Jump to content

Digital native: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Implication of Technological and Media Landscapes: I deleted these paragraphs. They seemed to read more like an essay than a wiki article and were not pertinent to the section.
→‎Implication of Technological and Media Landscapes: I added an introductory paragraph about the role of self-perception in one's identity as a digital native. I added some supporting citations to back this up. Then, I expanded on your numbered list of qualities.
Line 48: Line 48:
Digital Natives vary in demographic based on their region's technological and media landscapes. Not everyone agrees with the language and underlying connotations of the digital native. The term, by definition, makes the assumption that all digital natives has the same familiarity with technology. Similarly, the term digital immigrants implies that this entire age group struggles with technological advancements. For instance, those on the disadvantaged side of the [[digital divide]] lack access to technology. In its application, the concept of the digital native preferences those who grow up with technology as having a special status, ignoring the significant difference between familiarity and creative application.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last=Bennett|first=Sue|date=2008|title=The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence|url=https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x?casa_token=mNmQILMYPEkAAAAA:Z9s7vkxBTYGr734X_g_3uYJYcPuu7Tvd3IHx7e71eT3a3aG7jz5fl8Bi9EZcPzORvod1iy-4jecU7cU|journal=British Journal of Educational Technology}}</ref>
Digital Natives vary in demographic based on their region's technological and media landscapes. Not everyone agrees with the language and underlying connotations of the digital native. The term, by definition, makes the assumption that all digital natives has the same familiarity with technology. Similarly, the term digital immigrants implies that this entire age group struggles with technological advancements. For instance, those on the disadvantaged side of the [[digital divide]] lack access to technology. In its application, the concept of the digital native preferences those who grow up with technology as having a special status, ignoring the significant difference between familiarity and creative application.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last=Bennett|first=Sue|date=2008|title=The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence|url=https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x?casa_token=mNmQILMYPEkAAAAA:Z9s7vkxBTYGr734X_g_3uYJYcPuu7Tvd3IHx7e71eT3a3aG7jz5fl8Bi9EZcPzORvod1iy-4jecU7cU|journal=British Journal of Educational Technology}}</ref>


Digital Natives are determined based on their educational and cultural backgrounds as well as their access to technology<ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=Akçayır|first=Murat|last2=Dündar|first2=Hakan|last3=Akçayır|first3=Gökçe|date=2016-07-01|title=What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980?|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216301534|journal=Computers in Human Behavior|language=en|volume=60|pages=435–440|doi=10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089|issn=0747-5632}}</ref>. As the adoption of digital technology hasn't been a unified phenomenon worldwide, digital natives are not all in the same age group. Self-perception also plays a role: individuals who do not feel confident in their use of technology will not be considered a native regardless of the formally mentioned factors<ref name=":7" />.
The classification of people into digital natives and digital immigrants is controversial. Some digital immigrants surpass digital natives in tech savvy, but there is a belief that early exposure to technology fundamentally changes the way people learn<ref name=":4" />. The term "digital immigrant" overlooks the fact that many people born before the digital age were the inventors, designers, developers and first users of digital technology and in this sense could be regarded as the original "natives". To consider use of digital technology by current adolescents as deep knowledge and understanding is misleading and unhelpful to the discourse. The term also discounts the broader and more holistic knowledge, experience and understandings that older generations may have about digital technologies and their potential place in society<ref name=":42">{{Cite journal|last=Bennett|first=Sue|date=2008|title=The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence|url=https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x?casa_token=mNmQILMYPEkAAAAA:Z9s7vkxBTYGr734X_g_3uYJYcPuu7Tvd3IHx7e71eT3a3aG7jz5fl8Bi9EZcPzORvod1iy-4jecU7cU|journal=British Journal of Educational Technology}}</ref>.


The terminologies that can refer to certain generations like "Digital Natives" are made because these groups can create their own culture and characteristics. Here are some of the culture and characteristics of "Digital Natives":
# They feel familiar with digital devices. 54% of them have a smartphone as a first personal mobile phone.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ibm.com/account/reg/kr-ko/signup?formid=urx-14003|title=Register|date=2017-10-05|website=IBM|language=en-US|access-date=2019-12-19}}</ref>

# They tend to be individualistic. This might be because they are affected by environmental elements like their parents (Generation X).
# They feel familiar with digital devices. 54% of them have a smartphone as a first personal mobile phone. These devices are used for entertainment and as a requirement in educational endeavors.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Thompson|first=Penny|date=2015-09-01|title=How digital native learners describe themselves|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9295-3|journal=Education and Information Technologies|language=en|volume=20|issue=3|pages=467–484|doi=10.1007/s10639-013-9295-3|issn=1573-7608}}</ref>
⚫
# They are realistic. They are usually raised in an affluent environment, but due to the prolonged economic recession and the [[Fourth Industrial Revolution]], they think their future is not clear. This kind of thinking makes them focus more on their reality.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thescoop.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=32019|title=미래권력 Z세대 "앞머리에 헤어롤이요? 개취죠!"|date=2018-09-21|website=더스쿠프|language=ko|access-date=2019-12-19}}</ref>
# They tend to be [[Individualism|individualistic]].
# They are able to multitask or focus on a single medium when needed. <ref name=":8" />
⚫
# They are realistic. They are usually raised in an affluent environment, but due to the prolonged economic recession and the [[Fourth Industrial Revolution]], they think their future is not clear. This kind of thinking makes them focus more on their reality.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 16:52, 18 November 2021

This article is about people of the Digital Age. For the Yasutaka Nakata album, see Digital Native (album). For objects of the age, see Born-digital.
Adults using smartphones

The term digital native describes a person who has grown up in the information age. Often referring to millennials, Generation Z, and Generation Alpha, these individuals can consume digital information and stimuli quickly and comfortably through devices and platforms such as computers, mobile phones, and social media. Instant gratification and reward systems, such as through games, are preferred as their attention spans are shorter than previous generations.

Digital natives are distinguished from digital immigrants, people who grew up in a world dominated by print and television because they were born within the advent of the Internet.[1] These two terms are often used to describe the digital generation gap in terms of the ability of technological use among people born after 1980 and those born before.[2] The term digital native is a highly contested concept, being considered by many education researchers as a persistent myth not founded on empirical evidence[3][4] and many argue for a more nuanced approach for understanding the relationship between digital media, learning and youth.

Origin

Native–immigrant analogy terms, referring to age groups' relationships with and understanding of the Internet, were used as early as 1995 by John Perry Barlow in an interview,[5] and used again in 1996 as part of the Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.[6]

The specific terms "digital native" and "digital immigrant" were popularized by education consultant Marc Prensky in his 2001 article entitled Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, in which he relates the contemporary decline in American education to educators' failure to understand the needs of modern students.[7] His article posited that "the arrival and rapid dissemination of digital technology in the last decade of the 20th century" had changed the way students think and process information, making it difficult for them to excel academically using the outdated teaching methods of the day. In other words, children raised in a digital, media-saturated world, require a media-rich learning environment to hold their attention, and Prensky dubbed these children "digital natives". He also goes on to say that Digital Natives have "spent their entire lives surrounded by and using computers and videogames, digital music players, videocams, cell phones and all other toys and tools of the digital age".[8][9]

Globally, 30 percent of the population born between 1988 and 1998 had used the Internet for over five years as of 2013.[10]

Conceptualization and development

Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Marc Prensky defines the term "digital native" and applies it to a new group of students enrolling in educational establishments referring to the young generation as "native speakers" of the digital language of computers, videos, video games, social media and other sites on the internet. Contextually, his ideas were introduced after a decade of worry over increased diagnosis of children with ADD and ADHD,[11] which itself turned out to be largely overblown.[12] Prensky did not strictly define the digital native in his 2001 article, but it was later, arbitrarily, applied to children born after 1980, because computer bulletin board systems and Usenet were already in use at the time.

The idea became popular among educators and parents, whose children fell within Prensky's definition of a digital native, and has since been embraced as an effective marketing tool.[13] It is important to note that Prensky's original paper was not a scientific one, and that no empirical data exists to support his claims. However, the concept has been widely addressed in the academic literature since, mainly in education research,[14][15] but also in health research.[16]

Prensky has since abandoned his digital native metaphor in favor "digital wisdom".[17] More recently, the Digital Visitor and Resident idea has been proposed as an alternative to understanding the various ways individuals engage with digital technology. It is also argued that digital native and digital immigrant are labels that oversimplify the classification scheme and that there are categories that can be considered "undetermined" based from the framework of the previous assignations.[18]

The critique of Prensky's conceptualization has resulted in further refinement of the terms.[2] For instance, digital natives have been further classified into three: the avoiders, minimalists, and enthusiastic participants. The avoiders are those who do not depend on technological devices and use technology minimally while the minimalists make use of the trends, although not as often as the enthusiastic participants.[2]

People who were "born digital", first appeared in a series of presentations by Josh Spear beginning in May 2007.[19][20] A Digital Native research project[21] is being run jointly by the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School and the Research Center for Information Law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. A collaborative research project[22] is being run by Hivos, Netherlands and the Bangalore-based Centre for Internet and Society. The Net Generation Encountering e-learning at university project[23] funded by the UK research councils was completed in March 2010. More recently the Museum of Social Media,[24] launched in 2012, has included an exhibition about "Digital Natives & Friends."

Conflicts Between Generations

A child using a tablet

Because many digital immigrants are used to a life without digital technology or may be hesitant to adapt to it [25], they can sometimes be at variance with digital natives in their view of it.[25] The everyday regimen of work-life is becoming more technologically dependent with advancements such as computers in offices, improved telecommunication, and more complex machinery in industry[26].This can make it difficult for digital immigrants to keep pace, which has the potential to create conflict between older supervisors and managers and an increasingly younger workforce.[26] Similarly, parents of digital natives clash with their children at home over gaming, texting, YouTube, Facebook and other Internet technology issues. Much of the world's Millennials and Generation Z members are digital natives.[27] According to law professor and educator John Palfrey, there may be substantial differences between digital natives and non digital natives, in terms of how people see relationships and institutions and how they access information.[28] In spite of this, the timetable for training young and old on new technology is about the same.[29]

Prensky states that education is the single largest problem facing the digital world as digital immigrant instructors, who speak an outdated language (that of the pre-digital age), are struggling to teach a population that speaks an entirely new language. Digital natives have had an increased exposure to technology, which has changed the way they interact and respond to digital devices.[30] In order to meet the unique learning needs of digital natives, teachers need to move away from traditional teaching methods that are disconnected with the way students now learn.[30] For the last 20 years,[when?] technology training for teachers has been at the forefront of policy.[31] However, immigrants suffer complications in teaching natives how to understand an environment which is "native" to them and foreign to immigrants. Teachers not only struggle with proficiency levels and their abilities to integrate technology into the classroom, but also, display resistance towards the integration of digital tools.[32] Since technology can be frustrating and complicated at times, some teachers worry about maintaining their level or professionalism within the classroom.[32] Teachers worry about appearing "unprofessional" in front of their students.[32] Although technology presents challenges in the classroom, it is still very important for teachers to understand how natural and useful these digital tools are for students.[32]

To meet the unique learning needs of digital natives, Forzani and Leu suggest that digital tools are able to respond immediately to the natural, exploratory, and interactive learning style of students today. Learning how to use these digital tools not only provides unique learning opportunities for digital natives, but they also provide necessary skills that will define their future success in the digital age. One preference to this problem is to invent computer games to teach digital natives the lessons they need to learn, no matter how serious. This ideology has already been introduced to a number of serious practicalities. For example, piloting an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in the army consists of someone sitting in front of a computer screen issuing commands to the UAV via a hand-held controller which resembles, in detail, the model of controllers that are used to play games on an Xbox 360 game console. (Jodie C Spreadbury, Army Recruiting and Training Division).[33]

Gamification as a teaching tool has sparked interest in education, and Gee suggests this is because games have special properties that books cannot offer for digital natives.[34] For instance, gamification provides an interactive environment for students to engage and practice 21st century skills such as collaboration, critical thinking, problem solving, and digital literacy. Gee presents four reasons why gamification provides a distinct way of learning to promote 21st century skills. First, games are based on problem solving and not on ones ability to memorize content knowledge. Second, gamification promotes creativity in digital natives where they are encouraged to think like a designer or modify to redesign games. Third, digital natives are beginning to co-author their games through the choices they make to solve problems and face challenges. Therefore, students' thinking is stimulated to promote metacognition since they have to think about their choices and how they will alter the course and outcome of the game. Lastly, through online gaming, digital natives are able to collaborate and learn in a more social environment.[34] Based on the literature, one can see the potential and unique benefits digital tools have. For example, online games help digital natives meet their unique learning needs. Furthermore, online gaming seems to provide an interactive and engaging environment that promotes the necessary skills digital natives will need to be successful in their future.

Implication of Technological and Media Landscapes

Different approaches to educate the digital native

Digital Natives vary in demographic based on their region's technological and media landscapes. Not everyone agrees with the language and underlying connotations of the digital native. The term, by definition, makes the assumption that all digital natives has the same familiarity with technology. Similarly, the term digital immigrants implies that this entire age group struggles with technological advancements. For instance, those on the disadvantaged side of the digital divide lack access to technology. In its application, the concept of the digital native preferences those who grow up with technology as having a special status, ignoring the significant difference between familiarity and creative application.[35]

Digital Natives are determined based on their educational and cultural backgrounds as well as their access to technology[36]. As the adoption of digital technology hasn't been a unified phenomenon worldwide, digital natives are not all in the same age group. Self-perception also plays a role: individuals who do not feel confident in their use of technology will not be considered a native regardless of the formally mentioned factors[36].

The terminologies that can refer to certain generations like "Digital Natives" are made because these groups can create their own culture and characteristics. Here are some of the culture and characteristics of "Digital Natives":

  1. They feel familiar with digital devices. 54% of them have a smartphone as a first personal mobile phone. These devices are used for entertainment and as a requirement in educational endeavors.[37]
  2. They tend to be individualistic.
  3. They are able to multitask or focus on a single medium when needed. [37]
  4. They are realistic. They are usually raised in an affluent environment, but due to the prolonged economic recession and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, they think their future is not clear. This kind of thinking makes them focus more on their reality.

See also

References

  1. ^ Prensky, Marc (September 2001). "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1". On the Horizon. 9 (5): 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816. ISSN 1074-8121.
  2. ^ a b c Zaphiris, Panayiotis; Ioannou, Andri (2018). Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Learning and Teaching: 5th International Conference, LCT 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. p. 100. ISBN 9783319911519.
  3. ^ Margaryan, Anoush (2011). "Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies". Computers & Education. Volume 56. {{cite journal}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  4. ^ Bennett, Sue (2008). "The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence". British Journal of Educational Technology.
  5. ^ Tunbridge, Nat (1995). "The Cyberspace Cowboy." Barlow: "I would say that, generally speaking, at this stage, if you're over 25, you're an immigrant. If you're under 25 you're closer to being a native, in terms of understanding what it is and having a real basic sense of it." Australian Personal Computer, September, p. 2-4.
  6. ^ "You are terrified of your own children, since they are natives in a world where you will always be immigrants" Archived 2013-10-23 at the Wayback Machine
  7. ^ Prensky, Marc (October 2001). "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants" (PDF). On the Horizon. 9 (5): 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816.
  8. ^ Joiner, R, Gavin, J, Brosnan, M, Cromby, J, Gregory, H, Guiller, J, Maras, P & Moon, A 2013, 'Comparing first and second generation digital natives' internet use, internet anxiety, and internet identification', Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 549-552.
  9. ^ Prensky, M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. 2001; 9:5:1-6.
  10. ^ "Where in the World are Young People Using the Internet?". Georgia Tech News. ATLANTA, GA. October 7, 2013.
  11. ^ Stolzer, J. M. (January 1, 2007). "The ADHD Epidemic in America". Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry. 9 (2): 109–116. doi:10.1891/152315007782021204. S2CID 143352643.
  12. ^ Merrow, John. "Attention Deficit Disorder: A Dubious Diagnosis?". www.pbs.org. PBS.[dead link]
  13. ^ Kipke, David. "A Millennial's Digital Marketing Worldview". www.adknowledge.com. Archived from the original on 2015-04-23. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
  14. ^ Jones, C, Shao, B. The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education, York: Higher Education Academy, 2011
  15. ^ Helsper, E, Enyon, R. Digital natives: where is the evidence? Br Educ Res J 2009; 36: 503–520
  16. ^ Cowey, Aasha E.; Potts, Henry W W. (2018). "What can we learn from second generation digital natives? A qualitative study of undergraduates' views of digital health at one London university". Digital Health. 4: 205520761878815. doi:10.1177/2055207618788156. PMC 6055101. PMID 30046453.
  17. ^ Prensky, Marc. "From Digital Native to Digital Wisdom" (PDF). marcprensky.com. Marc Prensky. Retrieved 4 April 2015.
  18. ^ Sharpe, Rhona; Beetham, Helen; Freitas, Sara de (2010-07-02). Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How Learners are Shaping their Own Experiences. Routledge. ISBN 9781136973871.
  19. ^ "Josh Spear presentation at Zeitgeist Europe 2007". Youtube.com. Retrieved 2013-12-10.
  20. ^ "Wanna go to digital rehab? No No No: Talking to the born digital generation". Iabuk.net. 2007-11-18. Archived from the original on 2008-08-21. Retrieved 2013-12-10.
  21. ^ digital-native.org
  22. ^ "Digital Natives with a Cause? / Themes / Hivos Knowledge Programme / Home - Ontwikkelingsorganisatie Hivos". Hivos.net. Archived from the original on 2013-12-13. Retrieved 2013-12-10.
  23. ^ "The Net Generation encountering e-learning at university". Open.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2013-12-13. Retrieved 2013-12-10.
  24. ^ "Communication & Media Studies - Museum of Social Media: HOME - Wiley Online Library". Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 2013-12-10.
  25. ^ a b Wang, Qian; Myers, Michael D.; Sundaram, David (2013-12). "Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants: Towards a Model of Digital Fluency". Business & Information Systems Engineering. 5 (6): 409–419. doi:10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y. ISSN 1867-0202. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  26. ^ a b Brody, Charles J.; Rubin, Beth A. (2011-02-07). "GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECTS OF INSECURITY, RESTRUCTURED WORKPLACE TEMPORALITIES, AND TECHNOLOGY ON ORGANIZATIONAL LOYALTY". Sociological Spectrum. 31 (2): 163–192. doi:10.1080/02732173.2011.541341. ISSN 0273-2173.
  27. ^ Shapiro, Evan. "TV: An Intervention." HuffPost TV. June 5, 2012
  28. ^ Mike Musgrove (October 17, 2008). "Talkin' About the Digital Generation". Washington Post. Retrieved 2013-02-03. Palfrey: ... people who were born today... may well see relationships differently, they may see institutions differently, ...
  29. ^ Salajan, F.; Schonwetter, D.; Cleghorn, B. (2010). "Student and faculty inter-generational digital divide: fact or fiction?". Computers and Education. 53 (3): 1393–1403. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.017.
  30. ^ a b Morgan, 2014
  31. ^ Lei, J (2009). "Digital natives as preservice teachers: what technology preparation is needed?". Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, Spring. 25 (3): 89.
  32. ^ a b c d Hicks, 2011
  33. ^ Public email b November 4th, 2007 by Paul Maunder s
  34. ^ a b Gee, J. P. (2012). The old and the new in the new digital literacies. The Educational Forum, 76, 418-420
  35. ^ Bennett, Sue (2008). "The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence". British Journal of Educational Technology.
  36. ^ a b Akçayır, Murat; Dündar, Hakan; Akçayır, Gökçe (2016-07-01). "What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980?". Computers in Human Behavior. 60: 435–440. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089. ISSN 0747-5632.
  37. ^ a b Thompson, Penny (2015-09-01). "How digital native learners describe themselves". Education and Information Technologies. 20 (3): 467–484. doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9295-3. ISSN 1573-7608.

Notes

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_native&oldid=1055920797"