Ascaric or Ascarich (Latin: Ascaricus) was an early Frankish war leader, who, along with his co-leader, Merogais, are the earliest known leaders explicitly called Frankish, although the name of the Franks is earlier.
Ascaric or Asceric and various reflexes is not an uncommon modern name among European personal names, both last and first. Panegyric VI gives the first and only instance of a Frankish war leader (possibly a king) of that name. Other subsequent non-regal notables wore the name also. Whether they were all named from Panegyric VI is questionable.
-ric < Celtic rig- < Indo-European *rēg-, a tribal ruler < *reg-, "rule."
The word was loaned into Germanic during the Celtic Empire of Proto-history, when the Celts populated both banks of the Rhine and led the Germanic tribes to victory over the classical civilizations of the south. It means "ruler" in the sense of war-leader.
The derivation of Asca- is:
Protogermanic *aska- (independently *askaz) < Indo-European *ōs < early Indo-European h3es-, "ash tree."
The word can also mean "spear" or "ship." Historical linguists, notably Jacob Grimm, have looked for metaphorical meanings of the name "ash." The Asc- element might be interpreted as "Wodan's spear," meaning a warrior infused with its power. All warriors were devotees of the mad god, Wodanaz, source of all battle fury. The Germanic symbol of this fury was the Spear of Wodin. Grimm also conjectured that the name was related to the creation myth given in the Edda, a compendium of poetic compositions written in the 13th century in Iceland, surviving from earlier times. He says:
"And here I am the more entitled to take the Norse ideas for a groundwork, as indications are not wanting of their having equally prevailed among the other Teutonic races."
The use of Asca- in both place and personal names suggests an ethnic, quasi-national usage in the Protogermanic period. The time parameters exclude an origin in the reflex languages, such as Old Norse or Old High German. The name descended to various forms in other languages. Whether Ascaric understood his name to mean these elements is debatable; he may have just used it as a name.
Historical incident involving Ascaric and Merogais
The sources for the appearance of Ascaric and Merogais in history are few, but were written within a few years of their deaths in contemporary times. They are considered reliable. They are mentioned in a collection of recorded speeches from the period called the Panegyrici latini. These were numbered more or less at random. Only three of the twelve are concerned with the Frankish invasions of Gaul in the late 3rd and early 4th centuries: numbers IV, VI and VII. Only VI provides any significant detail. The authors of VI and VII, conventionally entitled "Panegyric of Constantine" and "Panegyric of Maximian and Constantine" respectively, remain unknown and are therefore typically called "anonymous." Number IV, the earliest, which precedes any of the events involving the two war leaders, is termed "Eumenius for the Restoration of the Schools" because in it the orator quotes a letter from Constantius Chlorus identifying him as Eumenius. In addition Eutropius makes some mention of the period.
The earliest of the three panegyrics, IV, delivered at Lyon or Autun by Eumenius to the governor of the province, which was probably Lugdunensis II between the Seine and the Loire, on the occasion of a visit, begs the governor to restore the Maenianae school of Autun, and contributes his own salary to the effort. Only background information about the Franks is given. They assisted the pretender Carausius, temporary ruler of Britain and parts of Gaul. When the imperial government stabilized after a dynastic struggle, Constantius Chlorus reconquered northwestern Gaul, ejected the Franks from there and proceeded to the liberation of Britain. The speech, made in 297 or 298, immediately after the reconquest, in the ruins of the city, presented a letter from Constantius expressing his desire to do something for the children of Gaul and appointing Eumenius, a member of the imperial staff, whose grandfather had been headmaster, to rebuild the school.
Panegyric VII is a speech delivered to Constantine I on the occasion of his taking the senior emperor's, Maximian's, daughter in marriage in 307. By then the Franks have been cleared out of Gaul a second time. The two chiefs have just been executed. The mood is festive. The speaker brags of the treatment meted out to the treacherous Franks. The mood did not last, as once again the emperors became embroiled in conflict. By 310 Maximian is dead, his daughter repudiated, and Constantine is senior emperor. An uneasy peace has been restored in Gaul.
In Panegryric VI, on the anniversary of the foundation of Trier a middle-aged school-teacher from Autun and former member of the imperial court addresses the emperor, guest of the celebration, at the beginning of August. He could be Eumenius, but there is no proof that he is. The emperor has just successfully struck a blow against the Bructeri. The speaker reveals the details but a note of fear manages to pervade the speech. Let the Franks retaliate, he says. We know they can cross the Rhine anywhere at any time they choose. Our defense is such terror that they will fear even to approach the bank. There are forts and ships on every landing place. We don't fear them.
Accession of Constantine
According to Panegyric VI, the young Constantine I began his reign by suppressing Frankish raids across the Rhine in the country of the later Ripuarian Franks (who may well have been known by that name, but more likely only after they had settled in Lower Germany). Motivated by the desire to restore the peace by quelling "some contemptible band of barbarians who tested the very beginnings of your [his] reign with a sudden attack and unexpected brigandage," he brought an army back from Britain, where his father, Constantius Chlorus, Augustus of the empire, had been conducting a punitive campaign against the Picts in 305. Chlorus died at York of natural causes in 306 after a successful campaign. On his deathbed he asked that the troops proclaim his son Augustus in his place. After a quick voice vote shouted throughout the camp they "threw the purple" (an imperial robe) over him as he wept. He attempted to escape by horse but the empire pursued and brought him back. Accepting the command he proceeded "to punish with the ultimate penalty the kings of Francia themselves, who took the opportunity of your [his] father's absence to violate the peace."
The command was subsequently confirmed by the senior emperor, Galerius, who insisted he take the role of Caesar, or junior emperor. Rome had been sharing the burdensome and dangerous highest office between multiple emperors for some time, at that time two, junior and senior. Dynastic struggles were a frequent distraction, which the Franks could always be counted on to expolit to the fullest, from which they acquired the reputation of being mobile, "treacherous," a serious character flaw in the Roman ethic, and one always punished severely.
The Frankish expedition
In 306 Ascaric and Merogais led a Frankish raid across the Rhine into southern Gaul while Constantius Chlorus was campaigning against the Picts in Britannia. Apparently the Franks or the Bructeri (their tribe) had made a previous agreement with Rome, since Chlorus' successor, his son Constantine I, sought to punish them as traitors upon his return. The two chieftains were defeated, captured, and executed "for their past crimes", an act which "bound with fear the slippery loyalty of the whole race," according to one of the emperor's anonymous panegyrists. The execution took place in one of the chief cities of Gaul, probably Trier, Constantine's capital in Gaul, and the two Franks and their followers were torn apart by animals in the amphitheatre before a large crowd. Their defeat was followed by a punitive expedition against the tribe from which they had conducted the raid, the Bructeri.
Retaliation against the Bructeri
Having made an example of the two war leaders, Constantine judged that it was not enough of an object lesson. In addition, "so that the enemy should not merely grieve over the punishment of their kings,"  he determined to conduct a punitive raid on the Bructeri, presumably the tribe of the two leaders. The Romans viewed them as important kings of the Franks. They were probably not that, as the term Francia comprised all the tribes on the right bank of the Rhine. They had undoubtedly followed the Frankish custom of proposing an expedition, which the subsequent action of the Romans supports, and therefore their status could have been any of respect and import. As war chiefs, they were commanders of the expedition. Constantine was going to hold responsible all the villages that had supported the expedition.
The Bructeri were located in the vicinity Wuppertal, opposite the site of the future Düsseldorf, not far downstream from the Frankish city of Cologne, later the capital city of the Ripuarian Franks. They were relative newcomers to the area, having been allowed to settle there from further downstream by the Ubii. Constantine struck the Bructeri in 308 by surprise to prevent them from escaping through the woods and marshes. He killed or captured the target population with their herds and burned several villages. He then made a selection:
"The adults who were captured, those whose untrustworthiness made them unfit for military service and whose ferocity for slavery, were given over to the amphitheater for punishment, and their great numbers wore out the raging beasts."
He did not depopulate the tribe or the region, as they remained to participate in subsequent historical events, nor did he subject them. The limits of the empire remained the Rhine river. Moreover, the Panegyric implies that, not only were Franks serving in the Roman military, but that Frankish prisoners of war might be given that option as well.
- Manuscript variants of Panegyric VI (VII) offer some variant spellings generally ignored as scribal errors.
- Watkins, Calvert (1992). Indo-European Roots Appendix. "reg-". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (3rd ed.). Boston; New York; London: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
- Köbler, Gerhard (2000). "*ōs -". Indogermanisches Wörterbuch (in German) (3rd ed.).
- Patton, Kimberley Christine (2009). Religion of the Gods: Ritual, Paradox and Reflexivity. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. p. 224.
- Grimm 1883, p. 558.
- Nixon & Rodgers 1994, pp. 145–149
- Nixon & Rodgers 1994, p. 215
- Nixon & Rodgers 1994, pp. 211–212.
- Abridgement of Roman History, 10.3.
- Panegyric VI.10.1.
- Panegyric VI.8.2.
- Panegyric VI.10.1-4.
- Nixon & Rodgers 1994, p. 197.
- Long 1996, p. 92, from Panegyric VII.4.2.
- Panegyric VI.12.1-3.
- Nixon & Rodgers 1994, p. 235.
- Jacques de La Baune; Christian Schwarz (Contributors) (1728). Panegyrici veteres (in Latin). Venice: Bartolomaeum Javarina.
- Grimm, Jacob; Stallybrass, James Steven (Translator, Contributor) (1883). Teutonic Mythology II (4th ed.). London: George Bell & Sons.
- Landriot, Jean-François-Anne, and Rochet, Benoît Joseph (1854). Traduction des discours d'Eumène: accompagnée du texte. Autun: Michel Dejussieu et Louis Villedry.
- Long, Jacqueline (1996). Claudian's 'In Eutropium': Or, How, When, and Why to Slander a Eunuch. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0-8078-2263-9.
- Nixon, C.E.V.; Rodgers, Barbara S. (1994). In praise of later Roman emperors: the Panegyrici Latini. The Transformation of the Classical Heritage, 21. Berkeley: University of California Press.
|Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article Franks.|