Sauroplites: Difference between revisions
removed Category:Ankylosaurids; added Category:Nodosaurids using HotCat |
→Classification: added cladogram |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Classification== |
==Classification== |
||
Bohlin placed ''Sauroplites'' in the [[Ankylosauridae]].<ref name="Bohlin1953"/> However, Arbour considered it possible that it was a member of the [[Nodosauridae]] in view of the possession of a sacral shield consisting of fused rosettes which is unknown with unequivocal ankylosaurids, even though nodosaurid remains from Asia are rare and contentious. In a [[cladistic]] analysis she performed, ''Sauroplites'' was recovered as a nodosaurid.<ref name="Arbour2014"/> |
Bohlin placed ''Sauroplites'' in the [[Ankylosauridae]].<ref name="Bohlin1953"/> However, Arbour (2014) considered it possible that it was a member of the [[Nodosauridae]] in view of the possession of a sacral shield consisting of fused rosettes which is unknown with unequivocal ankylosaurids, even though nodosaurid remains from Asia are rare and contentious. In a [[cladistic]] analysis she performed, ''Sauroplites'' was recovered as a nodosaurid.<ref name="Arbour2014"/> |
||
In 2018, Rivera-Sylva and colleagues suggested that ''Sauroplites'' belonged to a clade of basal nodosaurids that also contained ''[[Dongyangopelta]]'' and ''[[Mymoorapelta]]'', Their cladogram is shown below:<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Rivera-Sylva|first1=H.E.|last2=Frey|first2=E.|last3=Stinnesbeck|first3=W.|last4=Carbot-Chanona|first4=G.|last5=Sanchez-Uribe|first5=I.E.|last6=Guzmán-Gutiérrez|first6=J.R.|date=2018|title=Paleodiversity of Late Cretaceous Ankylosauria from Mexico and their phylogenetic significance|journal=Swiss Journal of Palaeontology|volume=137|issue=1|pages=83–93|doi=10.1007/s13358-018-0153-1|s2cid=134924657|issn=1664-2376}}</ref> |
|||
{{clade|{{clade |
|||
|1={{clade |
|||
|1='''''Sauroplites''''' |
|||
|2=''[[Mymoorapelta]]'' |
|||
|3=''[[Dongyangopelta]]'' }} |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Gastonia burgei|Gastonia]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Gargoyleosaurus]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|label1=[[Polacanthinae]] |
|||
|1={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Hoplitosaurus]]'' |
|||
|2=''[[Polacanthus]]'' }} |
|||
|label2=[[Nodosaurinae]] |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Peloroplites]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Taohelong]]'' |
|||
|2=''[[Sauropelta]]'' |
|||
|3={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Acantholipan]]'' |
|||
|2=''Nodosaurus'' |
|||
|3={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Niobrarasaurus]]'' |
|||
|2=''[[Ahshislepelta]]'' }} |
|||
|4={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Tatankacephalus]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Silvisaurus]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=CPC 273 |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|label1=[[Panoplosaurini]] |
|||
|1={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Animantarx]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Panoplosaurus]]'' |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=Argentinian ankylosaur |
|||
|2=''[[Texasetes]]'' |
|||
|3=''[[Denversaurus]]'' |
|||
|4=''[[Edmontonia longiceps]]'' |
|||
|5=''[[Edmontonia rugosidens]]'' }} }} }} |
|||
|label2=[[Struthiosaurini]] |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Hungarosaurus]]'' |
|||
|2=''[[Europelta]]'' }} |
|||
|2={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Pawpawsaurus]]'' |
|||
|2=''[[Stegopelta]]'' |
|||
|3=''[[Struthiosaurus languedocensis]]'' |
|||
|4={{clade |
|||
|1=''[[Struthiosaurus transylvanicus]]'' |
|||
|2=''[[Struthiosaurus austriacus]]'' }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}|style=font-size:85%; line-height:85%|label1='''Nodosauridae'''}} |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
Revision as of 12:24, 24 October 2022
Sauroplites Temporal range: Early Cretaceous,
| |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Clade: | Dinosauria |
Clade: | †Ornithischia |
Clade: | †Thyreophora |
Clade: | †Ankylosauria |
Genus: | †Sauroplites Bohlin, 1953 |
Species: | †S. scutiger
|
Binomial name | |
†Sauroplites scutiger Bohlin, 1953
|
Sauroplites (meaning "saurian hoplite") is a genus of herbivorous ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of China.
Discovery and naming
In 1930, the Swedish paleontologist Anders Birger Bohlin during the Swedish-Chinese expeditions of Sven Hedin discovered an ankylosaurian fossil near Tebch in Inner Mongolia.[1]
The type species Sauroplites scutiger was named and described by Bohlin in 1953. The generic name is derived from Greek sauros or saura, "lizard", and hoplites, "hoplite, armed foot soldier". The specific name is new Latin for "shield bearer", in reference to the body armour.[1]
At first generally accepted as valid, even though a diagnosis had originally not been provided,[2] Sauroplites was later often considered a nomen dubium because it is based on fragmentary material.[3] Some believed it might actually be a specimen of another ankylosaur, Shamosaurus. However, in 2014 Victoria Megan Arbour discovered a clear unique trait, autapomorphy: the sacral or pelvic shield shows rosettes with a large central osteoderm surrounded by a single ring of smaller scutes. Other species have multiple or irregular rings. She concluded that Sauroplites was a valid taxon.[2]
The specimens were not given an inventory number and are today lost, though some casts are present in the American Museum of Natural History as specimen AMNH 2074.[2] They were found in a layer of the Zhidan Group, probably dating from the Barremian to Aptian stages. The carcass had been deposited on its back and the bones had been eroded away, apart from some ribs and perhaps a piece of an ischium, leaving parts of the body armour in a largely articulated position.[1]
Description
The large central osteoderms of the rosettes are rather flat and have a diameter of ten centimetres. More to the front oval osteoderms, with an asymmetric low keel, cover the back, with a length of up to forty centimetres. Thirty centimetre osteoderms cover the sides.[1]
Classification
Bohlin placed Sauroplites in the Ankylosauridae.[1] However, Arbour (2014) considered it possible that it was a member of the Nodosauridae in view of the possession of a sacral shield consisting of fused rosettes which is unknown with unequivocal ankylosaurids, even though nodosaurid remains from Asia are rare and contentious. In a cladistic analysis she performed, Sauroplites was recovered as a nodosaurid.[2]
In 2018, Rivera-Sylva and colleagues suggested that Sauroplites belonged to a clade of basal nodosaurids that also contained Dongyangopelta and Mymoorapelta, Their cladogram is shown below:[4]
Nodosauridae |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e B. Bohlin, 1953, Fossil reptiles from Mongolia and Kansu. Reports from the Scientific Expedition to the North-western Provinces of China under Leadership of Dr. Sven Hedin. VI. Vertebrate Palaeontology 6. The Sino-Swedish Expedition Publications 37, 113 pp
- ^ a b c d Arbour, Victoria Megan, 2014, Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of the ankylosaurid dinosaurs. Ph.D thesis, University of Alberta
- ^ Coombs, W.P., Jr. & T. Maryańska (1990), "Ankylosauria" in: D.B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, & H. Osmólka (eds), The Dinosauria. University of California Press, pp. 456-483
- ^ Rivera-Sylva, H.E.; Frey, E.; Stinnesbeck, W.; Carbot-Chanona, G.; Sanchez-Uribe, I.E.; Guzmán-Gutiérrez, J.R. (2018). "Paleodiversity of Late Cretaceous Ankylosauria from Mexico and their phylogenetic significance". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology. 137 (1): 83–93. doi:10.1007/s13358-018-0153-1. ISSN 1664-2376. S2CID 134924657.