William Ernest Johnson: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Work: saving "recovered unsaved changes"
→‎Work: added cite with quote from work that was likely used for some claims re Logic being dated, Johnson being 'old guard'
Line 26: Line 26:
Johnson's major publication was a three volume work ''Logic'' (1921–1924) which was based on his lectures. This may never have been published if it hadn't been for the efforts of Newnham student Naomi Bentwich (1891–1988).<ref name=":1" /> Naomi persuaded him to publish, typed and co-edited the manuscript and encouraged him to finish the project.<ref name=":1" /> The preface to the first volume carries the acknowledgement: "I have to express my great obligations to my former pupil, Miss Naomi Bentwich, without whose encouragement and valuable assistance in the composition and arrangement of the work, it would not have been produced in its present form".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=W. E.|title=Logic|date=1921|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> A fourth volume on probability was never finished, but parts of it would be published posthumously as an article in ''Mind''.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|url=https://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Johnson.html|title=William Johnson (1858-1931)|website=www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk|access-date=2019-06-21}}</ref><ref name=":1" />
Johnson's major publication was a three volume work ''Logic'' (1921–1924) which was based on his lectures. This may never have been published if it hadn't been for the efforts of Newnham student Naomi Bentwich (1891–1988).<ref name=":1" /> Naomi persuaded him to publish, typed and co-edited the manuscript and encouraged him to finish the project.<ref name=":1" /> The preface to the first volume carries the acknowledgement: "I have to express my great obligations to my former pupil, Miss Naomi Bentwich, without whose encouragement and valuable assistance in the composition and arrangement of the work, it would not have been produced in its present form".<ref>{{cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=W. E.|title=Logic|date=1921|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> A fourth volume on probability was never finished, but parts of it would be published posthumously as an article in ''Mind''.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|url=https://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Johnson.html|title=William Johnson (1858-1931)|website=www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk|access-date=2019-06-21}}</ref><ref name=":1" />


''Logic'' ensured his election to the British Academy (and won him honorary degrees from the universities of Manchester and Aberdeen)<ref name=":5" /> but by his death it appeared dated. Johnson can be seen as a member of the British logic "old guard" pushed aside by the ''[[Principia Mathematica]]'' of [[Alfred North Whitehead]] and Bertrand Russell. Yet an article entitled "The Logical Calculus" (Johnson 1892) reveals that he had nontrivial technical capabilities in his youth, and that he was significantly influenced by the formal logical work of [[Charles Sanders Peirce]]. The article begins as follows:
''Logic'' ensured his election to the British Academy (and won him honorary degrees from the universities of Manchester and Aberdeen)<ref name=":5" /> but by his death it appeared dated.<ref name=":8">{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gMdyCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA258#v=onepage&q&f=false|title=Wittgenstein’s Color Exclusion and Johnson’s Determinable|last=Gandon|first=Sébastien|work=Early Analytic Philosophy - New Perspectives on the Tradition|publisher=Springer International Publishing|others=Costreie, Sorin,|year=2016|isbn=9783319242149|location=|pages=269|oclc=936040958|quote=the book was already dated at the time of its publication. But seeing Johnson only as a member of the British logic 'old guard', pushed aside by the Principia Mathematica, would be unfair and would not give credit to the richness of his thought}}</ref> Johnson can be seen as a member of the British logic "old guard" pushed aside by the ''[[Principia Mathematica]]'' of [[Alfred North Whitehead]] and Bertrand Russell.<ref name=":8" /> Yet an article entitled "The Logical Calculus" (Johnson 1892) reveals that he had nontrivial technical capabilities in his youth, and that he was significantly influenced by the formal logical work of [[Charles Sanders Peirce]]. The article begins as follows:


<blockquote>
<blockquote>

Revision as of 16:00, 26 June 2019

W. E. Johnson, circa 1902[1]

William Ernest Johnson (23 June 1858 – 14 January 1931), usually cited as W. E. Johnson, was a British philosopher, logician and economic theorist.[2] He is mainly remembered for his 3 volume Logic (which introduced the concept of exchangeability [3][1]).

Life and career

Johnson was born in Cambridge on 23 June 1858 to William Henry Farthing Johnson and his wife, Harriet (née Brimley).[4] He was their fifth child.[4] The family were Baptists and political liberals.[5]

He attended the Llandaff House School, Cambridge where his father was the proprietor and headteacher, then the Perse School, Cambridge, and the Liverpool Royal Institution School.[4] At the age of around eight he became seriously ill and developed severe asthma and lifelong ill health. Due to this his education was frequently disrupted.[5]

In 1879 he entered King's College, Cambridge to read mathematics having won a scholarship and was placed 11th Wrangler in 1882.[6] He stayed on to study for the Moral Sciences Tripos from which he graduated in 1883 with a First Class degree.[6] He was also a Cambridge Apostle.[7]

In 1895 he married Barbara Keymer. After her sudden death in 1904 his sister Fanny moved in with him to care for his two sons.[4]

Having failed to win a prize-fellowship, he spent some time teaching mathematics. His first teaching post was as a lecturer in Psychology and Education at the Cambridge Women's Training College which he held for several years.[5] He was University Teacher of Theory of Education 1893-98 and, from 1896 until 1901, University Lecturer in Moral Sciences at the University of Cambridge.[5][6] In 1902 he was elected a Fellow of King's College, and appointed to the (newly-created) Sidgwick Lecturership, positions he held until his death.[6][4] In 1923 he was elected a Fellow of the British Academy.[6][4]

Johnson's students included I. A. Richards,[8] John Maynard Keynes, Frank Ramsey, Dorothy Wrinch,[1] C. D. Broad.[2] and R. B. Braithwaite.[5] In 1912 (at Bertrand Russell's request) Johnson also attempted to 'coach' Ludwig Wittgenstein in logic but this was an arrangement that was both brief and unsuccessful.[9]

He died in St Andrew's Hospital, Northampton, on 14 January 1931 and is buried at Grantchester, Cambridgeshire.[4]

Work

Members of the Moral Science Club circa 1913, with W. E. Johnson sat in the middle of the front row (to the right of Bertrand Russell)

Johnson had ill health and was a famous procrastinator and he therefore published little. (That Johnson, though "very able", was "lacking in vigour" and had "published almost nothing" is a matter Bertrand Russell commented upon unsympathetically in a letter to Ottoline Morrell of 23 February 1913).[10] His Times obituary reported that "his critical intellect did not readily lend itself to authorship".[11]

Johnson's major publication was a three volume work Logic (1921–1924) which was based on his lectures. This may never have been published if it hadn't been for the efforts of Newnham student Naomi Bentwich (1891–1988).[5] Naomi persuaded him to publish, typed and co-edited the manuscript and encouraged him to finish the project.[5] The preface to the first volume carries the acknowledgement: "I have to express my great obligations to my former pupil, Miss Naomi Bentwich, without whose encouragement and valuable assistance in the composition and arrangement of the work, it would not have been produced in its present form".[12] A fourth volume on probability was never finished, but parts of it would be published posthumously as an article in Mind.[13][5]

Logic ensured his election to the British Academy (and won him honorary degrees from the universities of Manchester and Aberdeen)[13] but by his death it appeared dated.[14] Johnson can be seen as a member of the British logic "old guard" pushed aside by the Principia Mathematica of Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell.[14] Yet an article entitled "The Logical Calculus" (Johnson 1892) reveals that he had nontrivial technical capabilities in his youth, and that he was significantly influenced by the formal logical work of Charles Sanders Peirce. The article begins as follows:

"As a material machine economises the exertion of force, so a symbolic calculus economises the exertion of intelligence ... the more perfect the calculus, the smaller the intelligence compared to the results."

A. N. Prior's Formal Logic cites this article several times.[15]

John Passmore tells us:

"His neologisms, as rarely happens, have won wide acceptance: such phrases as “ostensive definition”, such contrasts as those between ... “determinates” and “determinables”, “continuants” and “occurrents”, are now familiar in philosophical literature." (Passmore, 1966, p.346)[16]

Johnson also wrote three papers on economics. The first two, both published in the Cambridge Economic Club, being 1891's “Exchange and Distribution" and 1894's “On Certain Questions Connected with Demand” (the latter being co-written with C. P. Langer).[17] ‘The Pure Theory of Utility Curves’ (1913)[18] was an important paper, representing "a considerable advance in the development of utility theory".[19] Prior to the latter he would also write fourteen entries for the first edition of R. H. Inglis Palgrave's Dictionary of Political Economy (1894-1899).[17] He was also of particular influence on John Maynard Keynes[20][16][5] (and had been a colleague of his father John Neville Keynes).[5]

Selected publications

References

  1. ^ a b c Zabell, Sandy L. (1982). "W. E. Johnson's "Sufficientness" Postulate". The Annals of Statistics. 10 (4 [pp.1090–1099]): 1097, 1099. doi:10.1214/aos/1176345975. ISSN 0090-5364.
  2. ^ a b Zabell S.L. (2008) Johnson, William Ernest (1858–1931). In: Durlauf S.N., Blume L.E. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_868
  3. ^ Zabell, S. L. (1992). "Predicting the unpredictable" (PDF). Synthese. 90 (2 [pp. 205–232]): 229. doi:10.1007/BF00485351. ISSN 0039-7857.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Braithwaite, R. B. (2004). "Johnson, William Ernest (1858–1931)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/34206. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Broad, C.D. (1952). "William Ernest Johnson". In Broad, C. D. (ed.). Ethics and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge & K. Paul. pp. 94–114.
  6. ^ a b c d e "Johnson, William Ernest (JHN878WE)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
  7. ^ First semester. (2017). In P. Bogaard & J. Bell (Eds.), The Harvard Lectures of Alfred North Whitehead, 1924-1925: Philosophical Presuppositions of Science (fn.5. p. 493). Edinburgh University Press.
  8. ^ Russo, John Paul (2015). I.A. Richards: His Life and Work. London: Routledge. p. 46. ISBN 9781138842717. OCLC 898154256. ...Richards' supervisor in moral science for his "last two years, nearly" .... W. E. Johnson ... was important "not so much for any one thing, but in the general intellectual rigor and imagination brought to bear upon issues." He was a "quiet, gentle man" who suffered badly from asthma. When Richards went to King's for supervision he would often find him lying in bed and would take notes from a man "quietly delivering monologues." Compared with McTaggart ... Johnson was "more judicious, more balanced, more interested in trying to say and restate what others thought. McTaggart was ... always trying to push his theories..." ... Johnson's were "lessons in intellectual integrity."
  9. ^ Monk, Ray. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Vintage. p. 42. ISBN 0099883708. OCLC 877368486. On 1 February 1912 Wittgenstein was admitted as a member of Trinity College, with Russell as his supervisor. Knowing that he had never received any formal tuition in logic, and feeling that he might benefit from it, Russell arranged for him to be 'coached' by the eminent logician and Fellow of King's College, W. E. Johnson. The arrangement lasted only a few weeks. Wittgenstein later told F. R. Leavis: 'I found in the first hour that he had nothing to teach me.' ... Leavis was also told by Johnson: 'At our first meeting he was teaching me.' ... The difference is that Johnson's remark was sardonic, Wittgenstein's completely in earnest. It was actually Johnson who put an end to the arrangement ...
  10. ^ Russell, Bertrand, 1872-1970. (2002). The selected letters of Bertrand Russell. The private years, 1884-1914. Griffin, Nicholas. London: Routledge. pp. 433–434. ISBN 0415260140. OCLC 49594254. W. E. Johnson ... is very able, but lacking in vigour, and has published almost nothing. His family make a cult of him, and talk as if having the ideas were everything, and writing them out a mere vulgar mechanical labour. It vexes me, because anybody who has ever written knows the intolerable labour of getting one's ideas into proper shape, long after they have seemed all right as mere thoughts. Universities are full of people who ought to write and don't — I always feel annoyed with them, and with people who minimize the labour of actually producing something.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ W. E. JOHNSON, The Times, 15 January 1931. Reprinted in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes (1978) pp. 349–350 doi:10.1017/upo9781139524230.037
  12. ^ Johnson, W. E. (1921). Logic. Cambridge University Press.
  13. ^ a b "William Johnson (1858-1931)". www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
  14. ^ a b Gandon, Sébastien (2016). Wittgenstein’s Color Exclusion and Johnson’s Determinable. Costreie, Sorin,. Springer International Publishing. p. 269. ISBN 9783319242149. OCLC 936040958. the book was already dated at the time of its publication. But seeing Johnson only as a member of the British logic 'old guard', pushed aside by the Principia Mathematica, would be unfair and would not give credit to the richness of his thought {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  15. ^ Prior, A. N. (1949). "Determinables, Determinates and Determinants". Mind. 58 (229): 1–20. doi:10.1093/mind/lviii.229.1. JSTOR 2254522.
  16. ^ a b Passmore, John (1966). A Hundred Years of Philosophy. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd. pp. 135–136, 343–346.
  17. ^ a b Moscati, Ivan (2005). "W. E. Johnson's 1913 Paper and the Question of his Knowledge of Pareto" (PDF). Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 27 (3): 283–304. doi:10.1080/09557570500183553. ISSN 1469-9656.
  18. ^ Johnson, W. E. (1913). "The Pure Theory of Utility Curves". The Economic Journal. 23 (92): 483–513. doi:10.2307/2221661. JSTOR 2221661.
  19. ^ Baumol, W. J.; Goldfeld, S.N., eds. (1968). Precursors in Mathematical Economics: An Anthology. London School of Economics and Political Science. p. 96.
  20. ^ "Johnson, William Ernest." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. via Encyclopedia.com. 21 Jun. 2019

External links