Irrationalism: Difference between revisions
m Oeqtte moved page Irrationalism to Criticism of rationalism: More neutral designation of philosophies that are critical of rationalism. |
Cleaned up slightly. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description| |
{{short description|critical views of rationalist philosophy}} |
||
'''Irrationalism''' was an ambiguously-defined<ref name=":0"/> philosophical movement of the 19th and early-20th centuries,<ref name=":1">{{cite encyclopedia|entry=Irrationalism|last=Duignan|first=Brian|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2019-09-05|url-status=live|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/irrationalism}}</ref> in that it is a [[pejorative]] characterisation of various critiques of [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment philosophy]].<ref name=":0">{{cite encyclopedia|entry=Irrationalism|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Philosophy|publisher=Macmillan Library Reference|publication-date=2005|edition=2nd}}</ref> In this sense, irrationalism generally entails the view that certain things are beyond rational understanding, that total [[rationality]] is insufficient to human life, or that people are not instinctively rational and [[progress]]ive.<ref name=":0"/><ref name=":1"/> Such philosophies instead emphasise a person's instinct, feeling, or [[will (philosophy)|will]] as a more central element than rationality.<ref name=":1"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/irrationalisme|title=Irrationalisme|last=|first=|date=|website=CNRTL|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2019-09-05}}</ref> |
|||
The philosophy of [[rationalism]], understood as having first emerged in the writings of [[Francis Bacon]] and [[René Descartes]], has received a variety of criticisms since its inception.<ref name=":0">{{cite book|editor1-last=Callahan|editor1-first=Gene|editor2-last=McIntyre|editor2-first=Kenneth B.|chapter=Introduction|title=Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism|location=Cham|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|series=Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism|isbn=978-3-030-42598-2|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-42599-9|page=1}}</ref> These may entail a view that certain things are beyond rational understanding, that total [[rationality]] is insufficient to human life, or that people are not instinctively rational and [[progress]]ive.<ref name=":1">{{cite encyclopedia|entry=Irrationalism|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Philosophy|publisher=Macmillan Library Reference|publication-date=2005|edition=2nd}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite encyclopedia|entry=Irrationalism|last=Duignan|first=Brian|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en|access-date=2019-09-05|url-status=live|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/irrationalism}}</ref> |
|||
The term ''irrationalism'' is a [[pejorative]] designation of such criticisms.<ref name=":1"/> While irrationalism is in this sense generally understood as an ambiguously-defined<ref name=":1"/> philosophical movement of the 19th and early-20th centuries,<ref name=":2"/> such criticisms "do not share a philosophical tradition as much as a skeptical disposition toward the notion, common among modern thinkers, that there is only one standard of rationality or reasonableness, and that that one standard is or ought to be taken from the presuppositions, methods, and logic of the natural sciences."<ref name=":0"/> |
|||
[[Ontology|Ontological]] irrationalism, a position adopted by [[Arthur Schopenhauer]], describes the world as not organized in a rational way. Since humans are born as bodies-manifestations of an irrational striving for meaning, they are vulnerable to pain and suffering.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M8kaBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT73|title=Schopenhauer and Adorno on Bodily Suffering: A Comparative Analysis|last=Peters|first=M.|date=2014-12-03|publisher=Springer|isbn=9781137412171|language=en}}</ref> |
[[Ontology|Ontological]] irrationalism, a position adopted by [[Arthur Schopenhauer]], describes the world as not organized in a rational way. Since humans are born as bodies-manifestations of an irrational striving for meaning, they are vulnerable to pain and suffering.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M8kaBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT73|title=Schopenhauer and Adorno on Bodily Suffering: A Comparative Analysis|last=Peters|first=M.|date=2014-12-03|publisher=Springer|isbn=9781137412171|language=en}}</ref> |
||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
{{philosophy-stub}} |
|||
[[Category:20th-century philosophy]] |
|||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Criticisms]] |
||
[[Category:Philosophical movements]] |
|||
Revision as of 04:25, 6 December 2020
The philosophy of rationalism, understood as having first emerged in the writings of Francis Bacon and René Descartes, has received a variety of criticisms since its inception.[1] These may entail a view that certain things are beyond rational understanding, that total rationality is insufficient to human life, or that people are not instinctively rational and progressive.[2][3]
The term irrationalism is a pejorative designation of such criticisms.[2] While irrationalism is in this sense generally understood as an ambiguously-defined[2] philosophical movement of the 19th and early-20th centuries,[3] such criticisms "do not share a philosophical tradition as much as a skeptical disposition toward the notion, common among modern thinkers, that there is only one standard of rationality or reasonableness, and that that one standard is or ought to be taken from the presuppositions, methods, and logic of the natural sciences."[1]
Ontological irrationalism, a position adopted by Arthur Schopenhauer, describes the world as not organized in a rational way. Since humans are born as bodies-manifestations of an irrational striving for meaning, they are vulnerable to pain and suffering.[4]
Oswald Spengler argued that the materialist vision of Karl Marx was based on nineteenth-century science, while the twentieth century would be the age of psychology:[5]
"We no longer believe in the power of reason over life. We feel that it is life which dominates reason."
— Oswald Spengler. Politische Schriften, 1932.[6]
History
György Lukács believed that the first period of irrationalism arose with Schelling and Kierkegaard, in a fight against the dialectical concept of progress embraced by German idealism.[7]
References
- ^ a b Callahan, Gene; McIntyre, Kenneth B. (eds.). "Introduction". Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 1. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42599-9. ISBN 978-3-030-42598-2.
- ^ a b c "Irrationalism". Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2nd ed.). Macmillan Library Reference. 2005.
- ^ a b Duignan, Brian. "Irrationalism". https://www.britannica.com/topic/irrationalism. Retrieved 2019-09-05.
{{cite encyclopedia}}:|website=ignored (help); Missing or empty|title=(help)CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Peters, M. (2014-12-03). Schopenhauer and Adorno on Bodily Suffering: A Comparative Analysis. Springer. ISBN 9781137412171.
- ^ Woods, Roger (1996-03-25). The Conservative Revolution in the Weimar Republic. Springer. p. 66. ISBN 9780230375857.
- ^ Spengler, Oswald (1932). Politische Schriften. Volksausgabe. pp. 83–86.
- ^ Rockmore, I. (2012-12-06). Lukács Today: Essays in Marxist Philosophy. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 5. ISBN 9789400928978.
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |