Jump to content

Apis andreniformis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Iridescent (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 1 July 2016 (Typo fixing, typo(s) fixed: between 1 to → between 1 and, et. al. → et al. using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Apis andreniformis
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Hymenoptera
Suborder:
Apocrita
Family:
Apidae
Genus:
Apis
Subgenus:
Micrapis
Species:
A. andreniformis
Binomial name
Apis andreniformis
F. Smith, 1858
Map showing the range of Apis andreniformis
Range of Apis andreniformis

Apis andreniformis or the black dwarf honey bee is a relatively rare species of honey bee whose native habitat is the tropical and subtropical regions of southeast Asia.[1]

A. andreniformis was the fifth honey bee species to be described of the seven known species of Apis.[1] Until recently, however, the actual identity of the species was poorly understood. It was not recognized as its own species, but was instead considered to be a part of the species Apis florea.[1] Recent studies have highlighted notable differences between the bees and have thus separated them into distinct species.[1]

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Apis andreniformis is a part of the family Apidae, which includes honey, cuckoo, carpenter, digger, bumble, and stingless bees.[2] The genus Apis includes honey bees, the most common being Apis mellifera, otherwise known as the Western honey bee. A. andreniformis is most closely related to Apis florea, its sister species with which it is commonly seen in sympatric distribution throughout southeast Asia.[3]

Description and identification

Physical Characteristics

A. andreniformis can be distinguished from other Apis species by noting their dark black coloration, making them the darkest of their genus.[4] Originally, it was thought that A. andreniformis was a part of the species A. florea, but recent studies have noted morphological differences that have separated the two. Some distinctions include: structural differences in the endophalli, a larger wing venation in A. andrenifromis, and a longer basitarsal extension in A. florea.[5] Additionally, there are slight color variations between the two species. In A. andreniformis, its first two abdominal segments are black and its scutellum is yellow. In A. florea, the abdominal segments are reddish brown and their scutellum is black.[6] Another distinguishing factor is the presence of black hairs on the tibia of A. andreniformis, which are white in A. florea.[4]

Other differentiating characteristics include cubital indexes and proboscis length. A. andreniformis has an index of 6.37, while A. florea has one of 2.86. The proboscis of A. andreniformis has a length of 2.80 mm, while that of A. florea is 3.27 mm.[7]

Within the species, queens can be distinguished from workers and drones by their near entire black coloration.[4] In contrast, worker bees have lighter, almost yellow scutellums, as described previously.[4]

Nest Structure

A. andreniformis nests are made of a single comb found hanging from small twigs[8] in quiet forests, generally in darker areas where there is 25 to 30% of normal sunlight. This type of nest is called an open-air nest.[9] They are commonly found hanging in small trees, shrubs, or bushes are usually hidden behind leaves or branches to avoid detection.[8] They are usually built between 1 and 15 meters from the ground, though the average altitude is 2.5 m. The honeycomb typically ranges from 70 to 90 mm in size. This nest is distinct from other Apis species, like A. mellifera, who build their nests inside of cavities.[9] This open-air structure—found also in A. florea, A. dorsata, and A. laboriosa—along with a relatively flat line of nectar cells along the top, creates a plateau above the nest that can be used as a stage for their communication method known as the waggle dance.[9]

While creating the nest, plant resin is placed along the supporting branch and around the edges of the nest. This acts as a barrier against small insects, like ants, that may try to enter the nest.[10] The major location of honey storage can be found in the area above and surrounding the branch.[8] The entire area below the honey storage and branch is the brood area, where larva development occurs.[8] Along the top of the brood area is the location of pollen storage.[8] Drone development occurs in the cells toward the bottom of the nest, while queen cells can be found protruding vertically.[8]

Distribution and habitat

A. andreniformis is found in southeast Asia, specifically southern China, India, Burma, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines.[3][4] They are commonly found in sympatric distribution with A. florea.[6] Although they are sympatrically distributed, it is uncommon to have nests of different species in the same tree or bush.[10] Each species tends to be found closer to nests of its own species rather than its sister species.[10] A. andreniformis is considered a lowland species because they are most commonly found in elevations below 1,000 m,[10] although they may migrate to higher elevations during rainy seasons.[11] Similarly, they are found in tropical and subtropical regions, while cavity-dwelling honey bees can be found in colder climates.[3]

Behavior

Queen determination

Queens are not genetically determined so any young female larva can become either a worker or a queen.[10] In order to create a queen cell, royal jelly must be placed on the female larva.[10] In cases of an unexpected loss of a queen, royal jelly can be applied to any female worker to create a new emergency queen.[10] Although emergency queen rearing is possible, most often, the loss of a queen results in the dispersal of a colony.[10] If a queen becomes separated from her hive, the workers will leave the nest to search for her. Finding and joining a queen is an innate response for workers. The workers' strong attraction to queens is seen when a queen is lost, after a hive disruption by a predator, and during colony migration.[12]

Queenless and interspecific colonies

In an Apis andrenformis queenright colony, worker policing occurs, which prevents workers from laying their own eggs and helps maintain the dominance hierarchy.[13] After the loss of a queen, workers will first try to rear a new queen using royal jelly.[10] If this fails, worker policing will decrease and workers will activate their ovaries in order to rear more drones before the colony dies.[13] It is also possible for queenless colonies to adopt a queen from a related species, specifically Apis florea.[12] This may suggest that worker bees of A. andreniformis are attracted to queen bee pheromones, even those belonging to other species in the same genera.[14] Once inside the colony of A. florea, the non-natal workers of A. andreniformis may attempt to lay their own eggs in order to continue propagating their species, an action known as reproductive parasitism.[13] In a study conducted by Sitthipong Wongvilas et al., they found that most eggs laid by the non-natal A. andreniformis were policed by the queenright workers of the A. florea colony.[13] Although they adopted A. andreniformis workers in the hive, A. florea workers policed non-natal larva, thereby preventing interspecies parasitism.[13] Queenright colonies of A. andreniformis have also been observed to adopt queenless workers of A. florea as well, but their policing on non-natal larva has not yet been studied.[13]

Dominance Hierarchy

Unlike cavity-dwelling honey bees whose queen has a distinct chemical signal from that of the worker bees, A. andreniformis queens have similar chemical signals as their workers.[15] Chemical signals secreted from the mandibular gland in A. andreniformis are not caste-determining like it is in other honey bees.[15] As stated previously, the presence of royal jelly on young female larva produced the queen bee.[10] Drones, or male bees, are not used for pollination or honey production, but are instead use only to mate with the queen.

Communication

Different types of honey bees may use different types of dances to communicate with their hive. Most cavity-dwelling species use vertical waggle dances, while open-air nesters do not perform a gravity oriented waggle dance and instead perform a horizontal dance.[9] The shape of the nest creates a platform above the nest that can be used as a stage for communication.[9] The dance is a straight run pointing directly to the source of pollen or nectar that the forager has visited. Since the dance of other Apis species is vertical, it is not actually directed towards the food source, as it is in A. andreniformis.

Mating behavior

Queens of A. andreniformis commonly engage in polyandry, where the queen will mate with multiple drones, usually about 10-20 times in total.[16] Due to the large amount of mating, queens must expel any excess semen.[16] Excessive mating puts females at increased risk to predation since it must occur during flight and outside the nest in the open air. She is also at risk for sexually transmitted diseases and injury from unexpected inclement weather.[16] Some Apis males put a "mating sign" in the sting chamber of the queen that she is unable to remove. This prevents her from avoiding unwanted copulation with other drones. In contrast, this sign is not found in A. andreniformis, suggesting that queens have control over the number of mates they copulate with.[16] Although there is a lot of risk to the queen, benefits may arise from the increased genetic diversity within the colony. Genetic diversity can lead to increased resistance to disease and illnesses.[16]

Kin Selection

In studies, A. andreniformis has shown a lack of recognition for its own species and nestmates.[11] This has been shown in studies where queenless colonies of A. florea have joined the colony of A. andreniformis without facing aggression upon their initial arrival.[11][12] Similarly, queenless colonies of A. andreniformis have been seen to join A. florea colonies, but in these cases, any A. andreniformis larva are usually destroyed by the host colony, preventing parasitism from the foreign species.[12] Worker bees of A. florea have complete reproductive dominance over A. Andreniformis in a queenless nest because they have recognition and kin selection, while A. Andreniformis does not. However, when a queen is present, worker bees do not reproduce and parasitism is turned off.[13]

Parasites

The main parasites of both A. andreniformis and A. florea belong to genus Euvarroa. However, A. andreniformis is attacked by the species Euvarroa wongsirii, while Euvarroa sinhai preys on A. florea and imported colonies of Apis mellifera. The two species of Euvarroa have morphological and biological differences: while E. wongsirii has a triangular body shape and a length of 47 to 54 micrometres, E. sinhai has a more circular shape and a length of 39 to 40 micrometres.

Human Importance

Honey bees, as a whole, tend to provide many useful products for human consumption. For A. andreniformis specifically, some commercial products include royal jelly, wax, honey, and bee venoms.[4] Additionally, they are important for the pollination of flowers and plants.[4]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Hepburn, H. Randall; Radloff, Sarah E. (2011-04-13). "Biogeography of the dwarf honeybees, Apis andreniformis and Apis florea". Apidologie. 42 (3): 293–300. doi:10.1007/s13592-011-0024-x. ISSN 0044-8435.
  2. ^ "Family Apidae - Cuckoo, Carpenter, Digger, Bumble, and Honey Bees - BugGuide.Net". bugguide.net. Retrieved 2015-09-27.
  3. ^ a b c Hepburn, H. Randall; Radloff, Sarah E. (2011-04-13). "Biogeography of the dwarf honeybees, Apis andreniformis and Apis florea". Apidologie. 42 (3): 293–300. doi:10.1007/s13592-011-0024-x. ISSN 0044-8435.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Rattanawannee, Atsalek; Chanchao, Chanpen; Wongsiri, Siriwat (2007-12-01). "Morphometric and genetic variation of small dwarf honeybees Apis andreniformis Smith, 1858 in Thailand". Insect Science. 14 (6): 451–460. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7917.2007.00173.x. ISSN 1744-7917.
  5. ^ Wongisiri, S; et al. (29 September 1989). "Evidence of reproductive isolation confirms that Apis andreniformis (Smith, 1858) is a separate species from sympatric Apis florea (Fabricius, 1787)". Apidologie. 21: 47–52. doi:10.1051/apido:19900106. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  6. ^ a b Higgs, Jessica S.; Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Wandee; Oldroyd, Benjamin P. (2009-07-01). "A scientific note on a genetically-determined color morph of the dwarf honey bee, Apis andreniformis". Apidologie. 40 (4): 513–514. doi:10.1051/apido/2009010. ISSN 0044-8435.
  7. ^ Wongsiri, S.; Lekprayoon, C.; Thapa, R.; Thirakupt, K.; Rinderer, T. E.; Sylvester, H. A.; Oldroyd, B. P.; Booncham, U. (1997-01-01). "Comparative biology of Apis andreniformis and Apis florea in Thailand". Bee World. 78 (1): 23–35. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1997.11099328. ISSN 0005-772X.
  8. ^ a b c d e f Rinderer, Thomas; et al. (19 March 1996). "Comparative nest architecture of the dwarf honey bees". Journal of Apicultural Research. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  9. ^ a b c d e Raffiudin, Rika; Crozier, Ross H. (2007-05-01). "Phylogenetic analysis of honey bee behavioral evolution". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 43 (2): 543–552. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.10.013.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Honeybees of Asia - Springer. 2011-01-01. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16422-4.
  11. ^ a b c Breed, Michael D.; Deng, Xiao-Bao; Buchwald, Robert (2007-09-01). "Comparative nestmate recognition in Asian honey bees, Apis florea, Apis andreniformis, Apis dorsata, and Apis cerana". Apidologie. 38 (5): 411–418. doi:10.1051/apido:2007025. ISSN 0044-8435.
  12. ^ a b c d Wongvilas, S.; Deowanish, S.; Lim, J.; Xie, V. R. D.; Griffith, O. W.; Oldroyd, B. P. (2010-02-27). "Interspecific and conspecific colony mergers in the dwarf honey bees Apis andreniformis and A. florea". Insectes Sociaux. 57 (3): 251–255. doi:10.1007/s00040-010-0080-7. ISSN 0020-1812.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g Wongvilas, Sitthipong; Higgs, Jessica S.; Beekman, Madeleine; Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Wandee; Deowanish, Sureerat; Oldroyd, Benjamin P. (2010-03-03). "Lack of interspecific parasitism between the dwarf honeybees Apis andreniformis and Apis florea". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 64 (7): 1165–1170. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0932-1. ISSN 0340-5443.
  14. ^ Wongvilas, S.; S. Deowanish; J. Lim; V. R. D. Xie; O. W. Griffith; B. P. Oldroyd (August 2010). "Interspecific and conspecific colony mergers in the dwarf honey bees Apis andreniformis and A. florea". Insectes Sociaux. 57 (3): 251–255. doi:10.1007/s00040-010-0080-7.
  15. ^ a b Plettner, E.; et al. (23 September 1996). "Species- and caste-determined mandibular gland signals in honeybees". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 23: 363–377. doi:10.1023/b:joec.0000006365.20996.a2. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  16. ^ a b c d e Oldroyd, Benjamin; et al. (9 August 1996). "Polyandry in the genus Apis, particularly Apis andreniformis". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 40: 17–26. doi:10.1007/s002650050311. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apis_andreniformis&oldid=727855741"