Test of Word Reading Efficiency Second Edition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{See also|Reading|Reading comprehension}} = Test Of Word Reading Efficiency Second Edition (TOWRE - 2) = {{Infobox quality tool | name = Test Of Word Readi...'
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:10, 24 May 2019

Test Of Word Reading Efficiency Second Edition (TOWRE - 2)

Test Of Word Reading Efficiency - Second Edition (TOWRE - 2)
Reading Test
First described byJoseph K Torgesen, Richard Wagner and Carl Rashotte
PurposeTo test the reading accuracy and fluency on pronouncing printed words (Sight Word Efficiency) and Phonemically Regular Non-words (Phonemic Decoding Efficiency)

Test of Word Efficiency Second Edition or commonly known as TOWRE - 2 is a kind of reading test developed to test the efficiency of reading ability of children from age 6-24 years. It generally seeks to measure an individual's accuracy and fluency regarding two efficiencies; Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE). SWE measures ability of pronouncing words that are printed and PDE assesses the quantity of pronouncing phonemically regular non-words.[1] TOWRE - 2 is a very simple test which can be administered by teachers and aides, and it only takes five minutes to complete the procedure.[2] It is commonly used in reading research, classroom assessment and clinical practice. [3] This test is both straightforward and easy to use because it does not require a lot of materials (i.e. stopwatch, pencil, and stimulus cards) and can be administered by teachers and aides.[4]


History

Test Of Word Efficiency (TOWRE) was first developed and published by Joseph K Torgesen, Richard Wagner and Carl Rashotte in 1999.[1] After its popularity and acclamation[3], its second revision version was published in 2012 which is known as Test of Word Efficiency second edition (TOWRE - 2).[4]

In beginning, Torgesen et.al sampled 1507 children, adolescents and young adults from 30 US states to form the measurement of TOWRE. Their ages ranged from 6 to 24 years.[3] For TOWRE - 2, Torgesen et. al sampled 1,700 children ranging from 6-24 years old from 13 states of US. The TOWRE-2 mostly focused on students in elementary school (through grade 5) as this population was expected to have its widest use.[4]

There are few minor differences between TOWRE and TOWRE - 2. The first edition of TOWRE had two subtests (A and B), however this second edition has four subtests (A,B,C and D). According to the inventors of this tests, the additional tests will help to monitor the current condition of the students and how well their reading instructions are helping.[4]

Format

Generally, there are two formats of this test which helps to understand the reading accuracy of the children and their ability to do it fluently. The test uses regular and irregular words, common and less common words, vowel digraphs, and orthographic units.[2] The two sections that are used by TOWRE - 2 are:

Sight Word Efficiency (SWE)

It uses vertically printed singlet list of 104 words from one to four syllables. The individual is given 45 seconds to pronounce as much of the words as they can from the list.[5] The level of difficulty gradually increases from single syllables to multi-syllables and the administer measures how well the individual is pronouncing and how fast.[6] This process of reading real words in 45 seconds helps to measure the capability of an individual to pronounce single sight words.[4]

Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE)

This subtest is more about measuring the ability of children to recognise unfamiliar words, pseudo-words or non-words. It uses 63 pseudo-words of one to three syllables and measures the children's efficiency of reading these words. The scores on this subtests helps researchers to understand the enthusiasm of students' to learn independent reading and spelling skills. It generally starts with non-words that have less syllables and less difficult and gradually increase in both syllables and difficulty.[4]

The combined scores of these two subtests helps researchers to administer the reading abilities or disabilities of the participants. The scores in one or both of these subtests helps to diagnose the reading problems.[4]

Uses of TOWRE - 2

(3916313446)]]TOWRE - 2 can be categorised as multipurpose test as it has been used in several variety of researches and used by different category of people, such as teachers, educational researchers, physicians, speech pathologists and school psychologists. However, we can observe three main uses of TOWRE - 2 which are as follows:

Early Identification

TOWRE - 2 is a screening test which is assumed to take less than 5 minutes to be administered and get the results. Thus it is presumed to be the easiest way to test students and learn their ability to recognise the reading fluency and accuracy from the very early age.[2] Researchers believe that morphological awareness, i.e. ability to identify the structures of the words, develop from as early as 4 years old.[7] Thus, researchers have used TOWRE - 2 to identify morphological awareness in children, and also other reading abilities like reading comprehensions and passage reading efficiency.[2][3][6][7] Teachers have used this test to help diagnose the children who are not benefitting from the reading instructions they are receiving.[1]

Diagnosis of Learning disabilities

TOWRE - 2 has widely been used by researchers and teachers to examine learning disabilities in children from age 6-24 years and especially the children from elementary school. It is also used in place of standard diagnostic test of phonetic non-word reading ability, which is mostly used to diagnose learning disabilities like dyslexia.[1] When older children and accomplished young children are slow in orally reciting texts, the individual is considered to have learning disability and is referred to correct specialists. Physicians use TOWRE - 2 and similar other tests such as CTOPP (Comprehensive Test Of Phonological Processing) and Woodcock Reading Mastery Test, in the clinical setting because children do not need to bring their text book and can still have materials for the diagnosis.[8]

Researches

TOWRE was first published in 1999. However, after its publication it has been used numerous times in researches related to language, education and learning disabilities.[1] Just like its predecessor, TOWRE - 2, the second edition of TOWRE which was published in 2012, has been used by researchers, teachers and physicians.[3] TOWRE - 2 has mostly been used to measure the correlation between reading fluency and reading comprehension.[6]

Scaled Scores and Percentile

Age equivalent, grade equivalent, percentile marks and scaled scores are four of the normative scores of TOWRE - 2, however, the authors recommend to use percentile marks and scaled scores to interpret test results rather than age and grade equivalent. The two subtests, Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE), and the TWRE index score have mean of 100 and the standard deviation of 15. TWRE index integrate performances of both subtests, which is the reason why it is the most reliable test score.[4]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) | Pearson Assessment". www.pearsonclinical.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
  2. ^ a b c d Knight, Bruce Allen; Galletly, Susan A. (2006-01-01). "The Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) used in an Australian context". Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities. 11 (3): 139–145. doi:10.1080/19404150609546817. ISSN 1324-8928.
  3. ^ a b c d e Marinus, Eva; Kohnen, Saskia; McArthur, Genevieve (2013-11-01). "Australian comparison data for the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE)". Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties. 18 (2): 199–212. doi:10.1080/19404158.2013.852981. ISSN 1940-4158.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Tarar, Jessica M.; Meisinger, Elizabeth B.; Dickens, Rachel H. (2015). "Test Review: Test of Word Reading Efficiency–Second Edition (TOWRE-2) by Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A." Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 30 (4): 320–326. doi:10.1177/0829573515594334. ISSN 0829-5735.
  5. ^ Ouellette, Gene; Beers, Ashley (2010-02-01). "A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story". Reading and Writing. 23 (2): 189–208. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1. ISSN 1573-0905.
  6. ^ a b c Kim, Young-Suk; Wagner, Richard K.; Lopez, Danielle (2012). "Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 113 (1): 93–111. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.002. ISSN 0022-0965.
  7. ^ a b Kirby, John R.; Deacon, S. Hélène; Bowers, Peter N.; Izenberg, Leah; Wade-Woolley, Lesly; Parrila, Rauno (2011-03-25). "Children's morphological awareness and reading ability". Reading and Writing. 25 (2): 389–410. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5. ISSN 0922-4777.
  8. ^ Shaywitz, S. E.; Shaywitz, B. A. (2003-05-01). "Dyslexia (Specific Reading Disability)". Pediatrics in Review. 24 (5): 147–153. doi:10.1542/pir.24-5-147. ISSN 0191-9601.