2-category

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In category theory, a 2-category is a category with "morphisms between morphisms"; that is, where each hom set itself carries the structure of a category. It can be formally defined as a category enriched over Cat (the category of categories and functors, with the monoidal structure given by product of categories).

Contents

[edit] Definition

A 2-category C consists of:

  • A class of 0-cells (or objects) A, B, ....
  • For all objects A and B, a category \mathbf{C}(A,B). The objects f:A\to B of this category are called 1-cells and its morphisms \alpha:f\Rightarrow g are called 2-cells; the composition in this category is usually written \circ or \circ_1 and called vertical composition or composition along a 1-cell.
  • For any object A there is a functor from the terminal category (with one object and one arrow) to \mathbf{C}(A,A), that picks out the identity 1-cell idA on A and its identity 2-cell ididA. In practice these two are often denoted simply by A.
  • For all objects A, B and C, there is a functor \circ_0 : \mathbf{C}(B,C)\times\mathbf{C}(A,B)\to\mathbf{C}(A,C), called horizontal composition or composition along a 0-cell, which is associative and admits the identity 2-cells of idA as identities. The composition symbol \circ_0 is often omitted, the horizontal composite of 2-cells \alpha:f\Rightarrow g:A\to B and \beta:f'\Rightarrow g':B\to C being written simply as \beta\alpha:f'f\Rightarrow g'g:A\to C.

The notion of 2-category differs from the more general notion of a bicategory in that composition of (1-)morphisms is required to be strictly associative, whereas in a bicategory it need only be associative up to a 2-isomorphism. The axioms of a 2-category are consequences of their definition as Cat-enriched categories:

  • Vertical composition is associative and unital, the units being the identity 2-cells idf.
  • Horizontal composition is also (strictly) associative and unital, the units being the identity 2-cells A = ididA on the identity 1-cells idA.
  • The interchange law holds; i.e. it is true that for composable 2-cells α,β,γ,δ
(\alpha\circ_0\beta)\circ_1(\gamma\circ_0\delta) = (\alpha\circ_1\gamma)\circ_0(\beta\circ_1\delta)

The interchange law follows from the fact that \circ_0 is a functor between hom categories. It can be drawn as a pasting diagram as follows:

Interchange-Law.png

Here the left-hand diagram denotes the vertical composition of horizontal composites, the right-hand diagram denotes the horizontal composition of vertical composites, and the diagram in the centre is the customary representation of both.

[edit] Doctrines

In mathematics, a doctrine is simply a 2-category which is heuristically regarded as a system of theories. For example, algebraic theories, as invented by Lawvere, is an example of a doctrine, as are multi-sorted theories, operads, categories, and toposes.

The objects of the 2-category are called theories, the 1-morphisms f\colon A\rightarrow B are called models of the A in B, and the 2-morphisms are called morphisms between models.

The distinction between a 2-category and a doctrine is really only heuristic: one does not typically consider a 2-category to be populated by theories as objects and models as morphisms. It is this vocabulary that makes the theory of doctrines worth while.

For example, the 2-category Cat of categories, functors, and natural transformations is a doctrine. One sees immediately that all presheaf categories are categories of models.

As another example, one may take the subcategory of Cat consisting only of product-preserving functors as 1-morphisms. This is the doctrine of multi-sorted algebraic theories. If one only wanted 1-sorted algebraic theories, one would restrict the objects to only those categories that are generated under products by a single object.

Doctrines were invented by J. M. Beck.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  • Generalised algebraic models, by Claudia Centazzo.
Languages