Arctic geoengineering: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Nessa0116 (talk | contribs)
Added information and renamed sections
Line 41: Line 41:
}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=March 2009}} Additionally, the sea ice has a wider regional climatic role since it acts to maintain permafrost in the general region through its ability to insulate cold winter winds from the warm sea.<ref>{{cite book|author=ACIA|title=Arctic Climate Impact Assessment - Scientific Report|url=https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/arctic-arctic-climate-impact-assessment/796|year=2005|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-86509-8|pages=216–217|access-date=9 November 2018|archive-date=14 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214102010/http://amap.no/workdocs/index.cfm?dirsub=%2FACIA%2Foverview|url-status=live}}</ref>
}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=March 2009}} Additionally, the sea ice has a wider regional climatic role since it acts to maintain permafrost in the general region through its ability to insulate cold winter winds from the warm sea.<ref>{{cite book|author=ACIA|title=Arctic Climate Impact Assessment - Scientific Report|url=https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/arctic-arctic-climate-impact-assessment/796|year=2005|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-86509-8|pages=216–217|access-date=9 November 2018|archive-date=14 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214102010/http://amap.no/workdocs/index.cfm?dirsub=%2FACIA%2Foverview|url-status=live}}</ref>


== Proposed geoengineering methods ==
==Building thicker sea ice==


===Stratospheric sulfate aerosols===
It has been proposed to actively enhance the polar ice cap by spraying or pumping water onto the top of it which would build thicker sea ice.<ref name="Watts">{{cite book|last=Watts|first=Robert G.|title=Engineering Response to Global Climate Change: Planning a Research and Development Agenda|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nArq-K7ZiacC&pg=PA419|year=1997|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-56670-234-8|page=419|chapter=Cryospheric processes|access-date=9 November 2018|archive-date=30 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430182846/https://books.google.com/books?id=nArq-K7ZiacC&pg=PA419|url-status=live}}</ref> Since ice is an insulator, water on the surface of the ice tends to freeze more quickly than the content below it.
The idea to inject sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere comes from simulating volcanic eruptions<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal |last=Chen |first=Yating |last2=Liu |first2=Aobo |last3=Moore |first3=John C. |date=2020-05-15 |title=Mitigation of Arctic permafrost carbon loss through stratospheric aerosol geoengineering |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16357-8 |journal=Nature Communications |volume=11 |issue=1 |doi=10.1038/s41467-020-16357-8 |issn=2041-1723}}</ref>. Sulfate particles found in the atmosphere are used to scatter sunlight, which increase the albedo and, in theory, produces a cooler climate on earth<ref name=":8" />.


[[Ken Caldeira|Caldeira]] and [[Lowell Wood|Wood]] analyzed the effect of climate engineering in the Arctic using [[Stratospheric sulfate aerosols (geoengineering)|stratospheric sulfate aerosols]].<ref name="Caldeira">{{cite journal |last1=Caldeira |first1=K. |last2=Wood |first2=L. |date=2008-11-13 |title=Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences |publisher=The Royal Society |volume=366 |issue=1882 |pages=4039–4056 |bibcode=2008RSPTA.366.4039C |doi=10.1098/rsta.2008.0132 |issn=1364-503X |pmid=18757275 |doi-access=free}}</ref> This technique is not specific to the Arctic region. He found that ''At high latitudes, there is less sunlight deflected per unit albedo change but climate system feedbacks operate more powerfully there. These two effects largely cancel each other, making the global mean temperature response per unit top-of-atmosphere albedo change relatively insensitive to latitude.''<ref name="Caldeira" />
Thickening ice by spraying seawater onto existing ice has been proposed.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.popsci.com/node/9444 |title=Duct Tape Methods to Save the Earth: Re-Ice the Arctic |magazine=Popular Science |access-date=4 March 2009 |date=29 June 2007 |author=Rena Marie Pacella |archive-date=6 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130106105849/http://www.popsci.com/node/9444 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |publisher=Arizona State University |url=https://asunow.asu.edu/20161222-solutions-asu-scientists-propose-restoring-arctic-ice-10-million-windmills |title=ASU team proposes restoring Arctic ice with 10 million windmills |date=22 December 2016 |access-date=29 July 2018 |archive-date=29 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180729111846/https://asunow.asu.edu/20161222-solutions-asu-scientists-propose-restoring-arctic-ice-10-million-windmills |url-status=live }}</ref> Sea ice is an effective [[thermal insulator]], and thus freezing takes place much more rapidly on the top surface of the ice sheet than on the bottom. Thicker sea ice is more structurally stable and is more resistant to melting due to its increased mass. An additional benefit of this method is that the increased salt content of the melting ice will tend to strengthen downwelling currents when the ice re-melts.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Climatic Change |volume=71 |issue=1–2 |doi=10.1007/s10584-005-5933-0 |pages=203–220 |year=2005 |title=Geoengineering Downwelling Ocean Currents: A Cost Assessment |author1=S. Zhou |author2=P. C. Flynn |bibcode=2005ClCh...71..203Z |s2cid=154903691 }}</ref>

===Building thicker sea ice===

==== Mechanics ====
It has been proposed to actively enhance the polar ice cap by spraying or pumping water onto the top of it which would build thicker sea ice.<ref name="Watts">{{cite book |last=Watts |first=Robert G. |title=Engineering Response to Global Climate Change: Planning a Research and Development Agenda |publisher=CRC Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-1-56670-234-8 |page=419 |chapter=Cryospheric processes |access-date=9 November 2018 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nArq-K7ZiacC&pg=PA419 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430182846/https://books.google.com/books?id=nArq-K7ZiacC&pg=PA419 |archive-date=30 April 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |author=Rena Marie Pacella |date=29 June 2007 |title=Duct Tape Methods to Save the Earth: Re-Ice the Arctic |url=http://www.popsci.com/node/9444 |url-status=live |magazine=Popular Science |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130106105849/http://www.popsci.com/node/9444 |archive-date=6 January 2013 |access-date=4 March 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=22 December 2016 |title=ASU team proposes restoring Arctic ice with 10 million windmills |url=https://asunow.asu.edu/20161222-solutions-asu-scientists-propose-restoring-arctic-ice-10-million-windmills |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180729111846/https://asunow.asu.edu/20161222-solutions-asu-scientists-propose-restoring-arctic-ice-10-million-windmills |archive-date=29 July 2018 |access-date=29 July 2018 |publisher=Arizona State University}}</ref> Sea ice is an effective [[thermal insulator]], and thus freezing takes place much more rapidly on the top surface of the ice sheet than on the bottom. Thicker sea ice is more structurally stable and is more resistant to melting due to its increased mass. An additional benefit of this method is that the increased salt content of the melting ice will tend to strengthen downwelling currents when the ice re-melts.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=S. Zhou |author2=P. C. Flynn |year=2005 |title=Geoengineering Downwelling Ocean Currents: A Cost Assessment |journal=Climatic Change |volume=71 |issue=1–2 |pages=203–220 |bibcode=2005ClCh...71..203Z |doi=10.1007/s10584-005-5933-0 |s2cid=154903691}}</ref>


Some ice in the sea is frozen seawater. Other ice comes from glaciers, which come from compacted snow, and is thus fresh water ice.
Some ice in the sea is frozen seawater. Other ice comes from glaciers, which come from compacted snow, and is thus fresh water ice.


==== Wind power pumps to build thicker sea ice ====
If salt water ice forms on top of fresh water ice and melts, it will rapidly perforate the lower layers of the ice sheet since ice melts slower in saltwater than in freshwater.{{Full citation needed|date=July 2018}} Some have speculated that river water could be used to thicken fresh water ice if this problem is deemed important.
A proposed method to build thicker sea ice is to use wind powered water pumps. These pumps contain a buoy that has a wind turbine attached to it, which functions to transfer the wind energy to power the pump.<ref name=":9">{{Cite journal |last=Desch |first=Steven J. |last2=Smith |first2=Nathan |last3=Groppi |first3=Christopher |last4=Vargas |first4=Perry |last5=Jackson |first5=Rebecca |last6=Kalyaan |first6=Anusha |last7=Nguyen |first7=Peter |last8=Probst |first8=Luke |last9=Rubin |first9=Mark E. |last10=Singleton |first10=Heather |last11=Spacek |first11=Alexander |last12=Truitt |first12=Amanda |last13=Zaw |first13=Pye Pye |last14=Hartnett |first14=Hilairy E. |date=19 December 2016 |title=Arctic ice management: ARCTIC ICE MANAGEMENT |url=http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2016EF000410 |journal=Earth's Future |language=en |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=107–127 |doi=10.1002/2016EF000410}}</ref> The buoy also has a tank attached to it to store and release water as necessary.<ref name=":9" /> In theory pumping 1.3 meters of water on top of the ice, at the right time, could increase the ice's thickness by 1.0 meter.<ref name=":9" /> The goal of this pump is to increase ice thickness in a way that is energy efficient.<ref name=":9" /> Pumps that use wind power to drive them have been successfully used in the South pole to increase ice thickness.<ref name=":9" />


=== Glass beads to increase albedo ===
==Stratospheric sulfate aerosols==
Ice911, a non-profit organization whose goal is to reduce climate change, conducted an experiment in a lab.<ref name=":52">{{Cite web |last=Zimmer |first=Katarina |title=The daring plan to save the Arctic ice with glass |url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200923-could-geoengineering-save-the-arctic-sea-ice |access-date=2023-03-28 |website=www.bbc.com |language=en}}</ref> They found that releasing reflective material on top of ice increased its albedo.<ref name=":52" /> The reasoning behind this finding is that raising the ice's surfaces reflectivity increases its ability to reflect sunlight and therefore reduces the temperature on the ice's surface.<ref name=":52" /> Of the materials used, Ice911 found glass was not only effective in raising the ice's albedo, but it was also financially feasible and environmentally friendly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Field |first=L. |last2=Ivanova |first2=D. |last3=Bhattacharyya |first3=S. |last4=Mlaker |first4=V. |last5=Sholtz |first5=A. |last6=Decca |first6=R. |last7=Manzara |first7=A. |last8=Johnson |first8=D. |last9=Christodoulou |first9=E. |last10=Walter |first10=P. |last11=Katuri |first11=K. |date=21 May 2018 |title=Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2018EF000820 |journal=Earth's Future |language=en |volume=6 |issue=6 |pages=882–901 |doi=10.1029/2018EF000820 |issn=2328-4277}}</ref> The team then moved forward and conducted field tests in California, Minnesota, and Alaska.<ref name=":1" /> In all field testing locations, the albedo were increased in ice that had the glass beads poured on top of it compared to the ice that didn't have the glass beads added to its surface.<ref name=":1" /> The findings indicate the glass beads placed on top of the ice increased the ice's reflectivity.<ref name=":1" />


==== Concerns ====
[[Ken Caldeira|Caldeira]] and [[Lowell Wood|Wood]] analyzed the effect of climate engineering in the Arctic using [[Stratospheric sulfate aerosols (geoengineering)|stratospheric sulfate aerosols]].<ref name=Caldeira>{{cite journal | last1=Caldeira | first1=K. | last2=Wood | first2=L. | title=Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies | journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences | publisher=The Royal Society | volume=366 | issue=1882 | date=2008-11-13 | issn=1364-503X | doi=10.1098/rsta.2008.0132 | pages=4039–4056|bibcode=2008RSPTA.366.4039C| pmid=18757275| doi-access=free }}</ref> This technique is not specific to the Arctic region. He found that ''At high latitudes, there is less sunlight deflected per unit albedo change but climate system feedbacks operate more powerfully there. These two effects largely cancel each other, making the global mean temperature response per unit top-of-atmosphere albedo change relatively insensitive to latitude.''<ref name=Caldeira/>
There are concerns surrounding the effectiveness of using glass, and other reflective particles, to increase albedo.<ref name=":63">{{Cite journal |last=Webster |first=Melinda A. |last2=Warren |first2=Stephen G. |date=March 27, 2023 |title=Regional Geoengineering Using Tiny Glass Bubbles Would Accelerate the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022EF002815 |journal=Earth's Future |language=en |volume=10 |issue=10 |doi=10.1029/2022EF002815 |issn=2328-4277}}</ref> A study conducted by Webster and Warren found these particles actually increase the melting rates of sea ice.<ref name=":63" /> Webster and Warren argue spreading glass over new ice works because the new ice is formed in the months were there is little sunlight, thus the effectiveness of the glass beads can not definitively be credited to the beads themselves.<ref name=":63" /> Additionally, Webster and Warren argue the glass beads used in the study absorbed dark substances and overall decreased the albedo which could potentially lead to a faster melting rate of sea ice.<ref name=":63" />


==Influencing ocean temperature and salinity==
==Influencing ocean temperature and salinity==

Revision as of 17:21, 7 April 2023

Arctic sea ice coverage as of 2007 compared to 2005 and also compared to 1979-2000 average

Arctic Geoengineering is the attempt to influence arctic climate conditions using the methods and principles of geoengineering. As a proposed solution to climate change it is relatively new and has not yet been implemented at large scale. It is based on the principle that Arctic albedo plays a large role in regulating the Earth's temperature and that there are large-scale solutions that can preserve this.[1] Advocates for Arctic geoengineering cite that projections of sea ice loss adjusted to account for recent rapid Arctic shrinkage suggest that the Arctic will likely be free of summer sea ice sometime between 2059 and 2078 thus it would be necessary to take actions to slow or stop this.[2]

Current proposed methods include using sulfate aerosols to reflect sunlight, pumping water up to freeze on the surface, and using Hollow Glass Micro-spheres to increase albedo. These methods are hotly debated, and criticisms have been published that these methods are ineffective, counterproductive, or produce unintended consequences.[3]

Background

History

The main goal of geoengineering from the 19th to mid 20th century was to create rain for use in irrigation or as offensive military action.[4] Later, in 1965, the Johnson administration issued a report that brought the focus of geoengineering to climate change.[4] Some of the early plans for geoengineering in the Arctic came from a 2006 NASA conference on the topic of “managing solar radiation” where Lowell Wood advanced the proposition of bombarding the Arctic stratosphere with sulfates to build up an ice sheet which would “suck heat in from the mid-latitude heat bath”.[5] Other plans have since been proposed including the use of Hollow Glass Micro-spheres (HGMs).[6][7]

Motivation

The Arctic region plays an important role in the regulation of the Earth's climate. Conditions in the Arctic may suggest the existence of tipping points, including ice–albedo feedback from melting Arctic sea ice[8] and Arctic methane release from thawing permafrost and methane clathrate.[9] The speed of future retreat of the Arctic sea ice is contentious. The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report of 2007 states that "in some projections, Arctic late-summer sea ice disappears almost entirely by the latter part of the 21st century." However, the ice has since undergone unexpectedly significant retreat, reaching a record low area in summer 2007 before recovering somewhat in 2008.

A tipping point process could potentially commence as the Arctic region warms, if there is positive feedback with sufficient gain. Tim Lenton suggests that the retreat of sea ice is such a process, and the tipping may have started already.[10] Climate engineering has been proposed for preventing or reversing tipping point events in the Arctic, in particular to halt the retreat of the sea ice.

Preventing such ice loss is important for climate control, as the Arctic ice regulates global temperatures by virtue of its albedo, and also by restraining methane emissions from permafrost near the shoreline in the Arctic region.[11][12][unreliable source?] Additionally, the sea ice has a wider regional climatic role since it acts to maintain permafrost in the general region through its ability to insulate cold winter winds from the warm sea.[13]

Proposed geoengineering methods

Stratospheric sulfate aerosols

The idea to inject sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere comes from simulating volcanic eruptions[14]. Sulfate particles found in the atmosphere are used to scatter sunlight, which increase the albedo and, in theory, produces a cooler climate on earth[14].

Caldeira and Wood analyzed the effect of climate engineering in the Arctic using stratospheric sulfate aerosols.[15] This technique is not specific to the Arctic region. He found that At high latitudes, there is less sunlight deflected per unit albedo change but climate system feedbacks operate more powerfully there. These two effects largely cancel each other, making the global mean temperature response per unit top-of-atmosphere albedo change relatively insensitive to latitude.[15]

Building thicker sea ice

Mechanics

It has been proposed to actively enhance the polar ice cap by spraying or pumping water onto the top of it which would build thicker sea ice.[16][17][18] Sea ice is an effective thermal insulator, and thus freezing takes place much more rapidly on the top surface of the ice sheet than on the bottom. Thicker sea ice is more structurally stable and is more resistant to melting due to its increased mass. An additional benefit of this method is that the increased salt content of the melting ice will tend to strengthen downwelling currents when the ice re-melts.[19]

Some ice in the sea is frozen seawater. Other ice comes from glaciers, which come from compacted snow, and is thus fresh water ice.

Wind power pumps to build thicker sea ice

A proposed method to build thicker sea ice is to use wind powered water pumps. These pumps contain a buoy that has a wind turbine attached to it, which functions to transfer the wind energy to power the pump.[20] The buoy also has a tank attached to it to store and release water as necessary.[20] In theory pumping 1.3 meters of water on top of the ice, at the right time, could increase the ice's thickness by 1.0 meter.[20] The goal of this pump is to increase ice thickness in a way that is energy efficient.[20] Pumps that use wind power to drive them have been successfully used in the South pole to increase ice thickness.[20]

Glass beads to increase albedo

Ice911, a non-profit organization whose goal is to reduce climate change, conducted an experiment in a lab.[21] They found that releasing reflective material on top of ice increased its albedo.[21] The reasoning behind this finding is that raising the ice's surfaces reflectivity increases its ability to reflect sunlight and therefore reduces the temperature on the ice's surface.[21] Of the materials used, Ice911 found glass was not only effective in raising the ice's albedo, but it was also financially feasible and environmentally friendly.[22] The team then moved forward and conducted field tests in California, Minnesota, and Alaska.[22] In all field testing locations, the albedo were increased in ice that had the glass beads poured on top of it compared to the ice that didn't have the glass beads added to its surface.[22] The findings indicate the glass beads placed on top of the ice increased the ice's reflectivity.[22]

Concerns

There are concerns surrounding the effectiveness of using glass, and other reflective particles, to increase albedo.[23] A study conducted by Webster and Warren found these particles actually increase the melting rates of sea ice.[23] Webster and Warren argue spreading glass over new ice works because the new ice is formed in the months were there is little sunlight, thus the effectiveness of the glass beads can not definitively be credited to the beads themselves.[23] Additionally, Webster and Warren argue the glass beads used in the study absorbed dark substances and overall decreased the albedo which could potentially lead to a faster melting rate of sea ice.[23]

Influencing ocean temperature and salinity

It has been suggested[24] that locally influencing salinity and temperature of the Arctic Ocean, by changing the ratio of Pacific and fluvial waters entering through the Bering Strait could play a key role in preserving Arctic sea ice. The purpose would be to create a relative increase of fresh water inflow from the Yukon River, while blocking (part) of the warm and saltier waters from the Pacific Ocean. Proposed geoengineering options include a dam[25] connecting St. Lawrence Island and a threshold under the narrow part of the strait.

References

  1. ^ "Albedo and Climate | Center for Science Education". scied.ucar.edu. Retrieved 28 March 2023.
  2. ^ Boé, Julien; Hall, Alex; Qu, Xin (15 March 2009). "September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100". Nature Geoscience. 2 (5). Springer Nature: 341–343. Bibcode:2009NatGe...2..341B. doi:10.1038/ngeo467. ISSN 1752-0894.
  3. ^ Webster, Melinda A.; Warren, Stephen G. (27 March 2023). "Regional Geoengineering Using Tiny Glass Bubbles Would Accelerate the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice". Earth's Future. 10 (10). doi:10.1029/2022EF002815. ISSN 2328-4277.
  4. ^ a b McCormick, Ty. "Geoengineering: A Short History". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 28 March 2023.
  5. ^ Fleming, James R. (2007). "The Climate Engineers" (PDF). The Wilson Quarterly. Retrieved 27 March 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  6. ^ Zimmer, Katarina. "The daring plan to save the Arctic ice with glass". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 28 March 2023.
  7. ^ Webster, Melinda A.; Warren, Stephen G. (27 March 2023). "Regional Geoengineering Using Tiny Glass Bubbles Would Accelerate the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice". Earth's Future. 10 (10). doi:10.1029/2022EF002815. ISSN 2328-4277.
  8. ^ Winton, Michael (13 December 2006). "Does the Arctic sea ice have a tipping point?". Geophysical Research Letters. 33 (23). American Geophysical Union (AGU): L23504. Bibcode:2006GeoRL..3323504W. doi:10.1029/2006gl028017. ISSN 0094-8276.
  9. ^ Archer, D.; Buffett, B.; Brovkin, V. (18 November 2008). "Ocean methane hydrates as a slow tipping point in the global carbon cycle". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (49): 20596–20601. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10620596A. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800885105. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2584575. PMID 19017807.
  10. ^ Lenton, T. M.; Held, H.; Kriegler, E.; Hall, J. W.; Lucht, W.; Rahmstorf, S.; Schellnhuber, H. J. (7 February 2008). "Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (6): 1786–1793. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.1786L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705414105. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2538841. PMID 18258748.
  11. ^ Connor, Steve (23 September 2008). "Exclusive: The methane time bomb - Climate Change, Environment - The Independent". Arctic scientists discover new global warming threat as melting permafrost releases millions of tons of a gas 20 times more damaging than carbon dioxide. independent.co.uk. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
  12. ^ "Methane from melting Siberian permafrost". Melting permafrost methane emissions: The other threat to climate change. TerraNature Trust. 15 September 2006. Archived from the original on 11 January 2009. Retrieved 28 December 2008.
  13. ^ ACIA (2005). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment - Scientific Report. Cambridge University Press. pp. 216–217. ISBN 978-0-521-86509-8. Archived from the original on 14 December 2007. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
  14. ^ a b Chen, Yating; Liu, Aobo; Moore, John C. (15 May 2020). "Mitigation of Arctic permafrost carbon loss through stratospheric aerosol geoengineering". Nature Communications. 11 (1). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16357-8. ISSN 2041-1723.
  15. ^ a b Caldeira, K.; Wood, L. (13 November 2008). "Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 366 (1882). The Royal Society: 4039–4056. Bibcode:2008RSPTA.366.4039C. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0132. ISSN 1364-503X. PMID 18757275.
  16. ^ Watts, Robert G. (1997). "Cryospheric processes". Engineering Response to Global Climate Change: Planning a Research and Development Agenda. CRC Press. p. 419. ISBN 978-1-56670-234-8. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
  17. ^ Rena Marie Pacella (29 June 2007). "Duct Tape Methods to Save the Earth: Re-Ice the Arctic". Popular Science. Archived from the original on 6 January 2013. Retrieved 4 March 2009.
  18. ^ "ASU team proposes restoring Arctic ice with 10 million windmills". Arizona State University. 22 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 July 2018. Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  19. ^ S. Zhou; P. C. Flynn (2005). "Geoengineering Downwelling Ocean Currents: A Cost Assessment". Climatic Change. 71 (1–2): 203–220. Bibcode:2005ClCh...71..203Z. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5933-0. S2CID 154903691.
  20. ^ a b c d e Desch, Steven J.; Smith, Nathan; Groppi, Christopher; Vargas, Perry; Jackson, Rebecca; Kalyaan, Anusha; Nguyen, Peter; Probst, Luke; Rubin, Mark E.; Singleton, Heather; Spacek, Alexander; Truitt, Amanda; Zaw, Pye Pye; Hartnett, Hilairy E. (19 December 2016). "Arctic ice management: ARCTIC ICE MANAGEMENT". Earth's Future. 5 (1): 107–127. doi:10.1002/2016EF000410.
  21. ^ a b c Zimmer, Katarina. "The daring plan to save the Arctic ice with glass". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 28 March 2023.
  22. ^ a b c d Field, L.; Ivanova, D.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Mlaker, V.; Sholtz, A.; Decca, R.; Manzara, A.; Johnson, D.; Christodoulou, E.; Walter, P.; Katuri, K. (21 May 2018). "Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering". Earth's Future. 6 (6): 882–901. doi:10.1029/2018EF000820. ISSN 2328-4277.
  23. ^ a b c d Webster, Melinda A.; Warren, Stephen G. (27 March 2023). "Regional Geoengineering Using Tiny Glass Bubbles Would Accelerate the Loss of Arctic Sea Ice". Earth's Future. 10 (10). doi:10.1029/2022EF002815. ISSN 2328-4277.
  24. ^ Schuttenhelm, Rolf (2008). "Diomede Crossroads - Saving the North Pole? Thoughts on plausibility". Archived from the original on 25 July 2011.
  25. ^ "Could a Massive Dam Between Alaska and Russia Save the Arctic?". HuffPost. 27 November 2010. Archived from the original on 26 October 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2011.

Further reading