Rotadiscus: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m WP:CHECKWIKI error 22 fixes (category with space) + general fixes (BRFA 16) using AWB (7799) |
remove cite pcm template use |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| genus = '''''Rotadiscus''''' |
| genus = '''''Rotadiscus''''' |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Rotadiscus''''' is a genus of discoidal animal known from the Cambrian [[Chengjiang biota]]<ref>{{cite doi | 10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00025-6 }}</ref> and classified with the [[eldoniid]]s.<ref name=Caron2010>{{cite |
'''''Rotadiscus''''' is a genus of discoidal animal known from the Cambrian [[Chengjiang biota]]<ref>{{cite doi | 10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00025-6 }}</ref> and classified with the [[eldoniid]]s.<ref name=Caron2010>{{cite doi|10.1371/journal.pone.0009586}}</ref> |
||
As with other eldoniids, it was originally thought to have been pelagic, but is now thought to be benthic. |
As with other eldoniids, it was originally thought to have been pelagic, but is now thought to be benthic. |
Revision as of 00:04, 12 April 2012
Rotadiscus Temporal range:
| |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
(unranked): | |
Genus: | Rotadiscus
|
Rotadiscus is a genus of discoidal animal known from the Cambrian Chengjiang biota[2] and classified with the eldoniids.[3]
As with other eldoniids, it was originally thought to have been pelagic, but is now thought to be benthic.
References
- ^ CHEN, J-Y.; M-Y. ZHU,; G. Q. ZHOU (1995). "The early Cambrian medusiform metazoan Eldonia from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 40: 213–244.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi: 10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00025-6 , please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi= 10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00025-6
instead. - ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009586, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0009586
instead.