Seiberg–Witten theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 4: Line 4:


==Seiberg–Witten curves==
==Seiberg–Witten curves==
In general, effective Lagrangians of supersymmetric gauge theories are largely determined by their holomorphic properties and their behavior near the singularities. In particular, in [[gauge theory]] with <math>N = 2</math> [[extended supersymmetry]], the moduli space of vacua is a special [[Kähler manifold]] and its Kähler potential is constrained by above conditions.
In general, effective Lagrangians of supersymmetric gauge theories are largely determined by their holomorphic properties and their behavior near the singularities. In particular, in [[gauge theory]] with <math>\mathcal{N} = 2</math> [[extended supersymmetry]], the moduli space of vacua is a special [[Kähler manifold]] and its Kähler potential is constrained by above conditions.


In the original approach<ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = hep-th/9407087|doi = 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90124-4|title = Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory|year = 1994|last1 = Seiberg|first1 = Nathan|last2 = Witten|first2 = Edward|journal = Nucl. Phys. B|volume = 426|pages = 19--52}}</ref>, <ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = hep-th/9408099|doi = 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90214-3|title = Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD|year = 1994|last1 = Seiberg|first1 = Nathan|last2 = Witten|first2 = Edward|journal = Nucl. Phys. B|volume = 431|pages = 484--550}}</ref> by [[Nathan Seiberg| Seiberg]] and [[Edward Witten| Witten]], holomorphy and electric-magnetic duality constraints are strong enough to almost uniquely
In the original derivation by [[Nathan Seiberg]] and [[Edward Witten]], they extensively used holomorphy and electric-magnetic duality
to constrain the prepotential, namely the metric of the moduli space of vacua.
constrain the prepotential, and therefore the metric of the moduli space of vacua, for theories with <math>SU(2)</math> gauge group.
Consider the example with gauge group SU(n). The classical potential is
More generally, consider the example with gauge group SU(n). The classical potential is


{{NumBlk|:|<math>V(x) = \frac{1}{g^2} \operatorname{Tr} [\phi , \bar{\phi} ]^2 \,</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}}
{{NumBlk|:|<math>V(x) = \frac{1}{g^2} \operatorname{Tr} [\phi , \bar{\phi} ]^2 \,</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}}


This must vanish on the moduli space, so vacuum expectation value of &phi; can be gauge rotated into Cartan subalgebra, so it is a traceless diagonal complex matrix.
This vanishes on the moduli space, so the vacuum expectation value of <math>\phi</math> can be gauge rotated into Cartan subalgebra, making it a traceless diagonal complex matrix <math>a</math>.


Because the fields <math>\phi</math> no longer have vanishing [[vacuum expectation value]]. Because these are now heavy due to the Higgs effect, they should be integrated out in order to find the effective <math>N = 2</math> Abelian gauge theory. This can be expressed in terms of a single holomorphic function F.
Because the fields <math>\phi</math> no longer have vanishing [[vacuum expectation value]], other fields become heavy due to the Higgs effect. They are integrated out in order to find the effective <math>\mathcal{N} = 2</math> Abelian gauge theory. Its two-derivative, four-fermions low-energy action can be expressed in terms of a single holomorphic function <math>\mathcal{F}</math>, as follows:


{{NumBlk|:| <math>\frac{1}{4\pi} \operatorname{Im} \Bigl[ \int d^4 \theta \frac{d\mathcal{F}}{dA} \bar{A} + \int d^2 \theta \frac{1}{2} \frac{d^2 \mathcal{F}}{dA^2} W_\alpha W^\alpha \Bigr] \,</math>|{{EquationRef|3}}}}
In terms of this prepotential the Lagrangian can be written in the form:


{{NumBlk|:| <math>\frac{1}{4\pi} \operatorname{Im} \Bigl[ \int d^4 \theta \frac{dF}{dA} \bar{A} + \int d^2 \theta \frac{1}{2} \frac{d^2 F}{dA^2} W_\alpha W^\alpha \Bigr] \,</math>|{{EquationRef|3}}}}
{{NumBlk|:|<math>\mathcal{F} = \frac{i}{2\pi} \mathcal{A}^2 \operatorname{\ln}\frac{\mathcal{A}^2}{\Lambda^2} + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \mathcal{F}_k \frac{\Lambda^{4k}}{\mathcal{A}^{4k}} \mathcal{A}^2 \,</math>|{{EquationRef|4}}}}


The first term is a perturbative loop calculation and the second is the [[Instanton#4d supersymmetric gauge theories|instanton]] part where k labels fixed instanton numbers. In theories whose gauge groups are products of unitary groups, <math>\mathcal{F}</math> can be computed exactly, using localization<ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = hep-th/0206161|doi = 10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4|title = Seiberg-Witten Prepotential from Instanton Counting|year = 2002|last1 = Nekrasov|first1 = Nikita|journal = Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics|volume = 7|number = 5|pages = 831 – 864}}</ref>, and the limit shape techniques <ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = hep-th/0306238|doi = 10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_15|title = Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions|year = 2003|last1 = Nekrasov|first1 = Nikita|last2 = Okounkov|first2 = Andrei| journal = Prog.Math.|volume = 244|pages = 525--596}}</ref>.
{{NumBlk|:|<math>F = \frac{i}{2\pi} \mathcal{A}^2 \operatorname{\ln}\frac{\mathcal{A}^2}{\Lambda^2} + \sum_{k=1}^\infty F_k \frac{\Lambda^{4k}}{\mathcal{A}^{4k}} \mathcal{A}^2 \,</math>|{{EquationRef|4}}}}


From <math>\mathcal{F}</math> we can get the mass of the [[Bogomol'nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield bound#Supersymmetry|BPS]] particles.
The first term is a perturbative loop calculation and the second is the [[Instanton#4d supersymmetric gauge theories|instanton]] part where k labels fixed instanton numbers.

From this we can get the mass of the [[Bogomol'nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield bound#Supersymmetry|BPS]] particles.


{{NumBlk|:|<math>M \approx |na+ma_D| \,</math>|{{EquationRef|5}}}}
{{NumBlk|:|<math>M \approx |na+ma_D| \,</math>|{{EquationRef|5}}}}
{{NumBlk|:|<math> a_D = \frac{dF}{da} \,</math>|{{EquationRef|6}}}}
{{NumBlk|:|<math> a_D = \frac{d\mathcal{F}}{da} \,</math>|{{EquationRef|6}}}}


One way to interpret this is that these variables a and its dual can be expressed as [[Period mapping#The case of elliptic curves|periods]] of a meromorphic differential on a Riemann surface called the Seiberg–Witten curve.
One way to interpret this is that these variables <math>a</math> and its dual can be expressed as [[Period mapping#The case of elliptic curves|periods]] of a meromorphic differential on a Riemann surface called the Seiberg–Witten curve.


==Relation to integrable systems==
==Relation to integrable systems==

Revision as of 01:14, 2 July 2020

In theoretical physics, Seiberg–Witten theory is a theory that determines an exact low-energy effective action (for massless degrees of freedom) of a supersymmetric gauge theory—namely the metric of the moduli space of vacua.

Seiberg–Witten curves

In general, effective Lagrangians of supersymmetric gauge theories are largely determined by their holomorphic properties and their behavior near the singularities. In particular, in gauge theory with extended supersymmetry, the moduli space of vacua is a special Kähler manifold and its Kähler potential is constrained by above conditions.

In the original approach[1], [2] by Seiberg and Witten, holomorphy and electric-magnetic duality constraints are strong enough to almost uniquely constrain the prepotential, and therefore the metric of the moduli space of vacua, for theories with gauge group.

More generally, consider the example with gauge group SU(n). The classical potential is

(1)

This vanishes on the moduli space, so the vacuum expectation value of can be gauge rotated into Cartan subalgebra, making it a traceless diagonal complex matrix .

Because the fields no longer have vanishing vacuum expectation value, other fields become heavy due to the Higgs effect. They are integrated out in order to find the effective Abelian gauge theory. Its two-derivative, four-fermions low-energy action can be expressed in terms of a single holomorphic function , as follows:

(3)

(4)

The first term is a perturbative loop calculation and the second is the instanton part where k labels fixed instanton numbers. In theories whose gauge groups are products of unitary groups, can be computed exactly, using localization[3], and the limit shape techniques [4].

From we can get the mass of the BPS particles.

(5)

(6)

One way to interpret this is that these variables and its dual can be expressed as periods of a meromorphic differential on a Riemann surface called the Seiberg–Witten curve.

Relation to integrable systems

The special Kähler geometry on the moduli space of vacua in Seiberg–Witten theory can be identified with the geometry of the base of complex completely integrable system. The total phase of this complex completely integrable system can be identified with the moduli space of vacua of the 4d theory compactified on a circle. See Hitchin system.

Seiberg–Witten prepotential via instanton counting

In the localization approach[5] of Nikita Nekrasov, the Seiberg-Witten prepotential arises in the flat space limit , , of the partition function of the theory subject to the so-called -background. The latter is a specific background of four dimensional supergravity. It can be engineered, formally by lifting the super Yang–Mills theory to six dimensions, then compactifying on 2-torus, while twisting the four dimensional spacetime around the two non-contractible cycles. In addition, one twists fermions so as to produce covariantly constant spinors generating unbroken supersymmetries. The two parameters , of the -background correspond to the angles of the spacetime rotation.

In Ω-background, we can integrate out all the non-zero modes, so the path integral with the boundary condition at can be expressed as a sum over instanton number of the products and ratios of fermionic and bosonic determinants, producing the so-called Nekrasov partition function. In the limit where , approach 0, this sum is dominated by a unique saddle point. On the other hand, when , approach 0,

(10)

holds.

See also

References

  • Jost, Jürgen (2002). Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-42627-2. (See Section 7.2)

External links

  1. ^ Seiberg, Nathan; Witten, Edward (1994). "Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory". Nucl. Phys. B. 426: 19--52. arXiv:hep-th/9407087. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90124-4.
  2. ^ Seiberg, Nathan; Witten, Edward (1994). "Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD". Nucl. Phys. B. 431: 484--550. arXiv:hep-th/9408099. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90214-3.
  3. ^ Nekrasov, Nikita (2002). "Seiberg-Witten Prepotential from Instanton Counting". Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. 7 (5): 831–864. arXiv:hep-th/0206161. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4.
  4. ^ Nekrasov, Nikita; Okounkov, Andrei (2003). "Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions". Prog.Math. 244: 525--596. arXiv:hep-th/0306238. doi:10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_15.
  5. ^ Nekrasov, Nikita (2002). "Seiberg-Witten Prepotential from Instanton Counting". Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. 7 (5): 831–864. arXiv:hep-th/0206161. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4.