussion
- 30 May 2024 – Mushu (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Changedforbetter (t · c); start discussion
- 14 Apr 2024 – Kristoff (Frozen) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Fieryninja (t · c); start discussion
- 14 Apr 2024 – Morph (X-Men: The Animated Series) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by PanagiotisZois (t · c); start discussion
- 22 Mar 2024 – Twilight Sparkle (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Pamzeis (t · c); see discussion
Requested moves
- 21 May 2024 – Animonsta Studios (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Monsta by SafariScribe (t · c); see discussion
- 17 May 2024 – Transformers (film) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Transformers (2007 film) by 71.95.108.35 (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 25 May 2024 – Checkered Past (TV programming block) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Adult Swim by MikeM2011 (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Stinkor (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Kobra Khan (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – King Hiss (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Evil-Lyn (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Hordak (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Teela (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Sorceress of Castle Grayskull (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Roboto (character) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- 07 May 2024 – Ram-Man (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters by 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F01B:2293:64B4:C2BD (t · c); see discussion
- (8 more...)
Articles to be split
- 03 Jun 2024 – Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 162 etc. (t · c); see discussion
- 29 May 2024 – Postcards from Buster (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by (Oinkers42) (t · c); see discussion
- 04 May 2024 – List of Curious George episodes (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 2601:1C1:8200:260:98D0:2177:BB63:E46A (t · c); see discussion
- 14 Apr 2024 – PAW Patrol (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Rtkat3 (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Feb 2024 – Dynomutt, Dog Wonder (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 2804:5C:4DB1:9100:5C4B:9A06:4BCC:E278 (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Dec 2023 – Gullah Gullah Island (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 2601:601:511:212E:417A:2AF7:1713:C7C7 (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Sep 2023 – Tooning Out the News (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 114.10.9.245 (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Sep 2023 – Danger Mouse (1981 TV series) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 191.125.27.25 (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Aug 2023 – My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by JSH-alive (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Aug 2023 – Mike the Knight (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 2603:7000:B800:22EA:ED32:F5A4:DEB7:306C (t · c); see discussion
- (7 more...)
Articles for creation
- 06 Jun 2024 – Draft:Rugrats Storyboard Jam (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by ImageBoi (t · c)
- 05 Jun 2024 – Draft:Jing Ju Cats (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Grodzisko (t · c)
- 02 Jun 2024 – Draft:Tru Valentino (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by TechnoSquirrel69 (t · c)
- 01 Jun 2024 – Draft:National Animation Museum (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Albero24 (t · c)
- 20 May 2024 – Draft:Lucy Heavens (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Brooklyn315 (t · c)
- 14 May 2024 – Draft:NacelleVerse (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Fico Puricelli (t · c)
- 12 May 2024 – Draft:Fabulous Beasts (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Villkomoses (t · c)
- 03 May 2024 – Draft:Daiki Tomiyasu (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by 2600:1700:E60:C0E0:48B9:FC2E:3134:B91 (t · c)
- 03 May 2024 – Draft:The Inseparables (2023 film) (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by 2600:1002:B03E:BCD4:0:20:3175:7101 (t · c)
- 01 May 2024 – Draft:IACG Multimedia College (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Knowmore.ch24 (t · c)
- (6 more...)
Click to watch (Subscribe via
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/43/Feed-icon.svg/14px-Feed-icon.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/43/Feed-icon.svg/14px-Feed-icon.svg.png)
Deletion discussions[edit]
- To edit this section, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation
Vir: The Robot Boy[edit]
- Vir: The Robot Boy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. Owen× ☎ 13:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Arjun – Prince of Bali[edit]
- Arjun – Prince of Bali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, fails all notability guidelines. While the before search turned up nothing useful, the existing four sources in the article are not reliable. The first source in the article which does not appear reliable is just two short paragraphs and it is about a game developed to popularise the the series. The other three sources are from a single publisher with lengthy quotes from the producers themselves without an independent review. Piscili (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. Owen× ☎ 13:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Dajjal: The Slayer and His Followers[edit]
- Dajjal: The Slayer and His Followers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is clearly WP:HOAX and WP:NOTPROMO. The film never released because it never existed. The trailers were made by some 3rd-class animator(s). The film's director/writer Rana Abrar, is basically a journalist who tried to promote himself through this medium. The film only has directories and databases; there is not a single quality source to prove it. There is no crew, no cast, and not a single reliable source on the film anywhere. It has already been nominated once but the discussion was closed because of a lack of consensus. I think it should be looked at closely this time. Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 22:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Comics and animation, and Pakistan. Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 22:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find any reliable evidence that the film was released, which is impressive considering the number of sources here. I notice the previous AfD only received responses from the creator of the article and a single-purpose account. hinnk (talk) 23:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Disturbing if this article is a HOAX and that it managed to survive even an AfD nomination and this leads me to compare AfDs to a LOTTERY because even hoax articles can slip through, let alone topics that are particularly questionable or non-notable. Saqib (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Cleveland Brown Jr.[edit]
- Cleveland Brown Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet general notability guidelines. The little significant coverage mentioning this character is not about the character itself, rather focusing on the show at large. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Television, and Comics and animation. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of characters in the Family Guy franchise#Cleveland_Brown_Jr. - The sources currently in the article are extremely weak, either being primary, or a couple sentences from an interview. Searches did not turn up much better - the character is mentioned in general coverage of the show(s) he appeared in, but nothing close to any kind of significant coverage that would justify a independent article. A general overview of both the fictional and real world history of the character is already included in the main franchise character list, so this should be Redirected there. Rorshacma (talk) 23:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per Rorshacma. This doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV, but there is a valid WP:ATD and redirect target here. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Inspector Chingum[edit]
- Inspector Chingum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Added a few things. If judged insufficient, redirect to Motu Patlu#Recurring. Again, I am inviting the nominator to PLEASE slow down nominations of Indian animated series or to directly and boldly redirect them to obvious related articles if they think apparent notability issues need to be addressed urgently. THANK YOU. Taking a page to Afd with a minimal rationale may take some time but checking sources, improving the page, verifying potential targets, etc, also does. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer not to boldly redirect articles to other articles because I believe in the significance of discussion and reaching consensus. M S Hassan (talk) 04:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough! Thank you for your comment. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I prefer not to boldly redirect articles to other articles because I believe in the significance of discussion and reaching consensus. M S Hassan (talk) 04:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters[edit]
- S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Work itself does not appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:N. Sourcing, aside from primary sources such as tweets and youtube discussions, are mainly interviews and discuss the author far more than the work itself. Artist is possibly notable, however this doesn't seem to quite meet the notability bar. Mdann52 (talk) 09:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Mdann52 (talk) 09:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Television, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Swampy Marsh: for now? -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The sourcing for this page is strong enough to keep, so for now I'm going to say weak keep. But, if it comes down to it, I'd be fine turning it into a redirect to Swampy Marsh, but... deleting this page outright would be a disservice to those who worked on the page, so a redirect would be my second choice. Historyday01 (talk) 13:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think a redirect or draftify (in case anything further comes of this) is also a good outcome here, unfortunately I was struggling to find another article to redirect this to. It may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, and further sourcing will emerge later on if work/release dates re-emerge. Mdann52 (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can agree, that's why I stand by saying weak keep and redirect at the present time. I personally do NOT trust the draft process entirely (its too easy for a good article to be held up there, and the draft process is really for Wikipedia beginners to be perfectly honest) and would much rather it become a redirect rather than a draft, if that is the choice. Historyday01 (talk) 16:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Historyday01 you appear to be the primary author and maintainer of this article. In fact, perusing the history I don't see that anyone BUT you has contributed substantially to the article--everyone else appears to be cleaning/polishing your work. You don't mention this, nor that one of your added sources was previously removed as promotional. Rather, you refer to yourself obliquely in the third person
those who worked on the page
which also smacks of attempts to conceal your relationship to this article. To put it bluntly, your work on this article may well be that of an overenthusiastic hobbyist, but it also looks distinctly like COI or UPE. Can you confirm that you have no specific relationship, financial or otherwise, with the project or its contributors? Jclemens (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)- Thanks for your comment, you are correct that I am "the primary author and maintainer of this article", and surely I'm the main contributor, I won't deny. If one of my added sources was removed for being promotional, that's my error for not knowing it was promotional. I'm not referring to myself in the third person here, but I was trying to be inclusive of ALL the people who have contributed to this, including myself.
- I'm no "overenthusiastic hobbyist" or anything like that, I just felt this subject should have an article. In response to your question ("Can you confirm that you have no specific relationship, financial or otherwise, with the project or its contributors?"), no, I do NOT have any special relationship with the project, not at all. In fact, I have tried to keep up with what is going on with the project but there haven't been many updates. This is why I personally support a weak keep or redirect (second option).
- I have attempted to improve the page over the years... It happens sometimes that a single person works on the page. I would LOVE if more people worked on the page, but sadly that has not happened. I made the page years ago when I had more time, but nowadays I don't have as much time to do Wikipedia edits. I could have surely done better with the page, but I suppose this AfD was inevitable to some degree, I just would like the text to be preserved in the event that this series DOES premiere, it can be brought back at that point. Historyday01 (talk) 16:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Historyday01 My point about draftifying was to save the article to an extent - I would expect it to be redirected and draftified (or at the very least, I would add a redirect in should it be deleted given we have a valid target identified). This isn't me trying to downplay the effort or work that has gone into it - unfortunately often AfD is the best way to gain a consensus for such things. I agree that the draft/AfC process is broken to an extent, but you don't have to use that process. Mdann52 (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sadly, I have to agree. I've seen some AfDs go off the rails before and be totally worthless, including some calling for an article to be deleted and then doing nothing to help improve the article after the AfD ended, which is a bit depressing. The opinions of SOME people in this discussion (not you) is damaging my confidence to create future articles, as their comments are a bit harsh and pointed. Honestly, this article definitely needed to be examined again, so in that sense, this AfD is worthwhile, although I can't, in good conscience, support deletion of an article which I've been a been a big contributor in, because that would make me too sad.Historyday01 (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Historyday01 My point about draftifying was to save the article to an extent - I would expect it to be redirected and draftified (or at the very least, I would add a redirect in should it be deleted given we have a valid target identified). This isn't me trying to downplay the effort or work that has gone into it - unfortunately often AfD is the best way to gain a consensus for such things. I agree that the draft/AfC process is broken to an extent, but you don't have to use that process. Mdann52 (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think a redirect or draftify (in case anything further comes of this) is also a good outcome here, unfortunately I was struggling to find another article to redirect this to. It may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, and further sourcing will emerge later on if work/release dates re-emerge. Mdann52 (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as promotional and NN. This Wikipedia article is serving as promotion for a "project" that started "development" in 2018. It's not there, it's not going to be there, and the refbombing with press releases, interviews in NN niche publications, and tweets reeks of G11. I note nothing since 2022 in the article. Jclemens (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Its not a promotion for the project and the fact you would say that (and wrongly accuse me of having some sort of connection to those who created this series) is deeply unfortunate, especially coming from someone who boasts about saving articles on your user page. I guess this article doesn't matter to you. Simply put, if you really wanted to improve it, then why haven't you done any edits on it? I mean, you could have done something to improve it since it was created. I detest nothing more than editors who don't put in the work to improve articles (it seems you have in other articles, but unless I missed something, I don't see any edits from you on this article). As I've said in many AfD discussions, deletion is not a solution for cleanup of articles. I'm guessing NN means "non-notable" which I have to dispute. As I said above, I support a "weak keep" or "redirect" at this present time, and I will NOT be changing that view. If it really comes down to it, I would support this becoming either a redirect and/or a sentence or two about it at Jeff "Swampy" Marsh#Career after Phineas and Ferb and reviving the show (there's two good sources which show his involvement). If so, the mention of the series on Swampy Marsh's page could be:
"In 2019, Marsh was described as the executive producer and voice director of S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters, with his company, Surfer Jack Productions, producing the series.[1][2] The series is created by a queer woman named Samantha "Sam" Sawyer, based on her unpublished comic of the same name.[3][4]
- It could be of interest to those who follow Marsh to mention this. If this text was added, then the article could be changed to a redirect, and then that redirect link could be changed to Jeff "Swampy" Marsh#Career after Phineas and Ferb and reviving the show. I've seen some other articles which have done this, so it wouldn't be completely out of the question. I had been roughly planning to add the series to the List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present for a while, but ended up removing it, and mentioning it here. Anyway, your comment could be worded in a much less harsh way. If I was a new editor and I had gotten a comment like that, I would be discouraged from creating ANY new articles. Luckily, I'm not one of those people, but the tone of your comment needs to be MUCH better and more constructive, than trying to (as it looks to me) tear people down.Historyday01 (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for asserting that you have no financial or other interest in keeping this article or promoting this potential series. I accept your statement, but note that the binary alternative, that you are an overenthusiastic hobbyist, isn't a bad thing in comparison. We're all allowed to have the things that we see more value in than other people do.
- As such, no one is asking you to change your !vote. That'd be a bit totalitarian at best: You're entitled to want something saved that isn't ready for Wikipedia, as I maintain that this is not.
- Having said that, I'd encourage you to not take this too personally. I know that's hard to do when someone is calling your "baby" ugly... but sometimes a baby is just ugly. In this case, you appear to have put together the best article reasonably possible on this not-media, but it's just not sufficient. Really, you have interviews and coverage of the people involved, but nothing that states this would come close to meeting WP:NFF or similar guideline. Go read up on that, and understand that if we had articles on every single project that's been stuck in development hell, we'd be awash in them. There's nothing to draftify, because there is no evidence it is going anywhere in the foreseeable future. I'm sorry, but that's reality as best I can see it. Jclemens (talk) 19:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't consider myself some "overenthusiastic hobbyist" as that term seems to be a negative, and its not one I accept, not in the slightest. It's like saying I'm a "history buff". I'm not, and I hate that term, as much as I detest the word "hobbyist." It has a bad connotation and its not one I would ever associate with. I'm not some person who plays around with drones or builds model trains in my basement, I'm someone who cares about certain subjects on here (and in real-life), and that's okay! I continue to disagree with you on this, while I appreciate that you are saying that I "appear to have put together the best article reasonably possible on this not-media" and to not even support a redirect just doesn't sit well with me. As a fair warning, if this series does get up and running again (which is altogether possible), I'm not going to be gung ho to make it a page if this is deleted. I'm going to say it isn't worth my time, believing that "oh, someone will just nominate this for an AfD again, so what's the point." I just don't want it to come to that. I still believe this article has value, and I will continue to believe that, regardless of your arguments to the contrary. I recently posted about this on the four projects on the present article's talk page, hoping to get some more eyes on this discussion.Historyday01 (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're arguing against characterizing yourself as an overenthusiastic hobbyist, but participating extensively here and stating if things don't go your way you're going to reconsider your editing. Whatever you choose to call that, that behavior precisely what I mean when I say "overenthusiastic hobbyist". Regardless, you're not convincing most participants here. I'd suggest proactively look at WP:THREE and follow that advice. Despite your perception of me, I would like nothing better than to be convinced I was wrong... but having looked through several of the sources, I'm not going to look at arbitrarily more marginal sources. So, build the case for notability and win me over. Jclemens (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's not about things going "my way," I'm just saying that what will, probably, happen if a certain result is reached. I have no influence over whether people are convinced to keep the article or not. Their decision is their business and it seems too time consuming to try and convince people here to change their minds. People already have their minds made up and there's nothing I can do about that. At this point, all I hope is that the page becomes a redirect. If it doesn't, then oh well. Historyday01 (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're arguing against characterizing yourself as an overenthusiastic hobbyist, but participating extensively here and stating if things don't go your way you're going to reconsider your editing. Whatever you choose to call that, that behavior precisely what I mean when I say "overenthusiastic hobbyist". Regardless, you're not convincing most participants here. I'd suggest proactively look at WP:THREE and follow that advice. Despite your perception of me, I would like nothing better than to be convinced I was wrong... but having looked through several of the sources, I'm not going to look at arbitrarily more marginal sources. So, build the case for notability and win me over. Jclemens (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't consider myself some "overenthusiastic hobbyist" as that term seems to be a negative, and its not one I accept, not in the slightest. It's like saying I'm a "history buff". I'm not, and I hate that term, as much as I detest the word "hobbyist." It has a bad connotation and its not one I would ever associate with. I'm not some person who plays around with drones or builds model trains in my basement, I'm someone who cares about certain subjects on here (and in real-life), and that's okay! I continue to disagree with you on this, while I appreciate that you are saying that I "appear to have put together the best article reasonably possible on this not-media" and to not even support a redirect just doesn't sit well with me. As a fair warning, if this series does get up and running again (which is altogether possible), I'm not going to be gung ho to make it a page if this is deleted. I'm going to say it isn't worth my time, believing that "oh, someone will just nominate this for an AfD again, so what's the point." I just don't want it to come to that. I still believe this article has value, and I will continue to believe that, regardless of your arguments to the contrary. I recently posted about this on the four projects on the present article's talk page, hoping to get some more eyes on this discussion.Historyday01 (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- It could be of interest to those who follow Marsh to mention this. If this text was added, then the article could be changed to a redirect, and then that redirect link could be changed to Jeff "Swampy" Marsh#Career after Phineas and Ferb and reviving the show. I've seen some other articles which have done this, so it wouldn't be completely out of the question. I had been roughly planning to add the series to the List of animated series with LGBT characters: 2020–present for a while, but ended up removing it, and mentioning it here. Anyway, your comment could be worded in a much less harsh way. If I was a new editor and I had gotten a comment like that, I would be discouraged from creating ANY new articles. Luckily, I'm not one of those people, but the tone of your comment needs to be MUCH better and more constructive, than trying to (as it looks to me) tear people down.Historyday01 (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Sawyer, Sam (February 15, 2020). "SALEM Animated Series Creator Sam Sawyer, Cryptids, Nonbinary & Witchcraft". Piper's Picks TV (Online). Interviewed by Piper Reese. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved December 12, 2020. YouTube video of interview here
- ^ "Exclusive S.A.L.E.M sneak peek". Inconceivable Events. November 13, 2020. Archived from the original on 19 September 2021. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
- ^ Johnson, Bill (February 4, 2020). "Artist Sam Sawyer to LVL UP Expo". Las Vegas, NV Patch. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
- ^ Sawyer, Sam (December 18, 2019). "Artist Sam Sawyer Creates First Animated Series with Non-Binary Hero". Starshine Magazine (Online). Interviewed by Sandy Lo. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
- Delete: Does appear PROMO. Article is solely sourced to tweets, podcasts and non-RS. I don't find anything about this "upcoming" webseries that's been coming since 2018. If nothing has been written about it by now, I'm sure what notability we have left to find. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- As I said elsewhere in this discussion, this article is not promotional and it is incorrect to say it is so. The fact it is not as well sourced as it could have been is my fault. I wish someone (literally anyone) had brought these issues to my attention a year or so ago, as I would have done something about it, as the article's main contributor, rather than getting these comments in an AfD, which is the worst nightmare for an article creator. The fact that this AfD is happening at all is a failure of the Wikipedia system, as it could have been avoided with a discussion on the article's talk page. I would have been happy to discuss it there, but having an article in an AfD is very nerve-wracking and stressful. The article shouldn't be deleted outright, but should be changed, at minimum, to a redirect, or possibly, a weak keep. It is unfortunate that you support a deletion rather than a redirect, and I would hope that you change your view on that. Some series have BAD promotion, so that should be kept in mind. Otherwise, your comment is very harsh and should be much better worded, as the tone is VERY negative. If I was a new editor and I got this, I would not want to make any new articles ever again. --Historyday01 (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotional can be as simple as being listed higher up in search results; having an article here does help with Search engine optimization. This is not meant to be "mean" as I've discussed the facts here and please do not take it as such. You are certainly entitled to your !vote above, but I've reviewed what we have and don't feel either a redirect or a week keep would help in this case. If you are the article creator, please understand that you do not "own" the article, it's part of the wiki community and we all have a part to play in building a better encyclopedia. Oaktree b (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your argument that this is promotional is not convincing in the slightest. I understand that I don't "own" the article, but saying it should be deleted is wrong. I just can't agree with that. I maintain that if it comes to it, a redirect would be the best. To wipe this article off Wikipedia together would be not only be unfortunate, but indicate Wikipedia's bias against LGBTQ+ articles, which leeches into discussions such as this one.Historyday01 (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deletion isn't right or wrong; if it has not reliable sources, it's not suitable for here. We have rules in place and this will fall apart if we don't follow them, "just because" isn't a valid reason for keeping this. Oaktree b (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- We are going in circles here. I understand your sentiment that deletion isn't right or wrong but that "if it has not reliable sources, it's not suitable for here" and that there are rules. However, bias always plays into discussions such as this, whether people have that bias willingly or unwillingly. In any case, and at this point in the discussion, I maintain that this article has ENOUGH value to qualify for a redirect. If the series DOES release this year, which I see as not outside the realm of possibility (anything is possible), and reliable sources attest to that release, THEN it can come back into the article mainspace. The idea it has NO value and should be wiped away and thrown in the trash bin is wholly incorrect, as you and the others foolishly favoring deletion (rather than any alternatives), are trying to claim.Historyday01 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deletion isn't right or wrong; if it has not reliable sources, it's not suitable for here. We have rules in place and this will fall apart if we don't follow them, "just because" isn't a valid reason for keeping this. Oaktree b (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your argument that this is promotional is not convincing in the slightest. I understand that I don't "own" the article, but saying it should be deleted is wrong. I just can't agree with that. I maintain that if it comes to it, a redirect would be the best. To wipe this article off Wikipedia together would be not only be unfortunate, but indicate Wikipedia's bias against LGBTQ+ articles, which leeches into discussions such as this one.Historyday01 (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promotional can be as simple as being listed higher up in search results; having an article here does help with Search engine optimization. This is not meant to be "mean" as I've discussed the facts here and please do not take it as such. You are certainly entitled to your !vote above, but I've reviewed what we have and don't feel either a redirect or a week keep would help in this case. If you are the article creator, please understand that you do not "own" the article, it's part of the wiki community and we all have a part to play in building a better encyclopedia. Oaktree b (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- As I said elsewhere in this discussion, this article is not promotional and it is incorrect to say it is so. The fact it is not as well sourced as it could have been is my fault. I wish someone (literally anyone) had brought these issues to my attention a year or so ago, as I would have done something about it, as the article's main contributor, rather than getting these comments in an AfD, which is the worst nightmare for an article creator. The fact that this AfD is happening at all is a failure of the Wikipedia system, as it could have been avoided with a discussion on the article's talk page. I would have been happy to discuss it there, but having an article in an AfD is very nerve-wracking and stressful. The article shouldn't be deleted outright, but should be changed, at minimum, to a redirect, or possibly, a weak keep. It is unfortunate that you support a deletion rather than a redirect, and I would hope that you change your view on that. Some series have BAD promotion, so that should be kept in mind. Otherwise, your comment is very harsh and should be much better worded, as the tone is VERY negative. If I was a new editor and I got this, I would not want to make any new articles ever again. --Historyday01 (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: All sourcing fails WP:SIRS, so article fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to disagree. Wouldn't a redirect to Jeff "Swampy" Marsh's page (the specific section is mentioned above) be a good compromise here? If it DOES pick up again and there ARE more sources, it can be brought back, but I think there's enough to justify the two sentences (which I purposed above) to at least mention it there. I did find some other sources about it in The Advocate, V13, Reel Librarians (cited as an external link on Librarians in popular culture and on some other pages on here), and The Corsair as well. Historyday01 (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- The Advocate (definitely an RS) is paywalled--not a disqualifier, but can you summarize that? V13 is another interview from 2020, and Reel Librarians is a bare mention from 2021. Nothing I've seen says this is anything other than an aspirational project stuck in development hell. Jclemens (talk) 03:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, the fact that the Advocate wasn't added before is that it was paywalled. I think its just an interview with Sawyer. I'm still supporting of a redirect rather than a straight deletion, which would wipe everything about this article from existence. Historyday01 (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:PAYWALL applies: it's still a good source, even if not free, although interviews only contribute to notability as much as the value of the underlying publication venue, and The Advocate would be the highest profile source I've seen discussed here. (note that some deprecate interviews even further than I do). You know you can keep a copy of this in your userspace pending eventual improvement, right? If you put it in draft, it gets deleted G13 in 6 months (IIRC), but userspace is not purged like that. As long as you don't run afoul of WP:FAKEARTICLE NN topics with potential SHOULD be able to live in your own sandboxes indefinitely. Jclemens (talk) 22:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- You are right that I could do that, but personally I think a redirect would be preferable as I already have many drafts / articles in progress. Historyday01 (talk) 01:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:PAYWALL applies: it's still a good source, even if not free, although interviews only contribute to notability as much as the value of the underlying publication venue, and The Advocate would be the highest profile source I've seen discussed here. (note that some deprecate interviews even further than I do). You know you can keep a copy of this in your userspace pending eventual improvement, right? If you put it in draft, it gets deleted G13 in 6 months (IIRC), but userspace is not purged like that. As long as you don't run afoul of WP:FAKEARTICLE NN topics with potential SHOULD be able to live in your own sandboxes indefinitely. Jclemens (talk) 22:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, the fact that the Advocate wasn't added before is that it was paywalled. I think its just an interview with Sawyer. I'm still supporting of a redirect rather than a straight deletion, which would wipe everything about this article from existence. Historyday01 (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- The Advocate (definitely an RS) is paywalled--not a disqualifier, but can you summarize that? V13 is another interview from 2020, and Reel Librarians is a bare mention from 2021. Nothing I've seen says this is anything other than an aspirational project stuck in development hell. Jclemens (talk) 03:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to disagree. Wouldn't a redirect to Jeff "Swampy" Marsh's page (the specific section is mentioned above) be a good compromise here? If it DOES pick up again and there ARE more sources, it can be brought back, but I think there's enough to justify the two sentences (which I purposed above) to at least mention it there. I did find some other sources about it in The Advocate, V13, Reel Librarians (cited as an external link on Librarians in popular culture and on some other pages on here), and The Corsair as well. Historyday01 (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Jeff "Swampy" Marsh as an alternate to deletion since there’s a reasonable chance that if it releases the content may be revived, but for now it just might be WP:TOOSOON. Raladic (talk) 02:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's my thought as well. As the main contributor to this, I'd be totally fine with a redirect... I think sometimes people forget that redirect is a good alternative to deletion. Some people in this discussion are even denying that, which seems strange to me. They just want to wipe out this article entirely. Historyday01 (talk) 20:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not even sure a redirect is appropriate; this project has been around since 2019, if it's not become notable by now, redirecting to this person's article doesn't bring anything of value. Oaktree b (talk) 01:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree. It does bring something of value. For those who are interested in Marsh, who is a BIG name in the animation industry, it only makes sense. Your continued harping that this article doesn't bring anything of value to Wikipedia is sounding like a broken record. It is not productive to ending this discussion.Historyday01 (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify? People have pointed out that the show's not really notable right now, but it could be in the future. But I don't think voting keep because it might be notable in the future is a good reason (WP:CRYSTALBALL, maybe). So my vote is towards draftifying. Not sure about redirecting to the director - the main person of the series is Sam Sawyer, but any ATD works. Spinixster (trout me!) 07:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm. Wouldn't a redirect be a bit better than a draft at this point? I only support redirecting to Marsh because he's a pretty big figure when it comes to the animation industry, and Sawyer doesn't have a page as of yet. Historyday01 (talk) 20:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- The target isn't mentioned at Marsh, though, so it might cause confusion for people who are trying to find it. Spinixster (trout me!) 15:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it will be confusing if we added in one or two sentences about it, using the formulation I mentioned above. If it comes to it, I would be fine with a draft, its just at this point in the discussion and since no one else seems to support "weak keep", a redirect is the first option I favor, and a draft is the second option I favor.Historyday01 (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- The target isn't mentioned at Marsh, though, so it might cause confusion for people who are trying to find it. Spinixster (trout me!) 15:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't draft, it's been around since 2018/2019, if it hasn't become notable in the 5 years since, I wouldn't count on a sudden influx of critical notice making it notable. Oaktree b (talk) 01:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't agree with that view. While I personally would lean more toward a redirect, a draft for me, wouldn't be completely out of the question. Historyday01 (talk) 01:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm. Wouldn't a redirect be a bit better than a draft at this point? I only support redirecting to Marsh because he's a pretty big figure when it comes to the animation industry, and Sawyer doesn't have a page as of yet. Historyday01 (talk) 20:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Archi & Meidy[edit]
- Archi & Meidy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Did not find any sources behind this series to establish notability. GamerPro64 02:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Indonesia. GamerPro64 02:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect to Yohanes Surya. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Golmaal Jr.[edit]
- Golmaal Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Golmaal Jr has enough sources for it to be an article, the series seems popular in general. TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Nickelodeon_Sonic#Animated_series: not opposed to keep; opposed to deletion, given the existing coverage. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect to Golmaal_(film_series)#Animated_series. 4 sources. One is broken link by sonicgang.com, other is news18, an interview with the maker of the animation series and final two are not on the WP:ICTFSOURCES list. It is also hard to find any secondary independent reliable sources and reviews on this animated series. RangersRus (talk) 14:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
King Grayskull[edit]
- King Grayskull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, and Comics and animation. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect this page to King Grayskull's section in List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. A quick online search doesn't show this character is notable. Moreover, from my understanding, he's a pretty minor character in the franchise to begin with. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 12:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as WP:ATD. Would support deletion due to insufficient sourcing. But there is a clear redirect target that might gain consensus. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Battle Cat[edit]
- Battle Cat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, and Comics and animation. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Rockoons[edit]
- Rockoons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG; all coverage both in article and in BEFORE search provides only WP:TRIVIALMENTION. WP:TVSERIES does not apply in the absence of reliable sourcing about its production. As an alternative to deletion, I propose to redirect to Soyuzmultfilm. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and Russia. Owen× ☎ 22:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep: I don't see how this fails notability. There are sources in the article. I must also add that the addition of the deletion tag seems premature as it was added only 9 minutes after the addition of those calling for the improvement of the article. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I added them as part of new page review, which was when I did source analysis and decided they did not meet WP:GNG. Did you look at the (two) sources? They each have a single passing mention of the show, nothing close to WP:SIGCOV. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're saying that the sources should only write about the show? At least they say something like the show is one of the selected ones in the country aimed for more international exposure. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 06:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I beg of you to read the WP:SIGCOV page. It's very clear about the kind of coverage required. Brief passing mentions don't count. The sources you cited are fine to include in the article to validate facts, but they don't do anything to establish the notability of the subject. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're saying that the sources should only write about the show? At least they say something like the show is one of the selected ones in the country aimed for more international exposure. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 06:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or merge to Soyuzmultfilm. Article certainly does fail SIGCOV. It's all unsourced fancruft with both citations barely mentioning the subject in passing, as stated by the nom. The show has been around three years yet a Gsearch mainly turns up this while content for the show consists of YouTube clips. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 07:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Soyuzmultfilm#TV_series (not opposed to keep; added 2 sources for verification; opposed to deletion)-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding sources. I agree with your rationale to redirect since the sources are direct links to a video platform and press releases from Soyuzmultfilm and thus don't contribute to notability as a standalone topic. Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Because this source[1] tells entirely about the show, doesn't this count as significant coverage? Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's significant, but it's not independent. At the top it says "Пресс-релизы," or press release See WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is this one[2] a press release? I don't see "Пресс-релизы" in it. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC) Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's significant, but it's not independent. At the top it says "Пресс-релизы," or press release See WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Because this source[1] tells entirely about the show, doesn't this count as significant coverage? Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Kind of hard for anyone to verify who doesn't understand Russian. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 08:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I myself can’t read Russian web pages, but I can translate them. The same should apply to everyone else. Red White Blue and Yellow (talk) 16:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding sources. I agree with your rationale to redirect since the sources are direct links to a video platform and press releases from Soyuzmultfilm and thus don't contribute to notability as a standalone topic. Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Hungama TV#Animated series. Owen× ☎ 11:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Chacha Bhatija (TV series)[edit]
- Chacha Bhatija (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Hungama_TV#Animated series -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Hungama_TV#Animated series. RangersRus (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Wide scope, popular TV series which needs work. Will do after afd closes
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Gattu Battu[edit]
- Gattu Battu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 16:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Nickelodeon_(India)#Animated_Series: NB- can we slow down Afd nominations of Indian animated series for a few days, thanks? -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
List of 3D animation software[edit]
- List of 3D animation software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability/usefulness not demonstrated. Just a list of licenses of softwares. Greatder (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation, Software, and Lists. Greatder (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: This list fails WP:NLIST as we cannot say that the list deserves to exist per the article's first sentence, "this is a list of 3D animation apps that have articles on Wikipedia". Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)- Why did you link something that literally contradicts what you said?
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.
Why? I Ask (talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)- Thanks for pointing that one out Why? I Ask! I think it should therefore be kept. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you link something that literally contradicts what you said?
- Keep Valid navigational list. More useful than a category since more information is shown. It is useful if you want to see a list of all the software of this type, and be able to sort it by its type of license to find what you are looking for. Additional information could be added, a column showing what year it became available, another column listing if its still being developed and if not just list when the last update was, etc. Dream Focus 16:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The mere fact that all of these have a Wikipedia page makes it a valid list under WP:LISTPURP. Why? I Ask (talk) 16:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Animaker[edit]
- Animaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm doubting that the software is notable based on the sources cited. -- Beland (talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- USNews lists it as "Best Basic Web-Based Animation Software", which is something, I guess Aaron Liu (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I can only find tutorials on how to use the software, nothing about critical reviews or discussions in RS. None of the sources in the article now are RS, some appear to be PR items. Oaktree b (talk) 13:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Star Hill Ponies[edit]
- Star Hill Ponies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, United Kingdom, and Wales. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I found a newspaper article called "Trotting towards stardom" in the South Wales Evening Post, April 1999, and one called "Titanic tricks for TV puppets" in the Western Daily Press, April 1999. Toughpigs (talk) 17:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, given what was presented here and on the page (thanks Toughpigs) or at the very least Redirect to Bumper Films, if the said sources are really found insufficient. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Withdraw, based on citations noted by Toughpigs. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Chris King and Vicki Grant[edit]
- Chris King and Vicki Grant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article doesn't have reception or signification coverage about the character, and the hero forms section was written awfully or its fully redundant; thus failing WP:GNG. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep because they were separated from the Dial H for Hero page by @Jhenderson777: to keep the page from getting too long like the Black Canary page or merge Chris King and his superhero forms to List of Marvel Comics characters: K and Vicki Grant and her superheroine forms to List of Marvel Comics characters: G in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE if the latter happens. --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Dial H for Hero#1980s series - There is nothing here except for excessively detailed, primary sourced, in-universe plot summary. And the entirety of the plot information here is already present, in more succinct form, at the main Dial H article. Pretty much the only information here that is not already included there is that ridiculously long list of "Hero Forms" and "Villains" that is completely WP:INDISCRIMINATE information that should not be included. There is no reason for this to have ever been split out to a separate article as the same information is already covered at the parent article, making this a redundant fork that should simply be redirect back to the appropriate section of the Dial H article. Rorshacma (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Namethatisnotinuse Namethatisnotinuse (talk) 22:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Comics and animation proposed deletions[edit]
Categories for discussion[edit]
Redirects for discussion[edit]
Templates for discussion[edit]
- ^ "Праздничный выпуск, музыкальное поздравление в исполнении юных звёзд и много подарков — мультсериалу «Енотки» 3 года". re-port.ru. Retrieved 2024-06-08.
- ^ "Мультсериал «Енотки» – детские мультфильмы на канале Карусель". www.karusel-tv.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 2024-06-08.