Grey fantail: Difference between revisions
Fix cite date error |
Add more information about R. albiscapa while looking for some relevant publish papers |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|synonyms_ref = <ref name=avibase>{{avibase|B53EFC8D12A1C067|New Zealand or grey fantail}}</ref> |
|synonyms_ref = <ref name=avibase>{{avibase|B53EFC8D12A1C067|New Zealand or grey fantail}}</ref> |
||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''grey fantail''' (''Rhipidura albiscapa'') is a small insectivorous bird |
The '''grey fantail''' (''Rhipidura albiscapa'') is a small insectivorous bird. Both males and females are monochromatic.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Munro |first=Kat |date=2007-09-24 |title=Breeding behaviour and ecology of the grey fantail (Rhipidura albiscapa) |url=https://www.publish.csiro.au/zo/ZO07025 |journal=Australian Journal of Zoology |language=en |volume=55 |issue=4 |pages=257–265 |doi=10.1071/ZO07025 |issn=1446-5698}}</ref> It is a common [[fantail]] found in [[Australia]], the [[Solomon Islands]], [[Vanuatu]] and [[New Caledonia]]. The species is considered by many to be [[Biological specificity#Conspecific|conspecific]] with the [[New Zealand fantail]] (''Rhipidura fuliginosa'');<ref name="Birdlife International">[http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=6005 Bird Life International, Grey Fantail], grey fantail entry on the Birdlife International Database including explanation as to why grey and New Zealand fantails are not considered to be separate species.</ref> however, differences in [[bird vocalization|its calls]] lead some authorities to treat it as a separate species.<ref name=avibase/><ref>{{cite book|last1=Christidis|first1=Les|last2=Boles |first2=Walter|title=Systematics and taxonomy of Australian Birds|url=https://archive.org/details/systematicstaxon00chri|url-access=limited|publisher=CSIRO Publishing|location=Collingwood, Vic|year=2008|pages=[https://archive.org/details/systematicstaxon00chri/page/n205 195]–196|isbn=978-0-643-06511-6}}</ref>The studies of grey fantail in 1999 by Richard Schodde and Ian Mason recommended that Tasmanian grey fantail was formally classified as ''R. albiscapa'' and New Zealand fantails populations as ''R. fuliginosa''<ref>{{Cite book |last=Schodde |first=Richard |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/704565413 |title=The directory of Australian birds. Volume 1, Passerines : a taxonomic and zoogeographic atlas of the biodiversity of birds in Australia and its territories |date=1999 |publisher=CSIRO Pub |others=Ian J. Mason |isbn=978-0-643-10086-2 |location=Collingwood, VIC |oclc=704565413}}</ref> |
||
==Description== |
==Description== |
||
[[File:Grey Fantail - juvenile02.jpg|left|thumb|Juvenile]] |
[[File:Grey Fantail - juvenile02.jpg|left|thumb|Juvenile]] |
||
This |
This species is mid-to-dark grey or grey-brown above, lighter (often yellowish/orange) below, with a white throat, white markings over the eye, and (depending on the [[Race (biology)|race]]) either white-edged or entirely white outer tail feathers. It grows to {{Convert|16|cm|abbr=on}} in length, of which half is the tail, which, as the name implies, is often displayed fanned out. This reveals that the outer tail feathers are light and the centre ones are dark. Some races, such as ''keasti'', have a darker plumage.<ref>{{cite book |last=Morcombe |first=Michael |title=Field Guide to Australian Birds |date=2000 |publisher=Steve Parish Publishing |isbn=187628210X |location=Archerfield, Queensland |pages=300–301}}</ref> |
||
During waking hours the bird is almost never still. It flits from perch to perch, sometimes on the ground but mostly on the twigs of a tree or any other convenient object, looking out for flying insects. The birds are not shy, and will often flit within a few metres of people, especially in forested areas and suburban gardens. In doing so, it is able to catch any small flying insects that may have been disturbed by human activities such as walking or digging. |
This species is easy to be found while walking in eucalypt forest, rainforest, mangroves, heath, and wooded habitat<ref>{{Cite web |title=Fantails (Rhipiduridae) {{!}} Encyclopedia.com |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/fantails-rhipiduridae |access-date=2022-04-01 |website=www.encyclopedia.com}}</ref>. During waking hours the bird is almost never still. It flits from perch to perch, sometimes on the ground but mostly on the twigs of a tree or any other convenient object, looking out for flying insects.This species is able to catch the flying insect in involved intricate acrobatic chases. The birds are not shy, and will often flit within a few metres of people, especially in forested areas and suburban gardens. In doing so, it is able to catch any small flying insects that may have been disturbed by human activities such as walking or digging. The bird's call is an almost metallic ''cheek'', either as a single sound or (more often) repeated as a chattering. |
||
The bird's call is an almost metallic ''cheek'', either as a single sound or (more often) repeated as a chattering. |
|||
== Taxonomy == |
== Taxonomy == |
||
=== Genetics === |
=== Genetics === |
||
The populations of Australian |
The populations of Australian fantails were complex and they were all formerly considered conspecific due to their closely related based on their song, habitat, tailcoloration, and clutch size<ref name=":02">{{Cite web |last=Lu, S., Bergner L.M., and Chesser, T.R. |date=2014 |title=Patterns of genetic variation in the Australian Grey Fantail complex: |
||
Rhipidura albiscapa and Rhipidura phasiana |url=https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file/2014-lu-poster.pdf |website=Patterns of genetic variation in the Australian Grey Fantail complex: |
|||
Rhipidura albiscapa and Rhipidura phasiana}}</ref>. A recent study shows that ''R.fuliginosa'' in New Zealand and Australian ''R.albiscapa'' were sister taxa and another fantail species, named ''R.phasiana'' in the north coast of Australia, was sister to these two fantail species. Besides, within this subgroup ''R. albiscapa'' from Vanuatu and Australia were paraphyletic<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Nyári |first=Árpád S. |last2=Benz |first2=Brett W. |last3=Jønsson |first3=Knud A. |last4=Fjeldså |first4=Jon |last5=Moyle |first5=Robert G. |date=2009-11 |title=Phylogenetic relationships of fantails (Aves: Rhipiduridae) |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00397.x |journal=Zoologica Scripta |volume=38 |issue=6 |pages=553–561 |doi=10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00397.x |issn=0300-3256}}</ref> . Hence, ''R. albiscapa'' was found to be polyphyletic<ref name=":02" />. |
|||
=== '''Geographically isolated units''' === |
|||
Numerous avian of south Australia are characterised by a known biogeographical barrier, Nullarbor Plain, displaying the morphological divergence of the subspecies differentiation<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Guay |first=P.-J. |last2=Chesser |first2=R. T. |last3=Mulder |first3=R. A. |last4=Afton |first4=A. D. |last5=Paton |first5=D. C. |last6=McCracken |first6=K. G. |date=2010-12 |title=East–west genetic differentiation in Musk Ducks (Biziura lobata) of Australia suggests late Pleistocene divergence at the Nullarbor Plain |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10592-010-0097-5 |journal=Conservation Genetics |language=en |volume=11 |issue=6 |pages=2105–2120 |doi=10.1007/s10592-010-0097-5 |issn=1566-0621}}</ref>. Because of the east-west division of geographic barrier effect on their morphological divergence, the populations of R. albiscapa could be classified into five subspecies by their characteristics, such as their calls, patterns of plumage, and nest construction.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":02" /> |
|||
Five subpopulations of ''R. albiscapa'' are shown below: |
|||
''Rhipidura albiscapa keasti (eastern Australia)'' |
|||
''Rhipidura albiscapa albicauda (western Australia)'' |
|||
''Rhipidura albiscapa preissi (western Australia)'' |
|||
''Rhipidura albiscapa alisteri (eastern Australia)'' |
|||
''Rhipidura albiscapa albiscapa (Tasmania)'' |
|||
==Life cycle== |
==Life cycle== |
||
The grey fantail is territorial and it is a seasonal breeder. The birds form compact, [[cup nest|cup-shaped nests]], usually in the forks of trees, made from moss, bark and fibre, and often completed with spider's web. They raise several broods per season, usually each of three or four cream eggs spotted grey and brown. The incubation period is around two weeks and incubation and feeding duties are shared by both adults. |
|||
=== Nesting === |
|||
Most bird species typically build one nest, whereas grey fantail commonly builds more than one nest before egg-laying, and seven nests have been recorded as the highest number in the breeding season. In a recent study, there is a hypothesis explaining the nest abandonment in this species. Abandoned nests could be used for refusing the predators. Indeed, a large number of abandoned nests exposed on the trees are significantly less concealed than a nest received eggs. However, these abandoned nests were uncompleted built in response to the attention of predators such as pied currawongs because the predators may destruct the incomplete nests as looking for eggs<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Berger-Tal |first=Reut |last2=Berger-Tal |first2=Oded |last3=Munro |first3=Kat |date=2010-06 |title=Nest desertion by Grey Fantails during nest building in response to perceived predation risk |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2010.00272.x |journal=Journal of Field Ornithology |volume=81 |issue=2 |pages=151–154 |doi=10.1111/j.1557-9263.2010.00272.x |issn=0273-8570}}</ref>. Also, the size of pied currawongs is bigger than grey fantails, which presents a considerable risk for adult grey fantails. Therefore, desertion might be adaptive for grey fantail, so these nests could be used for eliminating hazards from cryptic predation<ref name=":0" />. Besides, some materials of decoy nests could be dismantled and used to construct the subsequent nest during the breeding season. Therefore, the locations of the nests are flexible during the nest-building phase, so grey fantails could choose the site with sufficient security to prepare for birth<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Beckmann |first=Christa |last2=Martin |first2=Kathy |date=2016-03-11 |title=Testing hypotheses about the function of repeated nest abandonment as a life history strategy in a passerine bird |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12361 |journal=Ibis |volume=158 |issue=2 |pages=335–342 |doi=10.1111/ibi.12361 |issn=0019-1019}}</ref>. The birds form compact, [[Cup nest|cup-shaped nests]], usually in the forks of trees, made from moss, bark and fibre, and often completed with spider's web. According to the records of the sizes of the nests by Richard and Donaghey, which were observed in three regions of southern Australia, the average sizes of nests were 5.7 cm (5.1-6.4 cm) external diameter, 4.1 cm (3.8-4.4 cm) internal diameter, and 2.9 cm (2.5-3.2 cm) internal depth.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Donaghey |first=Richard H. |date=2015-09-07 |title=Nest and egg of the Dimorphic Fantail Rhipidura brachyrhyncha and a review of clutch-sizes in New Guinean passerines |url=https://www.birdlife.org.au/afo/index.php/afo/article/view/19 |journal=Australian Field Ornithology |language=en-US |volume=32 |issue=2}}</ref>. |
|||
=== Breeding === |
|||
The grey fantail is territorial and it is a seasonal breeder. They raise several broods per season, usually each of three or four cream eggs spotted grey and brown. The incubation period is around two weeks and incubation and feeding duties are shared by both adults. During the breeding season, the mass of testes of male grey fantails grows larger than in the non-breeding season<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hoffman |first=Joseph I. |last2=Munro |first2=Kat |last3=Kilner |first3=Rebecca M. |last4=Amos |first4=William |date=2010-04 |title=High rates of infidelity in the Grey Fantail Rhipidura albiscapa suggest that testis size may be a better correlate of extra-pair paternity than sexual dimorphism |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.01007.x |journal=Ibis |language=en |volume=152 |issue=2 |pages=378–385 |doi=10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.01007.x}}</ref>. The growth of testes sizes could be subject to sperm competition, like other species exhibiting morphological traits<ref name=":0" />. Also, male birds have pronounced cloacal protuberances. This change of morphology is associated with polygynandry and the increase in copulation chance. Despite most of the grey fantails being a season-long monogamous pair, a small number of male birds seeking extra-pair copulation have been recorded. To seek extra-pair copulation, these male birds invades neighbouring territories and waits at the nest where the female birds were not incubating<ref name=":0" />. The intruding male might coerce a resident female into accepting extra-pair male copulation. Moreover, the aggression of the male bird could act as a deterrent to the female bird leading to delay ovulation, allowing the male to re-mate. This way increases the likelihood of the male becoming the sole fertiliser of eggs<ref name=":0" />. |
|||
=== Migratory === |
|||
The population of ''R. albiscapa'' in Australia and Tasmania are migratory. The sub-population of ''R. a. albiscapa'' is mainly breeding in Tasmania. When the winter comes, they migrate to NSW and group with another sub-population, ''R. a. alisteri''. A small number of ''preissi'' individuals which is recognized in easternmost Australia has recorded in the subpopulation of ''keasti'' and ''alisteri.''<ref name=":02" /> |
|||
==Gallery== |
==Gallery== |
||
Revision as of 04:13, 1 April 2022
| Grey fantail | |
|---|---|
| |
| Rhipidura albiscapa albicauda | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Aves |
| Order: | Passeriformes |
| Family: | Rhipiduridae |
| Genus: | Rhipidura |
| Species: | R. albiscapa
|
| Binomial name | |
| Rhipidura albiscapa Gould, 1840
| |
| Synonyms[2] | |
|
Rhipidura fuliginosa | |
The grey fantail (Rhipidura albiscapa) is a small insectivorous bird. Both males and females are monochromatic.[3] It is a common fantail found in Australia, the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and New Caledonia. The species is considered by many to be conspecific with the New Zealand fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa);[4] however, differences in its calls lead some authorities to treat it as a separate species.[2][5]The studies of grey fantail in 1999 by Richard Schodde and Ian Mason recommended that Tasmanian grey fantail was formally classified as R. albiscapa and New Zealand fantails populations as R. fuliginosa[6]
Description
This species is mid-to-dark grey or grey-brown above, lighter (often yellowish/orange) below, with a white throat, white markings over the eye, and (depending on the race) either white-edged or entirely white outer tail feathers. It grows to 16 cm (6.3 in) in length, of which half is the tail, which, as the name implies, is often displayed fanned out. This reveals that the outer tail feathers are light and the centre ones are dark. Some races, such as keasti, have a darker plumage.[7]
This species is easy to be found while walking in eucalypt forest, rainforest, mangroves, heath, and wooded habitat[8]. During waking hours the bird is almost never still. It flits from perch to perch, sometimes on the ground but mostly on the twigs of a tree or any other convenient object, looking out for flying insects.This species is able to catch the flying insect in involved intricate acrobatic chases. The birds are not shy, and will often flit within a few metres of people, especially in forested areas and suburban gardens. In doing so, it is able to catch any small flying insects that may have been disturbed by human activities such as walking or digging. The bird's call is an almost metallic cheek, either as a single sound or (more often) repeated as a chattering.
Taxonomy
Genetics
The populations of Australian fantails were complex and they were all formerly considered conspecific due to their closely related based on their song, habitat, tailcoloration, and clutch size[9]. A recent study shows that R.fuliginosa in New Zealand and Australian R.albiscapa were sister taxa and another fantail species, named R.phasiana in the north coast of Australia, was sister to these two fantail species. Besides, within this subgroup R. albiscapa from Vanuatu and Australia were paraphyletic[10] . Hence, R. albiscapa was found to be polyphyletic[9].
Geographically isolated units
Numerous avian of south Australia are characterised by a known biogeographical barrier, Nullarbor Plain, displaying the morphological divergence of the subspecies differentiation[11]. Because of the east-west division of geographic barrier effect on their morphological divergence, the populations of R. albiscapa could be classified into five subspecies by their characteristics, such as their calls, patterns of plumage, and nest construction.[10][9]
Five subpopulations of R. albiscapa are shown below:
Rhipidura albiscapa keasti (eastern Australia)
Rhipidura albiscapa albicauda (western Australia)
Rhipidura albiscapa preissi (western Australia)
Rhipidura albiscapa alisteri (eastern Australia)
Rhipidura albiscapa albiscapa (Tasmania)
Life cycle
Nesting
Most bird species typically build one nest, whereas grey fantail commonly builds more than one nest before egg-laying, and seven nests have been recorded as the highest number in the breeding season. In a recent study, there is a hypothesis explaining the nest abandonment in this species. Abandoned nests could be used for refusing the predators. Indeed, a large number of abandoned nests exposed on the trees are significantly less concealed than a nest received eggs. However, these abandoned nests were uncompleted built in response to the attention of predators such as pied currawongs because the predators may destruct the incomplete nests as looking for eggs[12]. Also, the size of pied currawongs is bigger than grey fantails, which presents a considerable risk for adult grey fantails. Therefore, desertion might be adaptive for grey fantail, so these nests could be used for eliminating hazards from cryptic predation[3]. Besides, some materials of decoy nests could be dismantled and used to construct the subsequent nest during the breeding season. Therefore, the locations of the nests are flexible during the nest-building phase, so grey fantails could choose the site with sufficient security to prepare for birth[13]. The birds form compact, cup-shaped nests, usually in the forks of trees, made from moss, bark and fibre, and often completed with spider's web. According to the records of the sizes of the nests by Richard and Donaghey, which were observed in three regions of southern Australia, the average sizes of nests were 5.7 cm (5.1-6.4 cm) external diameter, 4.1 cm (3.8-4.4 cm) internal diameter, and 2.9 cm (2.5-3.2 cm) internal depth.[14].
Breeding
The grey fantail is territorial and it is a seasonal breeder. They raise several broods per season, usually each of three or four cream eggs spotted grey and brown. The incubation period is around two weeks and incubation and feeding duties are shared by both adults. During the breeding season, the mass of testes of male grey fantails grows larger than in the non-breeding season[15]. The growth of testes sizes could be subject to sperm competition, like other species exhibiting morphological traits[3]. Also, male birds have pronounced cloacal protuberances. This change of morphology is associated with polygynandry and the increase in copulation chance. Despite most of the grey fantails being a season-long monogamous pair, a small number of male birds seeking extra-pair copulation have been recorded. To seek extra-pair copulation, these male birds invades neighbouring territories and waits at the nest where the female birds were not incubating[3]. The intruding male might coerce a resident female into accepting extra-pair male copulation. Moreover, the aggression of the male bird could act as a deterrent to the female bird leading to delay ovulation, allowing the male to re-mate. This way increases the likelihood of the male becoming the sole fertiliser of eggs[3].
Migratory
The population of R. albiscapa in Australia and Tasmania are migratory. The sub-population of R. a. albiscapa is mainly breeding in Tasmania. When the winter comes, they migrate to NSW and group with another sub-population, R. a. alisteri. A small number of preissi individuals which is recognized in easternmost Australia has recorded in the subpopulation of keasti and alisteri.[9]
Gallery
References
- ^ BirdLife International (2016). "Rhipidura albiscapa". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016: e.T22735714A104329202. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22735714A104329202.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
- ^ a b "New Zealand or grey fantail". Avibase.
- ^ a b c d e Munro, Kat (2007-09-24). "Breeding behaviour and ecology of the grey fantail (Rhipidura albiscapa)". Australian Journal of Zoology. 55 (4): 257–265. doi:10.1071/ZO07025. ISSN 1446-5698.
- ^ Bird Life International, Grey Fantail, grey fantail entry on the Birdlife International Database including explanation as to why grey and New Zealand fantails are not considered to be separate species.
- ^ Christidis, Les; Boles, Walter (2008). Systematics and taxonomy of Australian Birds. Collingwood, Vic: CSIRO Publishing. pp. 195–196. ISBN 978-0-643-06511-6.
- ^ Schodde, Richard (1999). The directory of Australian birds. Volume 1, Passerines : a taxonomic and zoogeographic atlas of the biodiversity of birds in Australia and its territories. Ian J. Mason. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Pub. ISBN 978-0-643-10086-2. OCLC 704565413.
- ^ Morcombe, Michael (2000). Field Guide to Australian Birds. Archerfield, Queensland: Steve Parish Publishing. pp. 300–301. ISBN 187628210X.
- ^ "Fantails (Rhipiduridae) | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 2022-04-01.
- ^ a b c d Lu, S., Bergner L.M., and Chesser, T.R. (2014). "Patterns of genetic variation in the Australian Grey Fantail complex: Rhipidura albiscapa and Rhipidura phasiana" (PDF). Patterns of genetic variation in the Australian Grey Fantail complex: Rhipidura albiscapa and Rhipidura phasiana.
{{cite web}}: line feed character in|title=at position 70 (help); line feed character in|website=at position 70 (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Nyári, Árpád S.; Benz, Brett W.; Jønsson, Knud A.; Fjeldså, Jon; Moyle, Robert G. (2009-11). "Phylogenetic relationships of fantails (Aves: Rhipiduridae)". Zoologica Scripta. 38 (6): 553–561. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00397.x. ISSN 0300-3256.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Guay, P.-J.; Chesser, R. T.; Mulder, R. A.; Afton, A. D.; Paton, D. C.; McCracken, K. G. (2010-12). "East–west genetic differentiation in Musk Ducks (Biziura lobata) of Australia suggests late Pleistocene divergence at the Nullarbor Plain". Conservation Genetics. 11 (6): 2105–2120. doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0097-5. ISSN 1566-0621.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Berger-Tal, Reut; Berger-Tal, Oded; Munro, Kat (2010-06). "Nest desertion by Grey Fantails during nest building in response to perceived predation risk". Journal of Field Ornithology. 81 (2): 151–154. doi:10.1111/j.1557-9263.2010.00272.x. ISSN 0273-8570.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Beckmann, Christa; Martin, Kathy (2016-03-11). "Testing hypotheses about the function of repeated nest abandonment as a life history strategy in a passerine bird". Ibis. 158 (2): 335–342. doi:10.1111/ibi.12361. ISSN 0019-1019.
- ^ Donaghey, Richard H. (2015-09-07). "Nest and egg of the Dimorphic Fantail Rhipidura brachyrhyncha and a review of clutch-sizes in New Guinean passerines". Australian Field Ornithology. 32 (2).
- ^ Hoffman, Joseph I.; Munro, Kat; Kilner, Rebecca M.; Amos, William (2010-04). "High rates of infidelity in the Grey Fantail Rhipidura albiscapa suggest that testis size may be a better correlate of extra-pair paternity than sexual dimorphism". Ibis. 152 (2): 378–385. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.01007.x.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)
External links
- Videos, photos and sounds - Internet Bird Collection